IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jmvana/v88y2004i1p118-130.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An extension of the factorization theorem to the non-positive case

Author

Listed:
  • Kopciuszewski, Pawel

Abstract

This paper presents a method of determining joint distributions by known conditional distributions. A generalization of the Factorization Theorem is proposed. The generalized theorem is proved under the assumption that the support of unknown joint distribution may be divided into a countable number of sets, which all satisfy the relative weak positivity condition. This condition is defined in the paper and it generalizes the positivity condition introduced by Hammersley and Clifford. The theorem is illustrated with three examples. In the first example we determine a joint density in the case when the support of an unknown density is a continuous nonproduct set from Euclidean space . In the second example we seek the joint probability for the number of trials and the number of successes in Bernoulli's scheme. We also examine a simple example given by Kaiser and Cressie (J. Multivariate Anal. 73 (2000) 199).

Suggested Citation

  • Kopciuszewski, Pawel, 2004. "An extension of the factorization theorem to the non-positive case," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(1), pages 118-130, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jmvana:v:88:y:2004:i:1:p:118-130
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047-259X(03)00055-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kaiser, Mark S. & Cressie, Noel, 2000. "The Construction of Multivariate Distributions from Markov Random Fields," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 73(2), pages 199-220, May.
    2. Hobert, J. P. & Robert, C. P. & Goutis, C., 1997. "Connectedness conditions for the convergence of the Gibbs sampler," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 235-240, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Linda Khachatryan & Boris S. Nahapetian, 2023. "On the Characterization of a Finite Random Field by Conditional Distribution and its Gibbs Form," Journal of Theoretical Probability, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 1743-1761, September.
    2. Berti, Patrizia & Dreassi, Emanuela & Rigo, Pietro, 2014. "Compatibility results for conditional distributions," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 190-203.
    3. Noel Cressie & Craig Liu, 2001. "Binary Markov Mesh Models and Symmetric Markov Random Fields: Some Results on their Equivalence," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 5-34, March.
    4. Christopher K. Wikle, 2003. "Hierarchical Models in Environmental Science," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 71(2), pages 181-199, August.
    5. Wang, Yuchung J. & Kuo, Kun-Lin, 2010. "Compatibility of discrete conditional distributions with structural zeros," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(1), pages 191-199, January.
    6. Emily Casleton & Daniel J. Nordman & Mark S. Kaiser, 2022. "Modeling Transitivity in Local Structure Graph Models," Sankhya A: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 84(1), pages 389-417, June.
    7. Mark S. Kaiser & PetruĊ£a C. Caragea, 2009. "Exploring Dependence with Data on Spatial Lattices," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(3), pages 857-865, September.
    8. R. Reeves, 2004. "Efficient recursions for general factorisable models," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 91(3), pages 751-757, September.
    9. Vidal, Ignacio & Bolfarini, Heleno, 2011. "Bayesian estimation of regression parameters in elliptical measurement error models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 81(9), pages 1398-1406, September.
    10. Nail Kashaev & Natalia Lazzati, 2019. "Peer Effects in Random Consideration Sets," Papers 1904.06742, arXiv.org, revised May 2021.
    11. Dreassi, Emanuela & Rigo, Pietro, 2017. "A note on compatibility of conditional autoregressive models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 9-16.
    12. Lee, Jaehyung & Kaiser, Mark S. & Cressie, Noel, 2001. "Multiway Dependence in Exponential Family Conditional Distributions," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 79(2), pages 171-190, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jmvana:v:88:y:2004:i:1:p:118-130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.