IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jobhdp/v35y1985i2p202-215.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Being attractive, advantage or disadvantage? Performance-based evaluations and recommended personnel actions as a function of appearance, sex, and job type

Author

Listed:
  • Heilman, Madeline E.
  • Stopeck, Melanie H.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Heilman, Madeline E. & Stopeck, Melanie H., 1985. "Being attractive, advantage or disadvantage? Performance-based evaluations and recommended personnel actions as a function of appearance, sex, and job type," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 202-215, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:35:y:1985:i:2:p:202-215
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0749-5978(85)90035-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joel I Osorio & Geannyne Villegas & Lejla R Stojanovic & Sergei Paylian, 2020. "REGENERAGE Cream Anti-aging Effect in Women," JOJ Dermatology & Cosmetics, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 2(4), pages 49-55, April.
    2. Michał Krawczyk & Magdalena Smyk, 2015. "Gender, beauty and support networks in academia: evidence from a field experiment," Working Papers 2015-43, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    3. Söderlund, Magnus & Julander, Claes-Robert, 2009. "Physical attractiveness of the service worker in the moment of truth and its effects on customer satisfaction," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 216-226.
    4. Dalton Conley & Brian J. McCabe, 2011. "Body Mass Index and Physical Attractiveness: Evidence From a Combination Image-Alteration/List Experiment," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 40(1), pages 6-31, February.
    5. Anica Rose, 2017. "Subjective Appraisals of Employee Potential: Do Gender and Managerial Level Matter?," Working Papers Dissertations 22, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    6. Gan, Hongwu & Lu, Shengfeng & Lu, Weijie & Niu, Geng & Zhou, Yang, 2023. "Beauty and stock market participation," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    7. Bazel-Shoham, Ofra & Lee, Sang Mook & Rivera, Michael J. & Shoham, Amir, 2020. "Impact of the female board members and gaps in linguistic gender marking on cross-border M&A," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 55(2).
    8. Johnson, Stefanie K. & Sitzmann, Traci & Nguyen, Anh Thuy, 2014. "Don’t hate me because I’m beautiful: Acknowledging appearance mitigates the “beauty is beastly” effect," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 125(2), pages 184-192.
    9. Markus Gmuer, 2006. "The Gendered Stereotype of the ?Good Manager? Sex Role Expectations towards Male and Female Managers," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 17(2), pages 104-121.
    10. Seigner, Benedikt David Christian & Milanov, Hana, 2023. "Mirror, mirror—A gendered lens on female entrepreneurs’ facial attractiveness in reward-based crowdfunding," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 20(C).
    11. Stefano I. Di Domenico & Marc A. Fournier, 2014. "Hierarchy Formation and Self-Determination," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(4), pages 21582440145, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:35:y:1985:i:2:p:202-215. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/obhdp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.