IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jcjust/v38yi5p862-869.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Death penalty views in China, Japan and the U.S.: An empirical comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Jiang, Shanhe
  • Lambert, Eric G.
  • Wang, Jin
  • Saito, Toyoji
  • Pilot, Rebecca

Abstract

Many nations impose the death penalty, yet most of the literature on capital punishment has focused on Western nations, particularly the U.S. China and Japan are two retentionist nations. Based on the data collected in 2005, this study examined the level of death penalty support and views on capital punishment among college students from China, Japan, and the U.S. It was found that Chinese respondents reported the highest level of death penalty support, followed by Japanese and U.S. students. Respondents from China and Japan were more likely to believe in the deterrence value of capital punishment than their U.S. counterparts. Views on retribution differed among the respondents. U.S. students were most likely to feel that innocent people are sentenced to death. In multivariate analyses, deterrence was the strongest correlate of death penalty views among Chinese and Japanese respondents, followed closely by retribution. For both Chinese and Japanese students, the barbarity of government taking the life of a person was the strongest predictor for opposing the death penalty. For U.S. respondents, retribution was the strongest reason for supporting capital punishment and the barbarity of executions was the strongest reason for opposing the death penalty.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiang, Shanhe & Lambert, Eric G. & Wang, Jin & Saito, Toyoji & Pilot, Rebecca, 2010. "Death penalty views in China, Japan and the U.S.: An empirical comparison," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 862-869, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:38:y::i:5:p:862-869
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047-2352(10)00125-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liang, Bin, 2005. "Severe strike campaign in transitional China," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 387-399.
    2. Jiang, Shanhe & Lambert, Eric G. & Nathan, Vincent M., 2009. "Reasons for death penalty attitudes among Chinese citizens: Retributive or instrumental?," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 225-233, May.
    3. Lu, Hong & Zhang, Lening, 2005. "Death penalty in China: The law and the practice," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 367-376.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Watamura, Eiichiro & Ioku, Tomohiro, 2023. "Japanese public opinion on reporting the real names of juvenile criminals: An examination from the perspective of justification preferences," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    2. Eiichiro Watamura & Tomohiro Ioku, 2023. "Wrongful Conviction Rates and Death Penalty Support: Acceptability Hypothesis in Japan," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, August.
    3. Liu, Zhuang, 2022. "The internet echo chamber and the misinformation of judges: The case of judges’ perception of public support for the death penalty in China," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    4. Behnken, Monic P. & Caudill, Jonathan W. & Berg, Mark T. & Trulson, Chad R. & DeLisi, Matt, 2011. "Marked for Death: An Empirical Criminal Careers Analysis of Death Sentences in a Sample of Convicted Male Homicide Offenders," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 471-478.
    5. Jiang, Shanhe & Lambert, Eric G. & Liu, Jianhong & Saito, Toyoji, 2014. "Formal and informal control views in China, Japan, and the U.S," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 36-44.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jennings, Wesley G. & Richards, Tara N. & Dwayne Smith, M. & Bjerregaard, Beth & Fogel, Sondra J., 2014. "A Critical Examination of the “White Victim Effect” and Death Penalty Decision-Making from a Propensity Score Matching Approach: The North Carolina Experience," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 42(5), pages 384-398.
    2. Jiang, Shanhe & Lambert, Eric G. & Nathan, Vincent M., 2009. "Reasons for death penalty attitudes among Chinese citizens: Retributive or instrumental?," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 225-233, May.
    3. Lijun Su & Junshang Liang, 2021. "Understanding China’s New Dual Circulation Development Strategy: A Marxian Input-Output Analysis," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 53(4), pages 590-599, December.
    4. Behnken, Monic P. & Caudill, Jonathan W. & Berg, Mark T. & Trulson, Chad R. & DeLisi, Matt, 2011. "Marked for Death: An Empirical Criminal Careers Analysis of Death Sentences in a Sample of Convicted Male Homicide Offenders," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 471-478.
    5. Ji Li, 2015. "The Leviathan's Rule by Law," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(4), pages 815-846, December.
    6. Liang, Bin & Lu, Hong & Taylor, Melanie, 2009. "Female drug abusers, narcotics offenders, and legal punishment in China," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 133-141, March.
    7. Jiang, Shanhe & Lambert, Eric & Wang, Jin, 2007. "Correlates of formal and informal social/crime control in China: An exploratory study," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 261-271.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:38:y::i:5:p:862-869. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcrimjus .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.