IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jebusi/v89y2017icp1-12.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Market adaptation to Regulation Fair Disclosure: The use of industry information to enhance the informational environment

Author

Listed:
  • Yu, Susana
  • Webb, Gwendolyn

Abstract

Our fundamental research interest is in exploring the ways in which the financial markets have adapted to Reg FD, and our particular focus is on how market participants use industry information embedded in firms’ earnings announcements. We find that announcements of quarterly earnings made by companies that are the first in their industry to report in a given quarter have significant effects on the stock returns of other firms in the same industry as well as on their own stock returns. We then test the implications of these findings for their effects on the information environment. Overall, our empirical findings support the conclusion that the implementation of Reg FD has led to increased use of industry information that is revealed in earnings announcements. This is one way, among others, in which analysts and other market participants have adapted to the requirements of Reg FD. In this case, they have made the adaptation by developing new uses of public information to enhance the informational environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu, Susana & Webb, Gwendolyn, 2017. "Market adaptation to Regulation Fair Disclosure: The use of industry information to enhance the informational environment," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 1-12.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jebusi:v:89:y:2017:i:c:p:1-12
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconbus.2016.10.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148619516300625
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2016.10.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anup Agrawal & Sahiba Chadha & Mark A. Chen, 2006. "Who Is Afraid of Reg FD? The Behavior and Performance of Sell-Side Analysts Following the SEC's Fair Disclosure Rules," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 79(6), pages 2811-2834, November.
    2. Baljit Sidhu & Tom Smith & Robert E. Whaley & Richard H. Willis, 2008. "Regulation Fair Disclosure and the Cost of Adverse Selection," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(3), pages 697-728, June.
    3. Sanjeev Bhojraj & Young Jun Cho & Nir Yehuda, 2012. "Mutual Fund Family Size and Mutual Fund Performance: The Role of Regulatory Changes," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(3), pages 647-684, June.
    4. Partha S. Mohanram & Shyam V. Sunder, 2006. "How Has Regulation FD Affected the Operations of Financial Analysts?," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(2), pages 491-525, June.
    5. Jorion, Philippe & Zhang, Gaiyan, 2007. "Good and bad credit contagion: Evidence from credit default swaps," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(3), pages 860-883, June.
    6. Anna Agapova & Jeff Madura & Zhanel Mailibayeva, 2012. "Does Regulation Fair Disclosure Reduce the Information Quality of Managerial Guidance?," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 47(2), pages 273-297, May.
    7. Marcel Prokopczuk, 2010. "Intra-industry contagion effects of earnings surprises in the banking sector," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(20), pages 1601-1613.
    8. Aigbe Akhigbe & Jeff Madura & Melinda Newman, 2006. "Industry Effects Of Analyst Stock Revisions," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 29(2), pages 181-198, June.
    9. Green, T. Clifton & Jame, Russell & Markov, Stanimir & Subasi, Musa, 2014. "Access to management and the informativeness of analyst research," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(2), pages 239-255.
    10. Dave Jackson & Jeff Madura, 2007. "Impact of regulation fair disclosure on the information flow associated with profit warnings," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 31(1), pages 59-74, March.
    11. Roger K. Loh & René M. Stulz, 2011. "When Are Analyst Recommendation Changes Influential?," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 24(2), pages 593-627.
    12. Kross, William J. & Suk, Inho, 2012. "Does Regulation FD work? Evidence from analysts' reliance on public disclosure," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 225-248.
    13. Li, Yutao & Saunders, Anthony & Shao, Pei, 2015. "Did Regulation Fair Disclosure affect credit markets?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 46-59.
