IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/intell/v86y2021ics0160289621000143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using DNA to predict intelligence

Author

Listed:
  • von Stumm, Sophie
  • Plomin, Robert

Abstract

The DNA revolution made it possible to use DNA to predict intelligence. We argue that this advance will transform intelligence research and society. Our paper has three objectives. First, we review how the DNA revolution has transformed the ability to predict individual differences in intelligence. Thousands of DNA variants have been identified that – aggregated into genome-wide polygenic scores (GPS) – account for more than 10% of the variance in phenotypic intelligence. The intelligence GPS is now one of the most powerful predictors in the behavioral sciences. Second, we consider the impact of GPS on intelligence research. The intelligence GPS can be added as a genetic predictor of intelligence to any study without the need to assess phenotypic intelligence. This feature will help export intelligence to many new areas of science. Also , the intelligence GPS will help to address complex questions in intelligence research, in particular how the gene-environment interplay affects the development of individual differences in intelligence. Third, we consider the societal impact of the intelligence GPS, focusing on DNA testing at birth, DNA testing before birth (e.g., embryo selection), and DNA testing before conception (e.g., DNA dating). The intelligence GPS represents a major scientific advance, and, like all scientific advances, it can be used for bad as well as good. We stress the need to maximize the considerable benefits and minimize the risks of our new ability to use DNA to predict intelligence.

Suggested Citation

  • von Stumm, Sophie & Plomin, Robert, 2021. "Using DNA to predict intelligence," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:intell:v:86:y:2021:i:c:s0160289621000143
    DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2021.101530
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289621000143
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.intell.2021.101530?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Javier de la Fuente & Gail Davies & Andrew D. Grotzinger & Elliot M. Tucker-Drob & Ian J. Deary, 2021. "A general dimension of genetic sharing across diverse cognitive traits inferred from molecular data," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 5(1), pages 49-58, January.
    2. Carl Shulman & Nick Bostrom, 2014. "Embryo Selection for Cognitive Enhancement: Curiosity or Game-changer?," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 5(1), pages 85-92, February.
    3. Kaili Rimfeld & Eva Krapohl & Maciej Trzaskowski & Jonathan R. I. Coleman & Saskia Selzam & Philip S. Dale & Tonu Esko & Andres Metspalu & Robert Plomin, 2018. "Genetic influence on social outcomes during and after the Soviet era in Estonia," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 2(4), pages 269-275, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Haier, Richard J., 2021. "Are we thinking big enough about the road ahead? Overview of the special issue on the future of intelligence research," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    2. Demetriou, Andreas & Mougi, Antigoni & Spanoudis, George & Makris, Nicolaos, 2022. "Changing developmental priorities between executive functions, working memory, and reasoning in the formation of g from 6 to 12 years," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paul Minard, 2022. "Molecular genetics and mid-career economic mobility," Papers 2209.00057, arXiv.org.
    2. Knyspel, Jacob & Plomin, Robert, 2024. "Comparing factor and network models of cognitive abilities using twin data," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    3. Nicola Barban & Elisabetta De Cao & Marco Francesconi, 2021. "Gene-Environment Effects on Female Fertility," CESifo Working Paper Series 9337, CESifo.
    4. Andrew D. Grotzinger & Travis T. Mallard & Zhaowen Liu & Jakob Seidlitz & Tian Ge & Jordan W. Smoller, 2023. "Multivariate genomic architecture of cortical thickness and surface area at multiple levels of analysis," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    5. Andrew D. Grotzinger & Javier de la Fuente & Gail Davies & Michel G. Nivard & Elliot M. Tucker-Drob, 2022. "Transcriptome-wide and stratified genomic structural equation modeling identify neurobiological pathways shared across diverse cognitive traits," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    6. Mengge Liu & Lu Wang & Yujie Zhang & Haoyang Dong & Caihong Wang & Yayuan Chen & Qian Qian & Nannan Zhang & Shaoying Wang & Guoshu Zhao & Zhihui Zhang & Minghuan Lei & Sijia Wang & Qiyu Zhao & Feng Li, 2024. "Investigating the shared genetic architecture between depression and subcortical volumes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    7. Alon, Ido & Guimón, José & Urbanos-Garrido, Rosa, 2019. "What to expect from assisted reproductive technologies? Experts' forecasts for the next two decades," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    8. Jonathan Beauchamp & Lauren Schmitz & Matthew McGue & James Lee, 2023. "Nature-Nurture Interplay: Evidence from Molecular Genetic and Pedigree Data in Korean American Adoptees," Working Papers 2023-030, Human Capital and Economic Opportunity Working Group.
    9. Pietro Biroli & Titus Galama & Stephanie von Hinke & Hans van Kippersluis & Kevin Thom, 2022. "Economics and Econometrics of Gene-Environment Interplay," Bristol Economics Discussion Papers 22/759, School of Economics, University of Bristol, UK.
    10. Bingxin Zhao & Yujue Li & Zirui Fan & Zhenyi Wu & Juan Shu & Xiaochen Yang & Yilin Yang & Xifeng Wang & Bingxuan Li & Xiyao Wang & Carlos Copana & Yue Yang & Jinjie Lin & Yun Li & Jason L. Stein & Joa, 2024. "Eye-brain connections revealed by multimodal retinal and brain imaging genetics," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    11. Lasker, Jordan, 2022. "Are Piagetian scales just intelligence tests?," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    12. Pereira, Rita & Biroli, Pietro & von hinke, stephanie & Van Kippersluis, Hans & Galama, Titus & Rietveld, Niels & Thom, Kevin, 2022. "Gene-Environment Interplay in the Social Sciences," OSF Preprints d96z3, Center for Open Science.
    13. Pesta, Bryan J. & Kirkegaard, Emil O.W. & te Nijenhuis, Jan & Lasker, Jordan & Fuerst, John G.R., 2020. "Racial and ethnic group differences in the heritability of intelligence: A systematic review and meta-analysis," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    14. Mara Almeida & Robert Ranisch, 2022. "Beyond safety: mapping the ethical debate on heritable genome editing interventions," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, December.
    15. Mingyang Li & Xixi Dang & Yiwei Chen & Zhifan Chen & Xinyi Xu & Zhiyong Zhao & