IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jmvana/v132y2014icp138-150.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lasso penalized model selection criteria for high-dimensional multivariate linear regression analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Katayama, Shota
  • Imori, Shinpei

Abstract

This paper proposes two model selection criteria for identifying relevant predictors in the high-dimensional multivariate linear regression analysis. The proposed criteria are based on a Lasso type penalized likelihood function to allow the high-dimensionality. Under the asymptotic framework that the dimension of multiple responses goes to infinity while the maximum size of candidate models has smaller order of the sample size, it is shown that the proposed criteria have the model selection consistency, that is, they can asymptotically pick out the true model. Simulation studies show that the proposed criteria outperform existing criteria when the dimension of multiple responses is large.

Suggested Citation

  • Katayama, Shota & Imori, Shinpei, 2014. "Lasso penalized model selection criteria for high-dimensional multivariate linear regression analysis," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 138-150.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jmvana:v:132:y:2014:i:c:p:138-150
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jmva.2014.08.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047259X14001845
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jmva.2014.08.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hansheng Wang & Bo Li & Chenlei Leng, 2009. "Shrinkage tuning parameter selection with a diverging number of parameters," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(3), pages 671-683, June.
    2. Kubokawa, Tatsuya & Srivastava, Muni S., 2008. "Estimation of the precision matrix of a singular Wishart distribution and its application in high-dimensional data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 99(9), pages 1906-1928, October.
    3. Jiahua Chen & Zehua Chen, 2008. "Extended Bayesian information criteria for model selection with large model spaces," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 95(3), pages 759-771.
    4. Zhang, Yiyun & Li, Runze & Tsai, Chih-Ling, 2010. "Regularization Parameter Selections via Generalized Information Criterion," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 105(489), pages 312-323.
    5. Lam, Clifford & Fan, Jianqing, 2009. "Sparsistency and rates of convergence in large covariance matrix estimation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 31540, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Yingying Fan & Cheng Yong Tang, 2013. "Tuning parameter selection in high dimensional penalized likelihood," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 75(3), pages 531-552, June.
    7. Ming Yuan & Yi Lin, 2007. "Model selection and estimation in the Gaussian graphical model," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 94(1), pages 19-35.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Piotr Pokarowski & Wojciech Rejchel & Agnieszka Sołtys & Michał Frej & Jan Mielniczuk, 2022. "Improving Lasso for model selection and prediction," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 49(2), pages 831-863, June.
    2. Zhao, Li & Xu, Xingzhong, 2017. "Generalized canonical correlation variables improved estimation in high dimensional seemingly unrelated regression models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 119-126.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuta Umezu & Yusuke Shimizu & Hiroki Masuda & Yoshiyuki Ninomiya, 2019. "AIC for the non-concave penalized likelihood method," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 71(2), pages 247-274, April.
    2. Kaixu Yang & Tapabrata Maiti, 2022. "Ultrahigh‐dimensional generalized additive model: Unified theory and methods," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 49(3), pages 917-942, September.
    3. Yunxiao Chen & Xiaoou Li & Jingchen Liu & Zhiliang Ying, 2017. "Regularized Latent Class Analysis with Application in Cognitive Diagnosis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(3), pages 660-692, September.
    4. Tae-Hwy Lee & Ekaterina Seregina, 2020. "Learning from Forecast Errors: A New Approach to Forecast Combination," Working Papers 202024, University of California at Riverside, Department of Economics.
    5. Luoying Yang & Tong Tong Wu, 2023. "Model‐based clustering of high‐dimensional longitudinal data via regularization," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(2), pages 761-774, June.
    6. Eun Ryung Lee & Hohsuk Noh & Byeong U. Park, 2014. "Model Selection via Bayesian Information Criterion for Quantile Regression Models," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 109(505), pages 216-229, March.
    7. Mingli Chen & Kengo Kato & Chenlei Leng, 2021. "Analysis of networks via the sparse β‐model," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 83(5), pages 887-910, November.
    8. Jack Jewson & Li Li & Laura Battaglia & Stephen Hansen & David Rossell & Piotr Zwiernik, 2022. "Graphical model inference with external network data," CeMMAP working papers 20/22, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    9. Chun Wang, 2021. "Using Penalized EM Algorithm to Infer Learning Trajectories in Latent Transition CDM," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(1), pages 167-189, March.
    10. Chen, Yunxiao & Li, Xiaoou & Liu, Jingchen & Ying, Zhiliang, 2017. "Regularized latent class analysis with application in cognitive diagnosis," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103182, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Burman, Prabir & Paul, Debashis, 2017. "Smooth predictive model fitting in regression," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 165-179.
    12. Guo, Xiao & Chen, Yu & Tang, Cheng Yong, 2023. "Information criteria for latent factor models: A study on factor pervasiveness and adaptivity," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 233(1), pages 237-250.
    13. repec:cte:wsrepe:24534 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Eduardo F. Mendes & Gabriel J. P. Pinto, 2023. "Generalized Information Criteria for Structured Sparse Models," Papers 2309.01764, arXiv.org.
    15. Yingying Fan & Cheng Yong Tang, 2013. "Tuning parameter selection in high dimensional penalized likelihood," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 75(3), pages 531-552, June.
    16. Fan, Rui & Lee, Ji Hyung & Shin, Youngki, 2023. "Predictive quantile regression with mixed roots and increasing dimensions: The ALQR approach," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 237(2).
    17. Gaorong Li & Liugen Xue & Heng Lian, 2012. "SCAD-penalised generalised additive models with non-polynomial dimensionality," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 681-697.
    18. Emre Demirkaya & Yang Feng & Pallavi Basu & Jinchi Lv, 2022. "Large-scale model selection in misspecified generalized linear models [Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle]," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 109(1), pages 123-136.
    19. Benjamin Poignard & Manabu Asai, 2023. "Estimation of high-dimensional vector autoregression via sparse precision matrix," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 26(2), pages 307-326.
    20. Huangdi Yi & Qingzhao Zhang & Cunjie Lin & Shuangge Ma, 2022. "Information‐incorporated Gaussian graphical model for gene expression data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(2), pages 512-523, June.
    21. Zhang, Ting & Wang, Lei, 2020. "Smoothed empirical likelihood inference and variable selection for quantile regression with nonignorable missing response," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jmvana:v:132:y:2014:i:c:p:138-150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.