IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/joepsy/v18y1997i6p629-648.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What inhibits the mere-exposure effect: Recollection or familiarity?

Author

Listed:
  • Ye, Gewei
  • van Raaij, W. Fred

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Ye, Gewei & van Raaij, W. Fred, 1997. "What inhibits the mere-exposure effect: Recollection or familiarity?," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 18(6), pages 629-648, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:18:y:1997:i:6:p:629-648
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-4870(97)00027-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Obermiller, Carl, 1985. "Varieties of Mere Exposure: The Effects of Processing Style and Repetition on Affective Response," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 12(1), pages 17-30, June.
    2. Greenwald, Anthony G & Leavitt, Clark, 1984. "Audience Involvement in Advertising: Four Levels," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 11(1), pages 581-592, June.
    3. Janiszewski, Chris, 1993. "Preattentive Mere Exposure Effects," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 20(3), pages 376-392, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rosbergen, Edward & Wedel, Michel & Pieters, Rik, 1997. "Analyzing visual attention tot repeated print advertising using scanpath theory," Research Report 97B32, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    2. Rosbergen, Edward & Pieters, Rik & Wedel, Michel, 1995. "Undirected visual attention to advertising : a segment-level analysis," Research Report 95B28, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    3. Puccinelli, Nancy M. & Goodstein, Ronald C. & Grewal, Dhruv & Price, Robert & Raghubir, Priya & Stewart, David, 2009. "Customer Experience Management in Retailing: Understanding the Buying Process," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 85(1), pages 15-30.
    4. Patrali Chatterjee & Donna L. Hoffman & Thomas P. Novak, 2003. "Modeling the Clickstream: Implications for Web-Based Advertising Efforts," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 520-541, May.
    5. Rosbergen, E. & Pieters, R. & Wedel, M., 1997. "Visual attention to advertising : A segment-level analysis," Other publications TiSEM c77552c4-5b16-4ecb-8a21-2, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    6. repec:dgr:rugsom:95b28 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. repec:dgr:rugsom:97b32 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Shun-Yang Lee & Julian Runge & Daniel Yoo & Yakov Bart & Anett Gyurak & J. W. Schneider, 2023. "COVID-19 Demand Shocks Revisited: Did Advertising Technology Help Mitigate Adverse Consequences for Small and Midsize Businesses?," Papers 2307.09035, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2024.
    9. Chao-Ming Yang, 2020. "Influences of Product Involvement and Symbolic Consumption Cues in Advertisements on Consumer Attitudes," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(2), pages 1-15, March.
    10. O'Cass, A., 2000. "An assessment of consumers product, purchase decision, advertising and consumption involvement in fashion clothing," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 21(5), pages 545-576, October.
    11. Halloran, Timothy J. & Lutz, Richard J., 2021. "Let's Give Them Something to Talk About: Which Social Media Engagements Predict Purchase Frequency?," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 83-95.
    12. Tibert Verhagen & Daniel Bloemers, 2018. "Exploring the cognitive and affective bases of online purchase intentions: a hierarchical test across product types," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 537-561, September.
    13. Kim, Jooyoung & Ahn, Sun Joo (Grace) & Kwon, Eun Sook & Reid, Leonard N., 2017. "TV advertising engagement as a state of immersion and presence," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 67-76.
    14. Pieters, R. & Warlop, L., 1998. "Visual Attention During Brand Choice : The Impact of Time Pressure and Task Motivation," Discussion Paper 1998-69, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    15. Thalia Metta Halim & Kiattipoom Kiatkawsin, 2021. "Beauty and Celebrity: Korean Entertainment and Its Impacts on Female Indonesian Viewers’ Consumption Intentions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, January.
    16. Kfir Eliaz & Ran Spiegler, 2011. "Consideration Sets and Competitive Marketing," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 78(1), pages 235-262.
    17. Khan Md Raziuddin Taufique & Chamhuri Siwar & Basri Talib & Farah Hasan Sarah & Norshamliza Chamhuri, 2014. "Synthesis of Constructs for Modeling Consumers’ Understanding and Perception of Eco-Labels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-25, April.
    18. Hauser, John R., 2014. "Consideration-set heuristics," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(8), pages 1688-1699.
    19. Catarina Sismeiro & Ammara Mahmood, 2018. "Competitive vs. Complementary Effects in Online Social Networks and News Consumption: A Natural Experiment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(11), pages 5014-5037, November.
    20. repec:dgr:rugsom:95b27 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Yu-Shan Athena Chen & Lien-Ti Bei, 2019. "Free the brand: How a logo frame influences the potentiality of brand extensions," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(4), pages 349-364, July.
    22. Richa Agrawal & Vinay Patangia, 2005. "Need for Cognition as Determinant of Response to Rational and Emotional Ad Appeals," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 30(2), pages 139-149, May.
    23. Otterbring, Tobias & Wästlund, Erik & Gustafsson, Anders & Shams, Poja, 2014. "Vision (im)possible? The effects of in-store signage on customers’ visual attention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(5), pages 676-684.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:18:y:1997:i:6:p:629-648. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/joep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.