IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v139y2022icp1211-1217.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How emotional attachment influences lender participation in consumer-to-consumer rental platforms

Author

Listed:
  • Graul, Antje R.H.
  • Brough, Aaron R.
  • Isaac, Mathew S.

Abstract

Given the proliferation of consumer-to-consumer (C2C) rental platforms, it is important to understand the motivations of stakeholders to participate in these platforms. The viability of online C2C platforms depends on the willingness of lenders to list their possessions for rent. We suggest that psychological mechanisms related to emotional attachment may underlie this decision. Specifically, we show that emotional attachment predicts lenders’ concerns about property preservation, such that higher levels of attachment will be associated with a relatively stronger preference for policies focused on product protection (i.e., policies that provide assurance that the product will not be damaged) versus financial guarantees (i.e., policies that provide financial restitution in the event of product damage). Our results extend prior literature by providing insights into how emotional attachment influences lenders’ participation in C2C rental platforms. These findings further highlight practical interventions that platforms might use to increase lender participation. Our work informs practitioners about motivational and behavioral psychological phenomena underlying the emerging C2C business model.

Suggested Citation

  • Graul, Antje R.H. & Brough, Aaron R. & Isaac, Mathew S., 2022. "How emotional attachment influences lender participation in consumer-to-consumer rental platforms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1211-1217.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:139:y:2022:i:c:p:1211-1217
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.064
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014829632100792X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.064?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lutz, Christoph & Newlands, Gemma, 2018. "Consumer segmentation within the sharing economy: The case of Airbnb," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 187-196.
    2. John L. Lastovicka & Karen V. Fernandez, 2005. "Three Paths to Disposition: The Movement of Meaningful Possessions to Strangers," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 31(4), pages 813-823, March.
    3. Lea Dunn & Katherine White & Darren W Dahl & David Glen Mick & Laura A Peracchio, 2020. "A Little Piece of Me: When Mortality Reminders Lead to Giving to Others," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 47(3), pages 431-453.
    4. Grayson, Kent & Shulman, David, 2000. "Indexicality and the Verification Function of Irreplaceable Possessions: A Semiotic Analysis," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 27(1), pages 17-30, June.
    5. Holt, Douglas B, 1995. "How Consumers Consume: A Typology of Consumption Practices," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 22(1), pages 1-16, June.
    6. Aaron C. Ahuvia, 2005. "Beyond the Extended Self: Loved Objects and Consumers' Identity Narratives," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 32(1), pages 171-184, June.
    7. Tengwen Zhang & Mingfeng Tang & Yong Lu & Dayong Dong, 2014. "Trust Building in Online Peer-to-Peer Lending," Journal of Global Information Technology Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 250-266, October.
    8. Samuel P. Fraiberger & Arun Sundararajan, 2015. "Peer-to-Peer Rental Markets in the Sharing Economy," Working Papers 15-19, NET Institute.
    9. Akbar, Payam & Mai, Robert & Hoffmann, Stefan, 2016. "When do materialistic consumers join commercial sharing systems," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 4215-4224.
    10. Strahilevitz, Michal A & Loewenstein, George, 1998. "The Effect of Ownership History on the Valuation of Objects," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 25(3), pages 276-289, December.
    11. Grant E. Donnelly & Cait Lamberton & Rebecca Walker Reczek & Michael I. Norton, 2017. "Social Recycling Transforms Unwanted Goods into Happiness," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 2(1), pages 48-63.
    12. Grisaffe, Douglas B. & Nguyen, Hieu P., 2011. "Antecedents of emotional attachment to brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(10), pages 1052-1059, October.
    13. Belk, Russell W, 1988. "Possessions and the Extended Self," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 15(2), pages 139-168, September.
    14. Remi Trudel & Jennifer J. Argo & Matthew D. Meng, 2016. "The Recycled Self: Consumers’ Disposal Decisions of Identity-Linked Products," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 43(2), pages 246-264.
    15. Belk, Russell, 2014. "You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(8), pages 1595-1600.
