IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v103y2019icp607-619.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Investigation into critical challenges for multinational third-party logistics providers operating in China

Author

Listed:
  • Rahman, Shams
  • Ahsan, Kamrul
  • Yang, Laura
  • Odgers, John

Abstract

The entry of the multinational third-party logistics (MN3PL) service providers in China has a far-reaching impact on the development of the Chinese logistics industry. However, while delivering services, MN3PLs experience several challenges which are crucial to identify and address for further improvement of their service delivery. This study aims to identify and prioritise these challenges for strategic importance of MN3PLs operating in China. Through an extensive literature review of 3PL research fourteen challenges for MN3PLs are identified and a theoretical underpinning relative to these challenges is provided. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach is employed to assess the criticality of challenges. Five executives from five large MN3PLs are invited to participate in this study. Results indicate that the most critical challenges confronted by the MN3PLs are guanxi, government regulations, price pressure, and transportation cost. To remain competitive MN3PLs must build guanxi networks with key stakeholders and minimize cost of delivery.

Suggested Citation

  • Rahman, Shams & Ahsan, Kamrul & Yang, Laura & Odgers, John, 2019. "An Investigation into critical challenges for multinational third-party logistics providers operating in China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 607-619.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:103:y:2019:i:c:p:607-619
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.09.053
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296317303703
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.09.053?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ramasamy, Bala & Goh, K.W. & Yeung, Matthew C.H., 2006. "Is Guanxi (relationship) a bridge to knowledge transfer?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 130-139, January.
    2. Stefan Gold & Stefan Seuring & Philip Beske, 2010. "Sustainable supply chain management and inter‐organizational resources: a literature review," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(4), pages 230-245, July.
    3. Thomas L. Saaty, 1990. "An Exposition of the AHP in Reply to the Paper "Remarks on the Analytic Hierarchy Process"," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(3), pages 259-268, March.
    4. Zhaofang Chu, 2012. "Logistics and economic growth: a panel data approach," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 49(1), pages 87-102, August.
    5. Amrik S. Sohal & Shams Rahman, 2013. "Use of Third Party Logistics Services: An Asia-Pacific Perspective," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: James H. Bookbinder (ed.), Handbook of Global Logistics, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 45-67, Springer.
    6. Birger Wernerfelt, 1995. "The resource‐based view of the firm: Ten years after," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(3), pages 171-174.
    7. Shi, Yangyan & Zhang, Abraham & Arthanari, Tiru & Liu, Yanping & Cheng, T.C.E., 2016. "Third-party purchase: An empirical study of third-party logistics providers in China," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P2), pages 189-200.
    8. Korpela, Jukka & Tuominen, Markku, 1996. "A decision aid in warehouse site selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(1-3), pages 169-180, August.
    9. Hongxin Zhao & Chin-Chun Hsu, 2007. "Social ties and foreign market entry: An empirical inquiry," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 47(6), pages 815-844, December.
    10. Chung-Leung Luk & Oliver H M Yau & Leo Y M Sin & Alan C B Tse & Raymond P M Chow & Jenny S Y Lee, 2008. "The effects of social capital and organizational innovativeness in different institutional contexts," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 39(4), pages 589-612, June.
    11. Mahpula, Abduwali & Yang, DeGang & Kurban, Alishir & Witlox, Frank, 2013. "An overview of 20years of Chinese logistics research using a content-based analysis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 30-34.
    12. Shrestha, Ram K. & Alavalapati, Janaki R. R. & Kalmbacher, Robert S., 2004. "Exploring the potential for silvopasture adoption in south-central Florida: an application of SWOT-AHP method," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 81(3), pages 185-199, September.
    13. Lee, Peter K.C. & Humphreys, Paul K., 2007. "The role of Guanxi in supply management practices," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(2), pages 450-467, April.
    14. Abdulrahman, Muhammad D. & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Subramanian, Nachiappan, 2014. "Critical barriers in implementing reverse logistics in the Chinese manufacturing sectors," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PB), pages 460-471.
    15. Shou, Zhigang & Chen, Jun & Zhu, Wenting & Yang, Lihua, 2014. "Firm capability and performance in China: The moderating role of guanxi and institutional forces in domestic and foreign contexts," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 77-82.
    16. Yen, Dorothy Ai-wan & Abosag, Ibrahim, 2016. "Localization in China: How guanxi moderates Sino–US business relationships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 5724-5734.
    17. Chan, Tysun & Gountas, Sandra & Zhang, Luyuan & Handley, Brian, 2016. "Western firms' successful and unsuccessful business models in China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 4150-4160.
    18. Paul J. H. Schoemaker & C. Carter Waid, 1982. "An Experimental Comparison of Different Approaches to Determining Weights in Additive Utility Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 182-196, February.
