IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v100y2021ics030504831930547x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying areas vulnerable to homicide using multiple criteria analysis and spatial analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Mota, Caroline Maria de Miranda
  • Figueiredo, Ciro José Jardim de
  • Pereira, Débora Viana e Sousa

Abstract

The decision-making process in public security is not an easy task. Several aspects must be considered, since resources are limited, whereas coverage should be extensive. Usually, preventative actions are allocated to areas that are more prone to violence, where criminal occurrences have happened in the recent past. In Brazil, such decisions are made in an ad-hoc way, considering only the knowledge of a specialist. This paper, however, aims to identify homicide vulnerability areas, taking into account the knowledge and preferences of an expert decision-maker under several criteria and data from a demographic census. Our model aggregates multiple-criteria analysis, based on Dominance-based Rough Set Approach, and spatial analysis, which consist of hot-spot analysis and local Moran's I. The model was applied in a neighbourhood of Brazil. The approach was able to highlight the problematic areas in the neighbourhood, and suggested locations where public policy and, consequently, limited resources should be allocated.

Suggested Citation

  • Mota, Caroline Maria de Miranda & Figueiredo, Ciro José Jardim de & Pereira, Débora Viana e Sousa, 2021. "Identifying areas vulnerable to homicide using multiple criteria analysis and spatial analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:100:y:2021:i:c:s030504831930547x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2020.102211
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030504831930547X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.omega.2020.102211?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Y. Chen & D. Marc Kilgour & Keith W. Hipel, 2012. "A Decision Rule Aggregation Approach to Multiple Criteria-Multiple Participant Sorting," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 727-745, September.
    2. Fusco, Elisa & Vidoli, Francesco & Sahoo, Biresh K., 2018. "Spatial heterogeneity in composite indicator: A methodological proposal," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 1-14.
    3. Camacho-Collados, M. & Liberatore, F. & Angulo, J.M., 2015. "A multi-criteria Police Districting Problem for the efficient and effective design of patrol sector," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(2), pages 674-684.
    4. Greco, Salvatore & Matarazzo, Benedetto & Slowinski, Roman, 2001. "Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(1), pages 1-47, February.
    5. Quintero, Alejandro & Konare, Dougoukolo & Pierre, Samuel, 2005. "Prototyping an intelligent decision support system for improving urban infrastructures management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(3), pages 654-672, May.
    6. Ebrahim Ahmadisharaf & Alfred Kalyanapu & Eun-Sung Chung, 2015. "Evaluating the Effects of Inundation Duration and Velocity on Selection of Flood Management Alternatives Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(8), pages 2543-2561, June.
    7. Chen, Yuh-Wen & Wang, Chi-Hwang & Lin, Sain-Ju, 2008. "A multi-objective geographic information system for route selection of nuclear waste transport," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 363-372, June.
    8. Greco, Salvatore & Matarazzo, Benedetto & Slowinski, Roman, 2002. "Rough sets methodology for sorting problems in presence of multiple attributes and criteria," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(2), pages 247-259, April.
    9. Hu, Qiwei & Chakhar, Salem & Siraj, Sajid & Labib, Ashraf, 2017. "Spare parts classification in industrial manufacturing using the dominance-based rough set approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(3), pages 1136-1163.
    10. Chakhar, Salem & Ishizaka, Alessio & Labib, Ashraf & Saad, Inès, 2016. "Dominance-based rough set approach for group decisions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(1), pages 206-224.
    11. Ciro Figueiredo & Caroline Mota, 2019. "Learning Preferences in a Spatial Multiple Criteria Decision Approach: An Application in Public Security Planning," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(04), pages 1403-1432, July.
    12. Fan Zifu & Sun Hong & Wang Lihua, 2015. "Research of the Classification Model Based on Dominance Rough Set Approach for China Emergency Communication," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2015, pages 1-8, March.
    13. Mohler, George, 2014. "Marked point process hotspot maps for homicide and gun crime prediction in Chicago," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 491-497.