    14. Mensah, Yaw M. & Yang, Rong, 2008. "An empirical evaluation of analysts' herding behavior following Regulation Fair Disclosure," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 317-338.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. BC, Bishal & Esfahani, Sharif, 2020. "The role of debt contracts in analyst earnings forecasts," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cowan, Arnold R. & Salotti, Valentina, 2020. "Anti-selective disclosure regulation and analyst forecast accuracy and usefulness," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    2. John L. Campbell & Brady J. Twedt & Benjamin C. Whipple, 2021. "Trading Prior to the Disclosure of Material Information: Evidence from Regulation Fair Disclosure Form 8‐Ks," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(1), pages 412-442, March.
    3. Smith, Antoinette L. & Alfonso, Elio & Hogan, Robert, 2018. "The impact of an SEC investigation on conference call participation and analysts’ forecast quality," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 148-158.
    4. Ryan D. Leece & Todd P. White, 2017. "The effects of firms’ information environment on analysts’ herding behavior," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 503-525, February.
    5. Viktoriya Lantushenko & Edward Nelling, 2021. "Do more active funds still earn higher performance? Evidence from Active Share over time," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 44(4), pages 725-752, December.
    6. BC, Bishal & Esfahani, Sharif, 2020. "The role of debt contracts in analyst earnings forecasts," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    7. Jin, Shunyao & Kimbrough, Michael D. & Wang, Isabel Yanyan, 2024. "Privileged information access, analyst consensus building, and stock return volatility: Evidence from the JOBS Act," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    8. Beixin Lin & Rong Yang, 2012. "Does Regulation Fair Disclosure affect analysts’ forecast performance? The case of restructuring firms," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 38(4), pages 495-517, May.
    9. Dambra, Michael & Field, Laura Casares & Gustafson, Matthew T. & Pisciotta, Kevin, 2018. "The consequences to analyst involvement in the IPO process: Evidence surrounding the JOBS Act," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 302-330.
    10. Yongtae Kim & Minsup Song, 2015. "Management Earnings Forecasts and Value of Analyst Forecast Revisions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(7), pages 1663-1683, July.
    11. Cristi Gleason & Zhejia Ling & Rong Zhao, 2020. "Selective disclosure and the role of Form 8‐K in the post‐Reg FD era," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(3-4), pages 365-396, March.
    12. Galanti, Sébastien & Vaubourg, Anne Gaël, 2017. "Optimism bias in financial analysts' earnings forecasts: Do commissions sharing agreements reduce conflicts of interest?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 325-337.
    13. Donker, Han & Ng, Alex & Shao, Pei, 2020. "Borrower distress and the efficiency of relationship banking," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    14. Sean Cleary & Jonathan Jona & Gladys Lee & Joshua Shemesh, 2020. "Underlying risk preferences and analyst risk‐taking behavior," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(7-8), pages 949-981, July.
    15. Surya Chelikani & Frank P. D'Souza, 2014. "The Effect of Regulation Fair Disclosure on Market Integration," The International Journal of Business and Finance Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 8(4), pages 43-62.
    16. Luong, Thanh Son & Qiu, Buhui & Wu, Yi (Ava), 2021. "Does it pay to be socially connected with wall street brokerages? Evidence from cost of equity," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    17. Albring, Susan & Huang, Shawn & Pereira, Raynolde & Xu, Xiaolu, 2020. "Disclosure and liquidity management: Evidence from regulation fair disclosure," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(3).
    18. Beyer, Anne & Cohen, Daniel A. & Lys, Thomas Z. & Walther, Beverly R., 2010. "The financial reporting environment: Review of the recent literature," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(2-3), pages 296-343, December.
    19. Ryan Chacon & Dan French & Kuntara Pukthuanthong, 2018. "The Information Content of Analysts' Net Asset Value Estimates: The Case of Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)," ERES eres2018_82, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    20. Hueiling Chen & Cheng-Tsu Huang & Hsiou-Wei W. Lin, 2016. "Changes in analyst following for less covered firms accompanying Regulation Fair Disclosure: the roles of ability and industry experience," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 519-541, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Reg FD; Earnings Announcements; Earnings Surprises; Industry Contagion; Industry Competition;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading
    • G18 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jebusi:v:89:y:2017:i:c:p:1-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-economics-and-business .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.