IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v135y2021icp731-748.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maximizers and Satisficers: Can’t choose and Can’t reject

Author

Listed:
  • Khare, Adwait
  • Chowdhury, Tilottama G.
  • Morgan, Jeremy

Abstract

Decision-makers show a status-quo bias when they cannot relinquish status quo selections. Maximizers tend to be regretful and indecisive, while satisficers tend to be content. Does this mean that maximizers will show a larger status-quo bias than satisficers? Could the reverse occur? To answer these questions, we study the ways in which the moderating effect of the maximization trait on the choose-reject status-quo bias (choosing few options but also rejecting few) is itself moderated by three contextual factors: information load, counterfactuals, and mood. Our results show that, compared to each other, both maximizers and satisficers show a larger choose-reject status-quo bias under compatible contextual factors. Maximizers do so when information load is high (study 1), and satisficers do so when experiencing a downward counterfactual (study 2) and positive mood (study 3). We believe that compatible contextual moods amplify the influence of maximization trait moods and drive our effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Khare, Adwait & Chowdhury, Tilottama G. & Morgan, Jeremy, 2021. "Maximizers and Satisficers: Can’t choose and Can’t reject," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 731-748.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:135:y:2021:i:c:p:731-748
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.07.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296321004872
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.07.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:cup:judgdm:v:11:y:2016:i:2:p:126-146 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Campo, Katia & Gijsbrechts, Els & Nisol, Patricia, 2004. "Dynamics in consumer response to product unavailability: do stock-out reactions signal response to permanent assortment reductions?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(8), pages 834-843, August.
    3. Zeelenberg, Marcel & van Dijk, Wilco W. & Manstead, Antony S. R., 2000. "Regret and Responsibility Resolved? Evaluating Ordonez and Connolly's (2000) Conclusions," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 81(1), pages 143-154, January.
    4. repec:cup:judgdm:v:9:y:2014:i:3:p:287-296 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Huber, Vandra L. & Neale, Margaret A. & Northcraft, Gregory B., 1987. "Decision bias and personnel selection strategies," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 136-147, August.
    6. Nagpal, Anish & Lei, Jing & Khare, Adwait, 2015. "To Choose or to Reject: The Effect of Decision Frame on Food Customization Decisions," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 91(3), pages 422-435.
    7. repec:cup:judgdm:v:7:y:2012:i:1:p:48-60 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Samuelson, William & Zeckhauser, Richard, 1988. "Status Quo Bias in Decision Making," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 7-59, March.
    9. Suri, Rajneesh & Long, Mary & Monroe, Kent B., 2003. "The impact of the Internet and consumer motivation on evaluation of prices," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(5), pages 379-390, May.
    10. Wang, Kai-Yu & Liang, Minli & Peracchio, Laura A., 2011. "Strategies to offset dissatisfactory product performance: The role of post-purchase marketing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(8), pages 809-815, August.
    11. Beverland, Michael & Lim, Elison Ai Ching & Morrison, Michael & Terziovski, Mile, 2006. "In-store music and consumer-brand relationships: Relational transformation following experiences of (mis)fit," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(9), pages 982-989, September.
    12. repec:cup:judgdm:v:15:y:2020:i:5:p:798-806 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. repec:cup:judgdm:v:3:y:2008:i::p:371-388 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Tilottama Chowdhury & S. Ratneshwar & Praggyan Mohanty, 2009. "The time-harried shopper: Exploring the differences between maximizers and satisficers," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 155-167, June.
    15. Jingjing Ma & Neal J. Roese, 2014. "The Maximizing Mind-Set," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 41(1), pages 71-92.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:cup:judgdm:v:11:y:2016:i:2:p:126-146 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Kuhberger, Anton, 1998. "The Influence of Framing on Risky Decisions: A Meta-analysis," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 23-55, July.
    3. Ana Alina Tudoran, 2022. "A machine learning approach to identifying decision-making styles for managing customer relationships," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(1), pages 351-374, March.
    4. Muthaffar, Aisha & Vilches-Montero, Sonia, 2023. "Empowering retailers: A bounded rationality perspective to enhancing omnichannel journey satisfaction," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    5. repec:cup:judgdm:v:12:y:2017:i:5:p:516-526 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Misuraca, Raffaella & Fasolo, Barbara, 2018. "Maximizing versus satisficing in the digital age: disjoint scales and the case for “construct consensus”," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 84324, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Tian Qiu & Yang Bai & Jingyi Lu, 2020. "Taking risks for the best: Maximizing and risk-taking tendencies," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 15(4), pages 499-508, July.
    8. Ma, Jingjing & Lin, Yu (Anna) & Ein-Gar, Danit, 2023. "Charitable maximizers: The impact of the maximizing mindset on donations to human recipients," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 417-434.
    9. Liu, Pengcheng & Xie, Qing & You, Yi & Dong, Qingqing, 2024. "A Study of Choice Overload Measurement in Food Consumption," IAAE 2024 Conference, August 2-7, 2024, New Delhi, India 344272, International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE).
    10. Yaniv, Ilan & Schul, Yaacov, 2000. "Acceptance and Elimination Procedures in Choice: Noncomplementarity and the Role of Implied Status quo," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 82(2), pages 293-313, July.
    11. Shani, Yaniv & Danziger, Shai & Zeelenberg, Marcel, 2015. "Choosing between options associated with past and future regret," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 107-114.
    12. Besharat, Ali & Romero, Marisabel & Haws, Kelly, 2021. "Customizing calories: How rejecting (vs. selecting) ingredients leads to lower calorie estimation and unhealthier food choices," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 97(3), pages 424-438.
    13. repec:cup:judgdm:v:15:y:2020:i:4:p:499-508 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Kaeun Kim & Elizabeth Miller, 2017. "Vulnerable maximizers: The role of decision difficulty," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 12(5), pages 516-526, September.
    15. Xia, Lan & Bechwati, Nada Nasr, 2021. "Maximizing what? The effect of maximizing mindset on the evaluation of product bundles," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 314-325.
    16. Nathan N. Cheek & Barry Schwartz, 2016. "On the meaning and measurement of maximization," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 11(2), pages 126-146, March.
    17. Hyung Sup (Zack) Bhan & Eric T. Anderson, 2023. "Multiyear Impact of Backorder Delays: A Quasi-Experimental Approach," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(2), pages 314-335, March.
    18. Philippe Fevrier & Sebastien Gay, 2005. "Informed Consent Versus Presumed Consent The Role of the Family in Organ Donations," HEW 0509007, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Wiebke Roß & Jens Weghake, 2018. "Wa(h)re Liebe: Was Online-Dating-Plattformen über zweiseitige Märkte lehren," TUC Working Papers in Economics 0017, Abteilung für Volkswirtschaftslehre, Technische Universität Clausthal (Department of Economics, Technical University Clausthal).
    20. Jose Apesteguia & Miguel Ballester, 2009. "A theory of reference-dependent behavior," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 40(3), pages 427-455, September.
    21. Bryce, Cormac & Dowling, Michael & Lucey, Brian, 2020. "The journal quality perception gap," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(5).
    22. Boyce, Christopher & Czajkowski, Mikołaj & Hanley, Nick, 2019. "Personality and economic choices," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 82-100.
    23. Alexandra Rausch & Alexander Brauneis, 2015. "It’s about how the task is set: the inclusion–exclusion effect and accountability in preprocessing management information," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 23(2), pages 313-344, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:135:y:2021:i:c:p:731-748. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.