    16. Thürridl, Carina & Kamleitner, Bernadette & Ruzeviciute, Ruta & Süssenbach, Sophie & Dickert, Stephan, 2020. "From happy consumption to possessive bonds: When positive affect increases psychological ownership for brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 89-103.
    17. Price, Linda L & Arnould, Eric J & Curasi, Carolyn Folkman, 2000. "Older Consumers' Disposition of Special Possessions," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 27(2), pages 179-201, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cerio, Eva & Debenedetti, Alain, 2021. "“Should I give it away or sell it?” A strategic perspective on consumers’ redistribution of their unused objects," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 581-591.
    2. Guillard, Valérie, 2009. "La tendance de certains consommateurs à tout garder," Economics Thesis from University Paris Dauphine, Paris Dauphine University, number 123456789/5480 edited by Pinson, Christian.
    3. Masset, Julie & Decrop, Alain, 2016. "“God, I have so many ashtrays!” Dependences and dependencies in consumer–possession relationships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 94-109.
    4. Donald R. Lehmann & Jeffrey R. Parker, 2017. "Disadoption," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 7(1), pages 36-51, June.
    5. Syrjälä, Henna, 2016. "Turning point of transformation: Consumer communities, identity projects and becoming a serious dog hobbyist," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 177-190.
    6. Samuel Guillemot, 2018. "Intergenerational transmission in consumer behaviour: An integrative conceptual framework and future research directions," Post-Print hal-02466675, HAL.
    7. Catherine A. Roster & Joseph R. Ferrari, 2023. "Having less: A personal project taxonomy of consumers' decluttering orientations, motives and emotions," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(1), pages 264-295, January.
    8. Charis X. Li & Xiao-xiao Liu & Jun Ye & Siyu Zheng & Songyin Cai, 2024. "Ethical Pursuit or Personal Nirvana? Unpacking the Practice of Danshari in China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 191(4), pages 675-695, May.
    9. Liu, Jingshi (Joyce) & Dalton, Amy Nicole, 2024. "The inauthentic consumer: Consequences of self-inauthenticity for possession disposal," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    10. Eva Cerio & Alain Debenedetti, 2019. "From dispossession to objects' reuse: trajectories and practices in the context of clothing," Post-Print hal-02135221, HAL.
    11. Karin Brondino-Pompeo, 2021. "Mapping spheres of exchange: a multidimensional approach to commoditization and singularization," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(1), pages 81-95, June.
    12. Pera, Rebecca & Viglia, Giampaolo & Furlan, Roberto, 2016. "Who Am I? How Compelling Self-storytelling Builds Digital Personal Reputation," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 44-55.
    13. Daniel Villanova, 2019. "The extended self, product valuation, and the endowment effect," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 9(3), pages 357-371, December.
    14. Tran, Thi Thanh Huong & Robinson, Kate & Paparoidamis, Nicholas G., 2022. "Sharing with perfect strangers: The effects of self-disclosure on consumers’ trust, risk perception, and behavioral intention in the sharing economy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 1-16.
    15. Mike Molesworth & Rebecca Watkins & Janice Denegri-Knott, 2016. "Possession Work on Hosted Digital Consumption Objects as Consumer Ensnarement," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(2), pages 246-261.
    16. Thomas M. Zellweger & Franz W. Kellermanns & James J. Chrisman & Jess H. Chua, 2012. "Family Control and Family Firm Valuation by Family CEOs: The Importance of Intentions for Transgenerational Control," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(3), pages 851-868, June.
    17. Adriana Manolica & Marius-Iulian Cluci & Teodora Roman, 2021. "The Consumer Explained through the Extended-Self," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 572-581, August.
    18. Atakan, S. Sinem & Bagozzi, Richard P. & Yoon, Carolyn, 2014. "Consumer participation in the design and realization stages of production: How self-production shapes consumer evaluations and relationships to products," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 395-408.
    19. Thomas, Veronica L. & Yeh, Marie & Jewell, Robert D., 2015. "Enhancing valuation: the impact of self-congruence with a brand on the endowment effect," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 178-185.
    20. Sirieix, Lucie & Séré de Lanauze, Gilles & Dyen, Margot & Balbo, Laurie & Suarez, Erick, 2023. "The role of communities in vegetarian and vegan identity construction," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:139:y:2022:i:c:p:1211-1217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.