IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jcjust/v37yi3p225-233.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reasons for death penalty attitudes among Chinese citizens: Retributive or instrumental?

Author

Listed:
  • Jiang, Shanhe
  • Lambert, Eric G.
  • Nathan, Vincent M.

Abstract

There is strong support for the death penalty in China; the reasons behind the support, however, are unclear. Retribution and the instrumental perspectives are two major reasons for pro-death penalty attitudes in the United States. Two survey-based studies partially examined whether these two perspectives are also the reasons behind pro-death penalty attitudes in China. Those studies, however, were limited to college students. Using a survey data of 108 regular citizens from different areas and occupations, this study found that both instrumental and retributive perspectives are predictors of pro-death penalty attitudes, and that the former is stronger than the latter.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiang, Shanhe & Lambert, Eric G. & Nathan, Vincent M., 2009. "Reasons for death penalty attitudes among Chinese citizens: Retributive or instrumental?," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 225-233, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:37:y::i:3:p:225-233
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047-2352(09)00039-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Payne, Brian K. & Gainey, Randy R. & Triplett, Ruth A. & Danner, Mona J. E., 2004. "What drives punitive beliefs?: Demographic characteristics and justifications for sentencing," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 195-206.
    2. Lu, Hong & Zhang, Lening, 2005. "Death penalty in China: The law and the practice," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 367-376.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiang, Shanhe & Lambert, Eric G. & Wang, Jin & Saito, Toyoji & Pilot, Rebecca, 2010. "Death penalty views in China, Japan and the U.S.: An empirical comparison," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 862-869, September.
    2. Behnken, Monic P. & Caudill, Jonathan W. & Berg, Mark T. & Trulson, Chad R. & DeLisi, Matt, 2011. "Marked for Death: An Empirical Criminal Careers Analysis of Death Sentences in a Sample of Convicted Male Homicide Offenders," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 471-478.
    3. Jennings, Wesley G. & Richards, Tara N. & Dwayne Smith, M. & Bjerregaard, Beth & Fogel, Sondra J., 2014. "A Critical Examination of the “White Victim Effect” and Death Penalty Decision-Making from a Propensity Score Matching Approach: The North Carolina Experience," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 42(5), pages 384-398.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Douhou, Salima & Magnus, Jan R. & van Soest, Arthur, 2011. "The perception of small crime," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 749-763.
    2. Buckler, Kevin & Cullen, Francis T. & Unnever, James D., 2007. "Citizen assessment of local criminal courts: Does fairness matter?," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 524-536.
    3. Jennings, Wesley G. & Richards, Tara N. & Dwayne Smith, M. & Bjerregaard, Beth & Fogel, Sondra J., 2014. "A Critical Examination of the “White Victim Effect” and Death Penalty Decision-Making from a Propensity Score Matching Approach: The North Carolina Experience," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 42(5), pages 384-398.
    4. Mancini, Christina & Mears, Daniel P., 2010. "To execute or not to execute? Examining public support for capital punishment of sex offenders," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 959-968, September.
    5. Schoepfer, Andrea & Carmichael, Stephanie & Piquero, Nicole Leeper, 2007. "Do perceptions of punishment vary between white-collar and street crimes?," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 151-163.
    6. Jiang, Shanhe & Lambert, Eric G. & Wang, Jin & Saito, Toyoji & Pilot, Rebecca, 2010. "Death penalty views in China, Japan and the U.S.: An empirical comparison," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 862-869, September.
    7. Mancini, Christina & Shields, Ryan T., 2014. "Notes on a (sex crime) scandal: The impact of media coverage of sexual abuse in the Catholic Church on public opinion," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 221-232.
    8. Biggs, M. Antonia & Becker, Andréa & Schroeder, Rosalyn & Kaller, Shelly & Scott, Karen & Grossman, Daniel & Raifman, Sarah & Ralph, Lauren, 2024. "Support for criminalization of self-managed abortion (SMA): A national representative survey," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
    9. Watamura, Eiichiro & Ioku, Tomohiro, 2023. "Japanese public opinion on reporting the real names of juvenile criminals: An examination from the perspective of justification preferences," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    10. Jiang, Shanhe & Lambert, Eric & Wang, Jin, 2007. "Correlates of formal and informal social/crime control in China: An exploratory study," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 261-271.
    11. Payne, Brian K. & Tewksbury, Richard & Mustaine, Elizabeth Ehrhardt, 2010. "Attitudes about rehabilitating sex offenders: Demographic, victimization, and community-level influences," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 580-588, July.
    12. Wozniak, Kevin H. & Lewis, Andrew R., 2010. "Reexamining the effect of christian denominational affiliation on death penalty support," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 1082-1089, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:37:y::i:3:p:225-233. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcrimjus .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.