IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jobhdp/v179y2023ics074959782300050x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Curiosity in organizations: Addressing adverse reactions, trade-offs, and multi-level dynamics

Author

Listed:
  • Kashdan, Todd
  • Harrison, Spencer H.
  • Polman, Evan
  • Kark, Ronit

Abstract

Curiosity serves a basic function in increasing the probability of work engagement, productivity, creativity, and innovation. Much of what is known about curiosity in organizations has been limited to explorations of individuals. Here, we provide empirically supported insights on how curiosity operates at various levels spanning individuals, collaborations, teams, organizations, and societies. Additionally, we advance research and practice by addressing several neglected issues. There is a strange disconnect in how leaders and co-workers encourage curiosity yet often experience an adverse reaction during or after its occurrence. There is also a strange asymmetry in the field such that curiosity is often described as a universally positive asset/trait yet there are costs that are worthy of consideration such as decision-making speed (i.e., trade-offs). Depending on the type of curiosity and mode of expression, curiosity can have bright, dark, or mixed consequences. Our aim is to help scientists and practitioners to better understand and intervene when attempting to capitalize on curiosity.

Suggested Citation

  • Kashdan, Todd & Harrison, Spencer H. & Polman, Evan & Kark, Ronit, 2023. "Curiosity in organizations: Addressing adverse reactions, trade-offs, and multi-level dynamics," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:179:y:2023:i:c:s074959782300050x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2023.104274
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074959782300050X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.obhdp.2023.104274?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David M. Lydon-Staley & Dale Zhou & Ann Sizemore Blevins & Perry Zurn & Danielle S. Bassett, 2021. "Hunters, busybodies and the knowledge network building associated with deprivation curiosity," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 5(3), pages 327-336, March.
    2. Polman, Evan & Ruttan, Rachel L. & Peck, Joann, 2022. "Using curiosity to incentivize the choice of “should” options," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    3. Ma, Jie (Yonas), 2023. "Curious supervisor puts team innovation within reach: Investigating supervisor trait curiosity as a catalyst for collective actions," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    4. Thompson, Phillip S. & Bolino, Mark C. & Norris, Kalan R. & Kuo, Shu-Tsen, 2023. "Unconstructive curiosity killed the cat: The importance of follower political skill and constructive curiosity to avoid leader perceptions of insubordination and unlikability," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    5. Schweitzer, Vera M. & Gerpott, Fabiola H. & Rivkin, Wladislaw & Stollberger, Jakob, 2023. "(Don’t) mind the gap? Information gaps compound curiosity yet also feed frustration at work," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    6. Thompson, Phillip S. & Klotz, Anthony C., 2022. "Led by curiosity and responding with voice: The influence of leader displays of curiosity and leader gender on follower reactions of psychological safety and voice," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hinrichs, Nicole & Stierand, Marc & Glăveanu, Vlad, 2023. "Food for thought: How curiosity externalization is fostered through organizational identity," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    2. Yoon, Jisung & Park, Jinseo & Yun, Jinhyuk & Jung, Woo-Sung, 2023. "Quantifying knowledge synchronization with the network-driven approach," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 17(4).
    3. Thompson, Phillip S. & Bolino, Mark C. & Norris, Kalan R. & Kuo, Shu-Tsen, 2023. "Unconstructive curiosity killed the cat: The importance of follower political skill and constructive curiosity to avoid leader perceptions of insubordination and unlikability," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    4. Hongmi Lee & Janice Chen, 2022. "Predicting memory from the network structure of naturalistic events," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Horn, Samantha & Litovsky, Yana & Loewenstein, George, 2024. "Using curiosity to counter health information avoidance," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
    6. Chang, Yu-Yu & Shih, Hui-Yu & Lin, Bou‐Wen, 2023. "Work curiosity and R&D professionals’ creative performance: Scientists vs. engineers," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:179:y:2023:i:c:s074959782300050x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/obhdp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.