    14. Menezes, Tatiane & Silveira-Neto, Raul & Monteiro, Circe & Ratton, José Luiz, 2013. "Spatial correlation between homicide rates and inequality: Evidence from urban neighborhoods," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 97-99.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Keskin, Burcu B. & Griffin, Emily C. & Prell, Jonathan O. & Dilkina, Bistra & Ferber, Aaron & MacDonald, John & Hilend, Rowan & Griffis, Stanley & Gore, Meredith L., 2023. "Quantitative Investigation of Wildlife Trafficking Supply Chains: A Review," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    2. Corrente, Salvatore & Greco, Salvatore & Matarazzo, Benedetto & Słowiński, Roman, 2024. "Explainable interactive evolutionary multiobjective optimization," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Du, Wen Sheng & Hu, Bao Qing, 2018. "A fast heuristic attribute reduction approach to ordered decision systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(2), pages 440-452.
    2. Bouzayane, Sarra & Saad, Inès, 2020. "A multicriteria approach based on rough set theory for the incremental Periodic prediction," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(1), pages 282-298.
    3. Du, Wen Sheng & Hu, Bao Qing, 2017. "Dominance-based rough fuzzy set approach and its application to rule induction," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(2), pages 690-703.
    4. Fatima‐Zohra Younsi & Salem Chakhar & Alessio Ishizaka & Djamila Hamdadou & Omar Boussaid, 2020. "A Dominance‐Based Rough Set Approach for an Enhanced Assessment of Seasonal Influenza Risk," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(7), pages 1323-1341, July.
    5. Miłosz Kadziński & Lucia Rocchi & Grzegorz Miebs & David Grohmann & Maria Elena Menconi & Luisa Paolotti, 2018. "Multiple Criteria Assessment of Insulating Materials with a Group Decision Framework Incorporating Outranking Preference Model and Characteristic Class Profiles," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 33-59, February.
    6. Huang, Bing & Li, Huaxiong & Feng, Guofu & Zhou, Xianzhong, 2019. "Dominance-based rough sets in multi-scale intuitionistic fuzzy decision tables," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 348(C), pages 487-512.
    7. Bouyssou, Denis & Marchant, Thierry, 2007. "An axiomatic approach to noncompensatory sorting methods in MCDM, II: More than two categories," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 178(1), pages 246-276, April.
    8. Azam, Nouman & Zhang, Yan & Yao, JingTao, 2017. "Evaluation functions and decision conditions of three-way decisions with game-theoretic rough sets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(2), pages 704-714.
    9. Hu, Qiwei & Chakhar, Salem & Siraj, Sajid & Labib, Ashraf, 2017. "Spare parts classification in industrial manufacturing using the dominance-based rough set approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(3), pages 1136-1163.
    10. Zopounidis, Constantin & Doumpos, Michael, 2002. "Multicriteria classification and sorting methods: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(2), pages 229-246, April.
    11. Fernandez, Eduardo & Navarro, Jorge & Bernal, Sergio, 2009. "Multicriteria sorting using a valued indifference relation under a preference disaggregation paradigm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(2), pages 602-609, October.
    12. Doumpos, Michael & Zopounidis, Constantin, 2004. "Developing sorting models using preference disaggregation analysis: An experimental investigation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(3), pages 585-598, May.
    13. Dembczynski, Krzysztof & Greco, Salvatore & Slowinski, Roman, 2009. "Rough set approach to multiple criteria classification with imprecise evaluations and assignments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(2), pages 626-636, October.
    14. Rolland, Antoine, 2013. "Reference-based preferences aggregation procedures in multi-criteria decision making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(3), pages 479-486.
    15. Wu, Siqi & Wu, Meng & Dong, Yucheng & Liang, Haiming & Zhao, Sihai, 2020. "The 2-rank additive model with axiomatic design in multiple attribute decision making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(2), pages 536-545.
    16. Salvatore Corrente & Michael Doumpos & Salvatore Greco & Roman Słowiński & Constantin Zopounidis, 2017. "Multiple criteria hierarchy process for sorting problems based on ordinal regression with additive value functions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 251(1), pages 117-139, April.
    17. Bouyssou, Denis & Marchant, Thierry, 2007. "An axiomatic approach to noncompensatory sorting methods in MCDM, I: The case of two categories," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 178(1), pages 217-245, April.
    18. Chakhar, Salem & Ishizaka, Alessio & Thorpe, Andy & Cox, Joe & Nguyen, Thang & Ford, Liz, 2020. "Calculating the relative importance of condition attributes based on the characteristics of decision rules and attribute reducts: Application to crowdfunding," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(2), pages 689-712.
    19. Mao, Wenxin & Wang, Wenping & Sun, Huifang & Yao, Peiyi & Wang, Xiaolei & Luo, Dang, 2021. "Urban industrial transformation patterns under natural resource dependence: A rule mining technique," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    20. Sarah Ben Amor & Fateh Belaid & Ramzi Benkraiem & Boumediene Ramdani & Khaled Guesmi, 2023. "Multi-criteria classification, sorting, and clustering: a bibliometric review and research agenda," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(2), pages 771-793, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:100:y:2021:i:c:s030504831930547x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.