IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jebusi/v128y2024ics0148619523000516.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovating microcredit: how fintechs change the field

Author

Listed:
  • Leite, Rodrigo
  • Mendes, Layla
  • Camelo, Emmanuel

Abstract

We explore the relationship between traditional microfinance screening variables and a new one (job experience) for a Brazilian fintech microcredit firm, which developed a strategy that targets poor workers using the clients’ job contracts as collateral and by implementing a 100% online application. A total of 911 contracts were analyzed. Unlike previous studies, we show that the main variable used for screening is job experience: borrowers with lengthy experience in their current jobs received larger loans with lower interest rates while maintaining smaller delinquencies. Additionally, we find that women receive lower interest rates and longer loan durations because of their job experience. We theorize that job experience helps to reduce the “collateral gap” between genders in Brazilian microcredit markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Leite, Rodrigo & Mendes, Layla & Camelo, Emmanuel, 2024. "Innovating microcredit: how fintechs change the field," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jebusi:v:128:y:2024:i:c:s0148619523000516
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconbus.2023.106158
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148619523000516
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2023.106158?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bhatt, V. V., 1989. "Financial innovation and credit market development," Policy Research Working Paper Series 52, The World Bank.
    2. Ahelegbey, Daniel & Giudici, Paolo & Pediroda, Valentino, 2023. "A network based fintech inclusion platform," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PB).
    3. Gulamhuseinwala, Imran & Bull, Thomas & Lewis, Steven, 2015. "FinTech is gaining traction and young, high-income users are the early adopters," Journal of Financial Perspectives, EY Global FS Institute, vol. 3(3), pages 16-23.
    4. Abadie, Alberto & Imbens, Guido W., 2011. "Bias-Corrected Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 29(1), pages 1-11.
    5. Cumming, Douglas J. & Sewaid, Ahmed, 2021. "FinTech loans, self-employment, and financial performance," CFS Working Paper Series 667, Center for Financial Studies (CFS).
    6. Cheng, We Geng & Leite, Rodrigo de Oliveira & Caldieraro, Fabio, 2022. "Financial contagion in internet lending platforms: Who pays the price?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    7. Matthieu Chemin & Joost de Laat, 2013. "Can Warm Glow Alleviate Credit Market Failures? Evidence from Online Peer-to-Peer Lenders," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 61(4), pages 825-858.
    8. Beatriz Armendáriz & Jonathan Morduch, 2010. "The Economics of Microfinance, Second Edition," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 2, volume 1, number 0262014106, December.
    9. Suraya Hanim Mokhtar & Gilbert Nartea & Christopher Gan, 2012. "Determinants of microcredit loans repayment problem among microfinance borrowers in Malaysia," International Journal of Business and Social Research, LAR Center Press, vol. 2(7), pages 33-45, December.
    10. Erik Feyen & Jon Frost & Leonardo Gambacorta & Harish Natarajan & Matthew Saal, 2021. "Fintech and the digital transformation of financial services: implications for market structure and public policy," BIS Papers, Bank for International Settlements, number 117.
    11. Maier, Erik, 2016. "Supply and demand on crowdlending platforms: connecting small and medium-sized enterprise borrowers and consumer investors," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 143-153.
    12. Chen, Xiao & Chong, Zhaohui & Giudici, Paolo & Huang, Bihong, 2022. "Network centrality effects in peer to peer lending," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 600(C).
    13. Ahelegbey, Daniel Felix & Giudici, Paolo & Hadji-Misheva, Branka, 2019. "Latent factor models for credit scoring in P2P systems," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 522(C), pages 112-121.
    14. Arcand, Jean-Louis & McDonald, Stuart, 2018. "Credit markets with imperfect information: Risk-aversion versus pessimism," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 35-38.
    15. William Jack & Tavneet Suri, 2011. "Mobile Money: The Economics of M-PESA," NBER Working Papers 16721, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Mingfeng Lin & Nagpurnanand R. Prabhala & Siva Viswanathan, 2013. "Judging Borrowers by the Company They Keep: Friendship Networks and Information Asymmetry in Online Peer-to-Peer Lending," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(1), pages 17-35, August.
    17. Rachel Croson & Uri Gneezy, 2009. "Gender Differences in Preferences," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 47(2), pages 448-474, June.
    18. Ibtissem Baklouti, 2013. "Determinants of Microcredit Repayment: The Case of Tunisian Microfinance Bank," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 25(3), pages 370-382, September.
    19. Chaudhary, M. Ali & Ishfaq, Mohammad, 2003. "Credit worthiness of rural borrowers of Pakistan," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 675-684, December.
    20. David R. Mason, 2014. "Who Gets What? Determinants Of Loan Size And Credit Rationing Among Microcredit Borrowers: Evidence From Nicaragua," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(1), pages 77-90, January.
    21. Rodrigo de O. Leite & Jamil Civitarese, 2019. "Microfinance for women: Are there economic reasons? Evidence from Latin America," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 39(1), pages 571-580.
    22. Agarwal, Shivam & Muckley, Cal B. & Neelakantan, Parvati, 2023. "Countering racial discrimination in algorithmic lending: A case for model-agnostic interpretation methods," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    23. Susanne Soederberg, 2013. "Universalising Financial Inclusion and the Securitisation of Development," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(4), pages 593-612.
    24. Babaei, Golnoosh & Giudici, Paolo & Raffinetti, Emanuela, 2023. "Explainable FinTech lending," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 125.
    25. Stiglitz, Joseph E & Weiss, Andrew, 1981. "Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 71(3), pages 393-410, June.
    26. Ibtissem Baklouti, 2013. "Determinants of Microcredit Repayment: The Case of Tunisian Microfinance Bank," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 25(3), pages 370-382.
