IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jmvana/v169y2019icp33-48.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A tail adaptive approach for change point detection

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Bin
  • Zhou, Cheng
  • Zhang, Xinsheng

Abstract

For change point problems with Gaussian distributions, the CUSUM method is most efficient for detecting mean shifts. In contrast, it is not so efficient for heavy-tailed or contaminated data because of its sensitivity to outliers. To address this issue, Csörgő and Horváth (1988) introduced the Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test based on two-sample U-statistics. In practice, however, the tail structure of distributions is typically unknown. For example, Barndorff-Nielsen and Shephard (2001) showed that with higher frequency, stock returns’ tails become heavier. To our knowledge, there are no uniformly most powerful testing methods for both heavy and light-tailed distributions. To deal with this issue, we construct a new family of test statistics and combine them to adapt to different tails. As the final test statistic is complex, we design a low-cost bootstrap procedure to approximate its limiting distribution. To capture temporal data dependence, we assume that the data follow a near epoch dependent process (Borovkova et al., 2001), which includes ARMA and GARCH processes, among others. We explore the validity of our method both theoretically and through simulation. We also illustrate its use with data on the S&P 500 index.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Bin & Zhou, Cheng & Zhang, Xinsheng, 2019. "A tail adaptive approach for change point detection," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 33-48.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jmvana:v:169:y:2019:i:c:p:33-48
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jmva.2018.08.010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047259X18302100
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jmva.2018.08.010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dehling, Herold & Wendler, Martin, 2010. "Central limit theorem and the bootstrap for U-statistics of strongly mixing data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(1), pages 126-137, January.
    2. Olimjon Sharipov & Martin Wendler, 2012. "Bootstrap for the sample mean and for -statistics of mixing and near-epoch dependent processes," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 317-342.
    3. Alexander Aue & Lajos Horváth, 2013. "Structural breaks in time series," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 1-16, January.
    4. Paul Embrechts & Sidney Resnick & Gennady Samorodnitsky, 1999. "Extreme Value Theory as a Risk Management Tool," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(2), pages 30-41.
    5. Andrews, Donald W K, 1991. "Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 59(3), pages 817-858, May.
    6. Robbins, Michael W. & Lund, Robert B. & Gallagher, Colin M. & Lu, QiQi, 2011. "Changepoints in the North Atlantic Tropical Cyclone Record," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 106(493), pages 89-99.
    7. Horváth, Lajos & Kokoszka, Piotr & Steinebach, Josef, 1999. "Testing for Changes in Multivariate Dependent Observations with an Application to Temperature Changes," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 96-119, January.
    8. Ole E. Barndorff‐Nielsen & Neil Shephard, 2001. "Non‐Gaussian Ornstein–Uhlenbeck‐based models and some of their uses in financial economics," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 63(2), pages 167-241.
    9. Shao, Xiaofeng & Zhang, Xianyang, 2010. "Testing for Change Points in Time Series," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 105(491), pages 1228-1240.
    10. A. N. Pettitt, 1979. "A Non‐Parametric Approach to the Change‐Point Problem," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 28(2), pages 126-135, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Junwei Hu & Lihong Wang, 2023. "A weighted U-statistic based change point test for multivariate time series," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 64(3), pages 753-778, June.
    2. Gabriela Ciuperca, 2022. "Real-time detection of a change-point in a linear expectile model," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 63(4), pages 1323-1367, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Junwei Hu & Lihong Wang, 2023. "A weighted U-statistic based change point test for multivariate time series," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 64(3), pages 753-778, June.
    2. Hong, Yongmiao & Linton, Oliver & McCabe, Brendan & Sun, Jiajing & Wang, Shouyang, 2024. "Kolmogorov–Smirnov type testing for structural breaks: A new adjusted-range based self-normalization approach," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 238(2).
    3. Josua Gösmann & Tobias Kley & Holger Dette, 2021. "A new approach for open‐end sequential change point monitoring," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(1), pages 63-84, January.
    4. Hoga, Yannick, 2017. "Monitoring multivariate time series," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 105-121.
    5. Zifeng Zhao & Feiyu Jiang & Xiaofeng Shao, 2022. "Segmenting time series via self‐normalisation," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 84(5), pages 1699-1725, November.
    6. Buddhananda Banerjee & Satyaki Mazumder, 2018. "A more powerful test identifying the change in mean of functional data," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 70(3), pages 691-715, June.
    7. Alfredas Račkauskas & Martin Wendler, 2020. "Convergence of U-processes in Hölder spaces with application to robust detection of a changed segment," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(4), pages 1409-1435, August.
    8. Kai Wenger & Christian Leschinski & Philipp Sibbertsen, 2019. "Change-in-mean tests in long-memory time series: a review of recent developments," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 103(2), pages 237-256, June.
    9. Marco R. Barassi & Nicola Spagnolo & Yuqian Zhao, 2018. "Fractional Integration Versus Structural Change: Testing the Convergence of $$\hbox {CO}_{2}$$ CO 2 Emissions," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 71(4), pages 923-968, December.
    10. Jiang, Feiyu & Wang, Runmin & Shao, Xiaofeng, 2023. "Robust inference for change points in high dimension," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    11. Cho, Haeran & Fryzlewicz, Piotr, 2023. "Multiple change point detection under serial dependence: wild contrast maximisation and gappy Schwarz algorithm," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 120085, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Bontemps, Christian & Meddahi, Nour, 2005. "Testing normality: a GMM approach," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 149-186, January.
    13. Jean-François Quessy, 2019. "Consistent nonparametric tests for detecting gradual changes in the marginals and the copula of multivariate time series," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 60(3), pages 717-746, June.
    14. Jingzhi Huang & Liuren Wu, 2004. "Specification Analysis of Option Pricing Models Based on Time- Changed Levy Processes," Finance 0401002, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Alaa Abi Morshed & Elena Andreou & Otilia Boldea, 2018. "Structural Break Tests Robust to Regression Misspecification," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-39, May.
    16. Lajos Horváth & Curtis Miller & Gregory Rice, 2021. "Detecting early or late changes in linear models with heteroscedastic errors," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 48(2), pages 577-609, June.
    17. Bin Liu & Cheng Zhou & Xinsheng Zhang & Yufeng Liu, 2020. "A unified data‐adaptive framework for high dimensional change point detection," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 82(4), pages 933-963, September.
    18. Wingert, Simon & Mboya, Mwasi Paza & Sibbertsen, Philipp, 2020. "Distinguishing between breaks in the mean and breaks in persistence under long memory," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    19. Matúš Maciak & Sebastiano Vitali, 2024. "Using interpolated implied volatility for analysing exogenous market changes," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-21, June.
    20. Lazar, Emese & Wang, Shixuan & Xue, Xiaohan, 2023. "Loss function-based change point detection in risk measures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(1), pages 415-431.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jmvana:v:169:y:2019:i:c:p:33-48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.