IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jmvana/v102y2011i4p816-827.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tests for independence in non-parametric heteroscedastic regression models

Author

Listed:
  • Hlávka, Zdenek
  • Husková, Marie
  • Meintanis, Simos G.

Abstract

Consistent procedures are constructed for testing independence between the regressor and the error in non-parametric regression models. The tests are based on the Fourier formulation of independence, and utilize the joint and the marginal empirical characteristic functions of the regressor and of estimated residuals. The asymptotic null distribution as well as the behavior of the test statistic under alternatives is investigated. A simulation study compares bootstrap versions of the proposed tests to corresponding procedures utilizing the empirical distribution function.

Suggested Citation

  • Hlávka, Zdenek & Husková, Marie & Meintanis, Simos G., 2011. "Tests for independence in non-parametric heteroscedastic regression models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 102(4), pages 816-827, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jmvana:v:102:y:2011:i:4:p:816-827
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047-259X(11)00003-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Einmahl, John H.J. & Van Keilegom, Ingrid, 2008. "Specification tests in nonparametric regression," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 88-102, March.
    2. Bilodeau, M. & Lafaye de Micheaux, P., 2005. "A multivariate empirical characteristic function test of independence with normal marginals," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(2), pages 345-369, August.
    3. Meintanis, Simos G. & Iliopoulos, George, 2008. "Fourier methods for testing multivariate independence," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(4), pages 1884-1895, January.
    4. Marie Hušková & Simos Meintanis, 2010. "Tests for the error distribution in nonparametric possibly heteroscedastic regression models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 19(1), pages 92-112, May.
    5. Neumeyer, Natalie, 2009. "Testing independence in nonparametric regression," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(7), pages 1551-1566, August.
    6. Einmahl, J.H.J. & van Keilegom, I., 2006. "Tests for Independence in Nonparametric Regression," Other publications TiSEM 0c6f2c43-aa7d-45c1-9d43-7, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. M. D. Jiménez-Gamero & J. L. Moreno-Rebollo & J. A. Mayor-Gallego, 2018. "On the estimation of the characteristic function in finite populations with applications," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 27(1), pages 95-121, March.
    2. Hušková, Marie & Meintanis, Simos G. & Pretorius, Charl, 2020. "Tests for validity of the semiparametric heteroskedastic transformation model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    3. Florens, Jean-Pierre & Simar, Léopold & Van Keilegom, Ingrid, 2014. "Frontier estimation in nonparametric location-scale models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 178(P3), pages 456-470.
    4. Simos Meintanis, 2013. "Comments on: An updated review of Goodness-of-Fit tests for regression models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(3), pages 432-436, September.
    5. Wenceslao González-Manteiga & Rosa Crujeiras, 2013. "Rejoinder on: An updated review of Goodness-of-Fit tests for regression models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(3), pages 442-447, September.
    6. Van Keilegom, Ingrid, 2013. "Discussion on: "An updated review of Goodness-of-Fit tests for regression models" (by W. Gonzales-Manteiga and R.M. Crujeiras)," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2013008, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    7. Sankar, Subhra & Bergsma, Wicher & Dassios, Angelos, 2017. "Testing independence of covariates and errors in nonparametric regression," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 83780, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Simar, Léopold & Vanhems, Anne & Van Keilegom, Ingrid, 2016. "Unobserved heterogeneity and endogeneity in nonparametric frontier estimation," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 190(2), pages 360-373.
    9. Meintanis, Simos G. & Hušková, Marie & Hlávka, Zdeněk, 2022. "Fourier-type tests of mutual independence between functional time series," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    10. Chen, Feifei & Meintanis, Simos G. & Zhu, Lixing, 2019. "On some characterizations and multidimensional criteria for testing homogeneity, symmetry and independence," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 125-144.
    11. Ingrid Van Keilegom, 2013. "Comments on: An updated review of Goodness-of-Fit tests for regression models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(3), pages 428-431, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Neumeyer, Natalie & Noh, Hohsuk & Van Keilegom, Ingrid, 2014. "Heteroscedastic semiparametric transformation models: estimation and testing for validity," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2014047, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    2. Simar, Léopold & Vanhems, Anne & Van Keilegom, Ingrid, 2016. "Unobserved heterogeneity and endogeneity in nonparametric frontier estimation," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 190(2), pages 360-373.
    3. Florens, Jean-Pierre & Simar, Léopold & Van Keilegom, Ingrid, 2014. "Frontier estimation in nonparametric location-scale models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 178(P3), pages 456-470.
    4. Sankar, Subhra & Bergsma, Wicher & Dassios, Angelos, 2017. "Testing independence of covariates and errors in nonparametric regression," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 83780, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Teran Hidalgo, Sebastian J. & Wu, Michael C. & Engel, Stephanie M. & Kosorok, Michael R., 2018. "Goodness-of-fit test for nonparametric regression models: Smoothing spline ANOVA models as example," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 135-155.
    6. Van Keilegom, Ingrid, 2013. "Discussion on: "An updated review of Goodness-of-Fit tests for regression models" (by W. Gonzales-Manteiga and R.M. Crujeiras)," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2013008, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    7. Ingrid Van Keilegom, 2013. "Comments on: An updated review of Goodness-of-Fit tests for regression models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(3), pages 428-431, September.
    8. Fan, Caiyun & Lu, Wenbin & Zhou, Yong, 2021. "Testing error heterogeneity in censored linear regression," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    9. Simos G. Meintanis & Joseph Ngatchou-Wandji & James Allison, 2018. "Testing for serial independence in vector autoregressive models," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 59(4), pages 1379-1410, December.
    10. Braekers, Roel & Van Keilegom, Ingrid, 2009. "Flexible modeling based on copulas in nonparametric median regression," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(6), pages 1270-1281, July.
    11. Mastromarco, Camilla & Simar, Léopold, 2018. "Globalization and productivity: A robust nonparametric world frontier analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 134-149.
    12. Natalie Neumeyer & Ingrid Van Keilegom, 2009. "Change‐Point Tests for the Error Distribution in Non‐parametric Regression," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 36(3), pages 518-541, September.
    13. Fan, Yanan & de Micheaux, Pierre Lafaye & Penev, Spiridon & Salopek, Donna, 2017. "Multivariate nonparametric test of independence," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 189-210.
    14. Escanciano, Juan Carlos & Jacho-Chávez, David T., 2012. "n-uniformly consistent density estimation in nonparametric regression models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 167(2), pages 305-316.
    15. Neumeyer, Natalie, 2009. "Testing independence in nonparametric regression," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(7), pages 1551-1566, August.
    16. Chen, Feifei & Meintanis, Simos G. & Zhu, Lixing, 2019. "On some characterizations and multidimensional criteria for testing homogeneity, symmetry and independence," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 125-144.
    17. Jun Zhang & Zhenghui Feng & Peirong Xu, 2015. "Estimating the conditional single-index error distribution with a partial linear mean regression," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 24(1), pages 61-83, March.
    18. Hušková, Marie & Meintanis, Simos G. & Pretorius, Charl, 2020. "Tests for validity of the semiparametric heteroskedastic transformation model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    19. Y. Andriyana & I. Gijbels & A. Verhasselt, 2018. "Quantile regression in varying-coefficient models: non-crossing quantile curves and heteroscedasticity," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 59(4), pages 1589-1621, December.
    20. Tahani Coolen-Maturi, 2016. "New weighted rank correlation coefficients sensitive to agreement on top and bottom rankings," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(12), pages 2261-2279, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jmvana:v:102:y:2011:i:4:p:816-827. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.