    27. Bester, Helmut, 1985. "Screening vs. Rationing in Credit Markets with Imperfect Information," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 75(4), pages 850-855, September.
    28. Dinh, Thi Huyen Thanh & Kleimeier, Stefanie, 2007. "A credit scoring model for Vietnam's retail banking market," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 471-495.
    29. Prystav, Fabian, 2016. "Personal information in peer-to-peer loan applications: Is less more?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 9(C), pages 6-19.
    30. Alberto Abadie & Guido W. Imbens, 2006. "Large Sample Properties of Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 74(1), pages 235-267, January.
    31. Daniela Gabor & Sally Brooks, 2017. "The digital revolution in financial inclusion: international development in the fintech era," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 423-436, July.
    32. Rodrigo de Oliveira Leite & Layla dos Santos Mendes & Luiz Claudio Sacramento, 2019. "To profit or not to profit? Assessing financial sustainability outcomes of microfinance institutions," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(3), pages 1287-1299, July.
    33. Nitin Bhatt & Shui–Yan Tang, 2002. "Determinants of Repayment in Microcredit: Evidence from Programs in the United States," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(2), pages 360-376, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiaoxia Jia & Weiyi Guang, 2024. "Can Innovation Improve Corporate ESG Performance? The Moderating Effect of Internal and External Incentives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Li, Zongyuan & Li, Jingya & Chang, Xiao, 2024. "Market uncertainties and too-big-to-fail perception: Evidence from Chinese P2P registration requirements," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bilau, José & St-Pierre, Josée, 2018. "Microcredit repayment in a European context: evidence from Portugal," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 85-96.
    2. Jorge Mota & António Carrizo Moreira & Cristóvão Brandão, 2018. "Determinants of microcredit repayment in Portugal: analysis of borrowers, loans and business projects," Portuguese Economic Journal, Springer;Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestao, vol. 17(3), pages 141-171, November.
    3. Oleksandr Talavera & Haofeng Xu, 2018. "Role of Verification in Peer-to-Peer Lending," Working Papers 2018-25, Swansea University, School of Management.
    4. Salvador Cruz Rambaud & Joaquín López Pascual & Emilio M. Santandreu, 2023. "A socioeconomic approach to the profile of microcredit holders from the Hispanic minority in the USA," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 1-25, December.
    5. Zaiyan Wei & Mingfeng Lin, 2017. "Market Mechanisms in Online Peer-to-Peer Lending," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(12), pages 4236-4257, December.
    6. Hubert Tchakoute Tchuigoua, 2021. "Proximity‐based screening tools and credit rationing: Lessons from a Cameroonian greenfield microfinance institution," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 33(3), pages 506-517, September.
    7. Meishan Jiang & Krishna P. Paudel & Seydina O. Sene, 2022. "Does counter‐guarantee affect microcredit mechanism's performance on repayment? Evidence from Guangzhou, China," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(2), pages 1807-1817, April.
    8. Lucia Dalla Pellegrina & Giorgio Di Maio & Paolo Landoni & Emanuele Rusinà, 2021. "Money management and entrepreneurial training in microfinance: impact on beneficiaries and institutions," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 38(3), pages 1049-1085, October.
    9. de Oliveira Leite, Rodrigo & dos Santos Mendes, Layla & de Lacerda Moreira, Rafael, 2020. "Profit status of microfinance institutions and incentives for earnings management," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    10. Adil EL Fakir & Richard Fairchild & Youssef Lamrani Alaoui & Dora Chan & Mohamed Tkiouat & Zaid Amer, 2024. "Kinship, gender and social links impact on micro group lending defaults," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(2), pages 2527-2542, April.
    11. Nartey Menzo, Benjamin Prince & Mogre, Diana & Asuamah Yeboah, Samuel, 2024. "Beyond Income: The Complexities of Credit Risk in Developing Countries," MPRA Paper 122364, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 20 Sep 2024.
    12. Nina Torm, 2018. "Does union membership pay off?: Evidence from Vietnamese SMEs," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2018-71, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    13. José De Sousa & Guillaume Hollard, 2023. "From Micro to Macro Gender Differences: Evidence from Field Tournaments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(6), pages 3358-3399, June.
    14. Andualem Kassegn & Ebrahim Endris, 2022. "Factors affecting loan repayment rate among smallholder farmers got loans from the Amhara Credit and Saving Institution: In the case of Habru District, Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 25(1), pages 73-96, March.
    15. Baumöhl, Eduard & Lyócsa, Štefan & Vašaničová, Petra, 2024. "Macroeconomic environment and the future performance of loans: Evidence from three peer-to-peer platforms," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PB).
    16. Faten Ben Slimane & Antoine Rousseau, 2020. "Crowdlending Campaigns for Renewable Energy: Success Factors," Post-Print hal-02371926, HAL.
    17. Dorfleitner, G. & Just-Marx, S. & Priberny, C., 2017. "What drives the repayment of agricultural micro loans? Evidence from Nicaragua," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 89-100.
    18. Jesmin Ara & Hossen Md Abu Sufian & Md. Abdul Wahab Sarker, 2024. "An Analysis of Influential Elements of Microcredit Repayment in Covid 19 Crisis: Evidence from Bangladesh," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 36(1), pages 9-19.
    19. Gao, Hongming & Zhu, Hui & Ma, Haiying, 2024. "Peer effect and funding success: Analyzing friendship networks in online credit markets," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    20. Eric Darmon & Nathalie Oriol & Alexandra Rufini, 2022. "Bids for speed: An empirical study of investment strategy automation in a peer-to-business lending platform," Post-Print hal-04397030, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Default; Fintech; Interest rates; Microcredit; Screening;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G29 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jebusi:v:128:y:2024:i:c:s0148619523000516. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-economics-and-business .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.