IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jcjust/v93y2024ics004723522400076x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mental illness, focal concerns, and intersectionality: The relationship between types of mental illness, types of crime, and race and gender in sentencing in state courts

Author

Listed:
  • Piatkowska, Sylwia J.
  • Sohoni, Tracy
  • Paige, Briana

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between mental illness and sentencing in US state courts applying a focal concerns theory framework and incorporating intersectionality. Using ordinary least squares (OLS) modeling and data from the 2016 Survey of Prison Inmates (SPI), our findings support that neglecting the intersectionality of race and gender obscures important variations in the relationship between mental illness and sentence length. We also find important differences in this relationship based on the type of mental illness, with some types of mental illness associated only with longer sentences, others associated only with shorter sentences, and some with both longer and shorter sentences. When examining types of crime, we find longer sentences for individuals with mental illness only in the sentencing of violent crime, but not in sentencing of property, drug, or public order/other crimes. We use the lens of focal concerns theory to advise these findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Piatkowska, Sylwia J. & Sohoni, Tracy & Paige, Briana, 2024. "Mental illness, focal concerns, and intersectionality: The relationship between types of mental illness, types of crime, and race and gender in sentencing in state courts," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:93:y:2024:i:c:s004723522400076x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2024.102227
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004723522400076X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2024.102227?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:93:y:2024:i:c:s004723522400076x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcrimjus .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.