IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jfpoli/v21y1996i6p527-539.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The AMS in agricultural trade negotiations: a review

Author

Listed:
  • Silvis, H. J.
  • van der Hamsvoort, C. P. C. M.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Silvis, H. J. & van der Hamsvoort, C. P. C. M., 1996. "The AMS in agricultural trade negotiations: a review," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 21(6), pages 527-539, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:21:y:1996:i:6:p:527-539
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0306-9192(96)00022-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schwartz, Nancy E. & Parker, Stephen, 1988. "Measuring Government Intervention In Agriculture For The Gatt Negotiations," 1988 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Knoxville, Tennessee 270318, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. C. Ford Runge & Heimpel Stanton, 1988. "The Political Economy of the Uruguay Round Negotiations: A View from Geneva," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 70(5), pages 1146-1152.
    3. Ballenger, Nicole, 1988. "PSEs: What They Are And Their Role In Trade Negotiations," Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 3(1), pages 1-2.
    4. Nancy E. Schwartz & Stephen Parker, 1988. "Measuring Government Intervention in Agriculture for the GATT Negotiations," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 70(5), pages 1137-1145.
    5. Thomas W. Hertel, 1989. "PSEs and the Mix of Measures to Support Farm Incomes," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(1), pages 17-28, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Oskam, Arie J. & Meester, Gerrit, 2006. "How useful is the PSE in determining agricultural support?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 123-141, April.
    2. Robert Wolfe, 2021. "Yours is bigger than mine! Could an index like the Producer Subsidy Equivalent help in understanding the comparative incidence of industrial subsidies?," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(2), pages 328-345, February.
    3. Sumner, Daniel A., 2000. "Domestic support and the WTO negotiations," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 44(3), pages 1-18.
    4. Robert Wolfe, 2020. "Yours is Bigger than Mine! Could an Index like the PSE Help in Understanding the Comparative Incidence of Industrial Subsidies?," RSCAS Working Papers 2020/52, European University Institute.
    5. Erjavec, Emil & Rednak, Miroslav & Volk, Tina, 1998. "The European Union enlargement - the case of agriculture in Slovenia," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 23(5), pages 395-409, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bickerton, Thomas W. & Glauber, Joseph W., 1990. "World Oilseed Markets--Government Intervention and Multilateral Policy Reform," Staff Reports 278284, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Buckley, Katharine C., 1990. "The World Market in Fresh Fruit and Vegetables, Wine, and Tropical Beverages-- Government Intervention and Multilateral Policy Reform," Staff Reports 278348, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Harwood, Joy L. & Bailey, Kenneth W., 1990. "The World Wheat Market--Government Intervention and Multilateral Policy Reform," Staff Reports 278264, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Wiebelt, Manfred & Herrmann, Roland & Schenck, Patricia & Thiele, Rainer, 1992. "Discrimination against agriculture in developing countries?," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 458, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    5. D. MacLaren, 1991. "Agricultural Trade Policy Analysis And International Trade Theory: A Review Of Recent Developments," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(3), pages 250-297, September.
    6. Skully, David W., 1990. "Government Intervention in Agriculture: A Regulatory Approach," Staff Reports 278332, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    7. Runge, C. Ford, 1990. "Prospects For The Uruguay Round In Agriculture," Staff Papers 14094, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    8. Karl D. Meilke & Don McClatchy & Harry de Gorter, 1996. "Challenges in quantitative economic analysis in support of multilateral trade negotiations," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 14(3), pages 185-200, August.
    9. Runge, C. Ford, 1989. "Agricultural Trade In The Uruguay Round: Into Final Battle," Staff Papers 13951, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    10. Kobayashi, S. & Morison, Julian B. & Riethmuller, Paul C., 1991. "A Review of Recent Developments in Japanese Agriculture and Agricultural Policy," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 59(03), pages 1-21, December.
    11. Gautam, Virender, 1992. "Identification of patterns of producer and consumer protection levels in food commodities: a cross-country, aggregate and commodity-specific analysis," ISU General Staff Papers 1992010108000017588, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    12. Clark, Don P., 1992. "Non-Tariff Measures And Industrial Nation Imports Of Agricultural Products," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(1), pages 225-232, July.
    13. Short, Cameron, 2002. "A Methodology to Evaluate the Impact of Cost Recovery in Canadian Agriculture and Agri-Food Chains," Economic and Market Information 54496, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.
    14. Runge, C. Ford, 0. "Agricultural Trade In The Uruguay Round: Into Final Battle," Increasing Understanding of Public Problems and Policies, Farm Foundation.
    15. Ballenger, Nicole, 1988. "Agricultural Policy Reform In The Uruguay Round: Proceedings Of A Workshop On Economic Issues And Research Needs," Staff Reports 278062, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    16. Erjavec, Emil & Rednak, Miroslav & Volk, Tina, 1998. "The European Union enlargement - the case of agriculture in Slovenia," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 23(5), pages 395-409, October.
    17. Agriculture and Trade Analysis Division, 1988. "Agriculture In The Uruguay Round: Analyses Of Government Support," Staff Reports 278064, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    18. Daniele Moro & Paolo Sckokai & Claudio Soregaroli, 2002. "Distributive Effects of the Cap in the Italian Livestock Sector," QA - Rivista dell'Associazione Rossi-Doria, Associazione Rossi Doria, issue 3, November.
    19. Liapis, Peter S., 1998. "Government Policies And Their Effects On Resource Use In The U.S. Grain And Oilseed Sectors," 1998 Annual meeting, August 2-5, Salt Lake City, UT 20861, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:21:y:1996:i:6:p:527-539. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/foodpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.