IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jaitra/v89y2020ics0969699720305172.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Handling the pseudo pilot assignment problem in air traffic control training by using NASA TLX

Author

Listed:
  • Dönmez, Kadir
  • Demirel, Soner
  • Özdemir, Mustafa

Abstract

Simulator courses play an important role in a department training air traffic controllers (ATCOs). One of the most important elements of these courses is a pseudo-pilot (PP) who has active tasks during simulator training. At Eskisehir Technical University (ESTU) PP assignments are made manually to meet the demand of related courses by considering the availability of PP. Even where it is attempted to assign each PP equally in terms of period, personal workloads differ due to the different psychological (mental) and physiological requirements of the simulator tasks. In this study, the PP assignment problem is investigated using mixed-integer programming (MIP). For this purpose, firstly, an equal period assignment to pilots was attempted with a mathematical model, called the Equality of Periods Model (EPM). Then, simulator tasks were weighted using the NASA Task Load Index (NASA TLX), and an Equality of Workload Model (EWLM) was created based on these weights. Finally, these models were combined to make fair assignments with the Fair Model (FM). The results indicate that the proposed models significantly reduce the differences of workload and working period compared to manual assignment (MA).

Suggested Citation

  • Dönmez, Kadir & Demirel, Soner & Özdemir, Mustafa, 2020. "Handling the pseudo pilot assignment problem in air traffic control training by using NASA TLX," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jaitra:v:89:y:2020:i:c:s0969699720305172
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2020.101934
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969699720305172
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2020.101934?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. De Causmaecker, Patrick & Demeester, Peter & Vanden Berghe, Greet, 2009. "A decomposed metaheuristic approach for a real-world university timetabling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 195(1), pages 307-318, May.
    2. Hultberg, Tim H. & Cardoso, Domingos M., 1997. "The teacher assignment problem: A special case of the fixed charge transportation problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 101(3), pages 463-473, September.
    3. Asratian, A. S. & de Werra, D., 2002. "A generalized class-teacher model for some timetabling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(3), pages 531-542, December.
    4. Domenech, B & Lusa, A, 2016. "A MILP model for the teacher assignment problem considering teachers’ preferences," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(3), pages 1153-1160.
    5. Saviniec, Landir & Santos, Maristela O. & Costa, Alysson M., 2018. "Parallel local search algorithms for high school timetabling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(1), pages 81-98.
    6. Vermuyten, Hendrik & Lemmens, Stef & Marques, Inês & Beliën, Jeroen, 2016. "Developing compact course timetables with optimized student flows," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(2), pages 651-661.
    7. Badri, Masood A., 1996. "A two-stage multiobjective scheduling model for [faculty-course-time] assignments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 16-28, October.
    8. Carrasco, M. P. & Pato, M. V., 2004. "A comparison of discrete and continuous neural network approaches to solve the class/teacher timetabling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(1), pages 65-79, February.
    9. Saviniec, Landir & Santos, Maristela O. & Costa, Alysson M. & Santos, Lana M.R. dos, 2020. "Pattern-based models and a cooperative parallel metaheuristic for high school timetabling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 280(3), pages 1064-1081.
    10. Ozdemir, Mujgan S. & Gasimov, Rafail N., 2004. "The analytic hierarchy process and multiobjective 0-1 faculty course assignment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(2), pages 398-408, September.
    11. Daskalaki, S. & Birbas, T. & Housos, E., 2004. "An integer programming formulation for a case study in university timetabling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(1), pages 117-135, February.
    12. Ioannis X. Tassopoulos & Christina A. Iliopoulou & Grigorios N. Beligiannis, 2020. "Solving the Greek school timetabling problem by a mixed integer programming model," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(1), pages 117-132, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. P. Solano Cutillas & D. Pérez-Perales & M. M. E. Alemany Díaz, 2022. "A mathematical programming tool for an efficient decision-making on teaching assignment under non-regular time schedules," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 2899-2942, July.
    2. Vermuyten, Hendrik & Lemmens, Stef & Marques, Inês & Beliën, Jeroen, 2016. "Developing compact course timetables with optimized student flows," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(2), pages 651-661.
    3. Salem Al-Yakoob & Hanif Sherali, 2015. "A column generation mathematical programming approach for a class-faculty assignment problem with preferences," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 297-318, April.
    4. Zhang, Defu & Liu, Yongkai & M'Hallah, Rym & Leung, Stephen C.H., 2010. "A simulated annealing with a new neighborhood structure based algorithm for high school timetabling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(3), pages 550-558, June.
    5. Sunil B. Bhoi & Jayesh M. Dhodiya, 2024. "Multi-objective faculty course assignment problem based on the double parametric form of fuzzy preferences," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 34(2), pages 1-16.
    6. Caselli, Giulia & Delorme, Maxence & Iori, Manuel, 2022. "Integer linear programming for the Tutor Allocation Problem : A practical case in a British University," Other publications TiSEM 983593a6-c17d-4b87-8ee1-a, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    7. De Causmaecker, Patrick & Demeester, Peter & Vanden Berghe, Greet, 2009. "A decomposed metaheuristic approach for a real-world university timetabling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 195(1), pages 307-318, May.
    8. Domenech, B & Lusa, A, 2016. "A MILP model for the teacher assignment problem considering teachers’ preferences," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(3), pages 1153-1160.
    9. Alejandro Cataldo & Juan-Carlos Ferrer & Jaime Miranda & Pablo A. Rey & Antoine Sauré, 2017. "An integer programming approach to curriculum-based examination timetabling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 258(2), pages 369-393, November.
    10. Geiger, Martin Josef & Wenger, Wolf, 2010. "On the assignment of students to topics: A Variable Neighborhood Search approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 25-34, March.
    11. Jaime Miranda, 2010. "eClasSkeduler: A Course Scheduling System for the Executive Education Unit at the Universidad de Chile," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 40(3), pages 196-207, June.
    12. Johnes, Jill, 2015. "Operational Research in education," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(3), pages 683-696.
    13. Al-Yakoob, Salem M. & Sherali, Hanif D., 2007. "A mixed-integer programming approach to a class timetabling problem: A case study with gender policies and traffic considerations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 180(3), pages 1028-1044, August.
    14. Fabian Dunke & Stefan Nickel, 2023. "A matheuristic for customized multi-level multi-criteria university timetabling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 328(2), pages 1313-1348, September.
    15. Pongcharoen, P. & Promtet, W. & Yenradee, P. & Hicks, C., 2008. "Stochastic Optimisation Timetabling Tool for university course scheduling," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(2), pages 903-918, April.
    16. Cristian D. Palma & Patrick Bornhardt, 2020. "Considering Section Balance in an Integer Optimization Model for the Curriculum-Based Course Timetabling Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-12, October.
    17. Gartner, Daniel & Kolisch, Rainer, 2021. "Mathematical programming for nominating exchange students for international universities: The impact of stakeholders’ objectives and fairness constraints on allocations," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    18. Esmaeilbeigi, Rasul & Mak-Hau, Vicky & Yearwood, John & Nguyen, Vivian, 2022. "The multiphase course timetabling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(3), pages 1098-1119.
    19. Nergiz Kasimbeyli, 2015. "Existence and characterization theorems in nonconvex vector optimization," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 62(1), pages 155-165, May.
    20. Andrea Bettinelli & Valentina Cacchiani & Roberto Roberti & Paolo Toth, 2015. "An overview of curriculum-based course timetabling," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 23(2), pages 313-349, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jaitra:v:89:y:2020:i:c:s0969699720305172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-air-transport-management/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.