IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jcjust/v36yi5p381-388.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining the predictors of juvenile probation officers' rehabilitation orientation

Author

Listed:
  • Lopez, Vera
  • Russell, Margaret

Abstract

According to the importation model, individual attributes such as gender and race influence correctional orientation. In contrast, the work/role model contends that differences in correctional orientation are due to work experiences and environment. The purpose of the present study was to explore whether individual attributes, work-related experiences, and perceptions of one's own cultural competency and juveniles' social supports predicted rehabilitation orientation for one hundred juvenile probation officers working within an organization framework that favored a balanced approach to juvenile justice. Multiple regression results indicated that the importation variables were not predictive of rehabilitation orientation, either as a set or individually. The work/role model and the perception variable sets predicted rehabilitation orientation. Employment type and perceptions of social support were most strongly related to rehabilitation orientation. The study's unique contribution stems from its use of unordered sets analyses to examine the relative validity of theoretical grounded sets of variables.

Suggested Citation

  • Lopez, Vera & Russell, Margaret, 2008. "Examining the predictors of juvenile probation officers' rehabilitation orientation," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 381-388, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:36:y::i:5:p:381-388
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047-2352(08)00084-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jackson, Jerome E. & Ammen, Sue, 1996. "Race and correctional officers' punitive attitudes toward treatment programs for inmates," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 153-166.
    2. Mitchell, Ojmarrh & MacKenzie, Doris Layton & Gover, Angela R. & Styve, Gaylene J., 2001. "The influences of personal background on perceptions of juvenile correctional environments," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 67-76.
    3. Farkas, Mary Ann, 1999. "Correctional officer attitudes toward inmates and working with inmates in a "get tough" era," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 495-506.
    4. Leiber, Michael J. & Schwarze, Kimberly & Mack, Kristin Y. & Farnworth, Margaret, 2002. "The effects of occupation and education on punitive orientations among juvenile justice personnel," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 303-316.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mears, Daniel P. & Cochran, Joshua C. & Greenman, Sarah J. & Bhati, Avinash S. & Greenwald, Mark A., 2011. "Evidence on the Effectiveness of Juvenile Court Sanctions," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 509-520.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katherine A. DeCelles & Michel Anteby, 2020. "Compassion in the Clink: When and How Human Services Workers Overcome Barriers to Care," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(6), pages 1408-1431, November.
    2. Lambert, Eric & Paoline III, Eugene A., 2010. "Take this job and shove it: An exploratory study of turnover intent among jail staff," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 139-148, March.
    3. Auerbach, Stephen M. & Quick, Ben G. & Pegg, Phillip O., 2003. "General job stress and job-specific stress in juvenile correctional officers," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 25-36.
    4. Cao, Liqun & Zhao, Jihong & Van Dine, Steve, 1997. "Prison disciplinary tickets: A test of the deprivation and importation models," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 103-113.
    5. Micucci, Anthony & Monster, Miranda, 2004. "It's about time to hear their stories: Impediments to rehabilitation at a Canadian provincial correctional facility for women," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 515-530.
    6. Eric G. Lambert & Shannon M. Barton-Bellessa & Nancy L. Hogan, 2015. "The Consequences of Emotional Burnout Among Correctional Staff," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(2), pages 21582440155, June.
    7. Moon, Byongook & Maxwell, Sheila Royo, 2004. "The sources and consequences of corrections officers' stress: A South Korean example," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 359-370.
    8. Marcos Misis & Bitna Kim & Kelly Cheeseman & Nancy L. Hogan & Eric G. Lambert, 2013. "The Impact of Correctional Officer Perceptions of Inmates on Job Stress," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(2), pages 21582440134, May.
    9. Farkas, Mary Ann, 1999. "Correctional officer attitudes toward inmates and working with inmates in a "get tough" era," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 495-506.
    10. Dial, Kelly Cheeseman & Downey, Ragan A. & Goodlin, Wendi Elizabeth, 2010. "The job in the joint: The impact of generation and gender on work stress in prison," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 609-615, July.
    11. Young, Jacqueline L. & Antonio, Michael E. & Wingeard, Lisa M., 2009. "How staff attitude and support for inmate treatment and rehabilitation differs by job category: An evaluation of findings from Pennsylvania's Department of Corrections' employee training curriculum 'R," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 435-441, September.
    12. Gebo, Erika & Stracuzzi, Nena F. & Hurst, Valerie, 2006. "Juvenile justice reform and the courtroom workgroup: Issues of perception and workload," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 425-433.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:36:y::i:5:p:381-388. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcrimjus .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.