    19. Barker, Theresa J. & Zabinsky, Zelda B., 2011. "A multicriteria decision making model for reverse logistics using analytical hierarchy process," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 558-573, October.
    20. Luo, Jun & Chong, Alain Yee-Loong & Ngai, Eric W.T. & Liu, Martin J., 2014. "Green Supply Chain Collaboration implementation in China: The mediating role of guanxi," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 98-110.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Han Yan & Min-Ju Song & Hee-Yong Lee, 2021. "A Systematic Review of Factors Affecting Food Loss and Waste and Sustainable Mitigation Strategies: A Logistics Service Providers’ Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Orji, Ifeyinwa Juliet & Kusi-Sarpong, Simonov & Huang, Shuangfa & Vazquez-Brust, Diego, 2020. "Evaluating the factors that influence blockchain adoption in the freight logistics industry," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lee, Liane W.Y. & Tang, Yiming & Yip, Leslie S.C. & Sharma, Piyush, 2018. "Managing customer relationships in the emerging markets – guanxi as a driver of Chinese customer loyalty," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 356-365.
    2. Chu, Zhaofang & Feng, Bo & Lai, Fujun, 2018. "Logistics service innovation by third party logistics providers in China: Aligning guanxi and organizational structure," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 291-307.
    3. Madjid Tavana & Mariya Sodenkamp & Leena Suhl, 2010. "A soft multi-criteria decision analysis model with application to the European Union enlargement," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 393-421, December.
    4. Raut, Rakesh D. & Gardas, Bhaskar B. & Narwane, Vaibhav S. & Narkhede, Balkrishna E., 2019. "Improvement in the food losses in fruits and vegetable supply chain - a perspective of cold third-party logistics approach," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 6(C).
    5. Yuan, Yang & Chu, Zhaofang & Lai, Fujun & Wu, Hao, 2020. "The impact of transaction attributes on logistics outsourcing success: A moderated mediation model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 54-65.
    6. Luo, Jun & Chong, Alain Yee-Loong & Ngai, Eric W.T. & Liu, Martin J., 2014. "Green Supply Chain Collaboration implementation in China: The mediating role of guanxi," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 98-110.
    7. Wu, Guo-Ciang & Ding, Jyh-Hong & Chen, Ping-Shun, 2012. "The effects of GSCM drivers and institutional pressures on GSCM practices in Taiwan’s textile and apparel industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 618-636.
    8. Martín-Rojas, Rodrigo & García-Morales, Victor J. & Garrido-Moreno, Aurora & Salmador-Sánchez, Maria Paz, 2021. "Social Media Use and the Challenge of Complexity: Evidence from the Technology Sector," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 621-640.
    9. Zanakis, Stelios H. & Solomon, Anthony & Wishart, Nicole & Dublish, Sandipa, 1998. "Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(3), pages 507-529, June.
    10. Gomez-Limon, J.A. & Atance, I., 2004. "Identification of public objectives related to agricultural sector support," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 26(8-9), pages 1045-1071, December.
    11. Patricia Guarnieri & Lucio Camara e Silva & Bárbara de Oliveira Vieira, 2020. "How to Assess Reverse Logistics of e-Waste Considering a Multicriteria Perspective? A Model Proposition," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-31, October.
    12. Pasi Heikkurinen & Sari Forsman‐Hugg, 2011. "Strategic Corporate Responsibility in the Food Chain," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(5), pages 306-316, September.
    13. Zunaira Khadim & Irem Batool & Ahsan Akbar & Petra Poulova & Minahs Akbar, 2021. "Mapping the Moderating Role of Logistics Performance of Logistics Infrastructure on Economic Growth in Developing Countries," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-12, November.
    14. Wu, Wen-Kuei & Wang Chiu, Singa, 2016. "The impact of guanxi positioning on the quality of manufacturer–retailer channel relationships: Evidence from Taiwanese SMEs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3398-3405.
    15. Wang, Liwen & Jin, Jason Lu & Zhou, Kevin Zheng, 2023. "Technological capability strength/asymmetry and supply chain process innovation: The contingent roles of institutional environments," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(4).
    16. Wang, Mengyang & Zheng Zhou, Kevin & Bai, Xuan & Li, Jiaxuan, 2024. "Trust asymmetry and changes in supplier opportunism: An institutional contingency view," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    17. Huo, Baofeng & Gu, Minhao & Jiang, Bin, 2018. "China-related POM research: Literature review and suggestions for future research," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 134-153.
    18. Liwen Wang & Jin Jason Lu & Kevin Zhou, 2023. "Technological Capability Strength/Asymmetry and Supply Chain Process Innovation: The Contingent Roles of Institutional Environments in China," Post-Print hal-03954124, HAL.
    19. Qi, Guanqiu & Shi, Wenming & Lin, Kun-Chin & Yuen, Kum Fai & Xiao, Yi, 2020. "Spatial spillover effects of logistics infrastructure on regional development: Evidence from China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 96-114.
    20. Zhu, Qinghua & Lai, Kee-hung, 2019. "Enhancing supply chain operations with extended corporate social responsibility practices by multinational enterprises: Social capital perspective from Chinese suppliers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 1-12.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:103:y:2019:i:c:p:607-619. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.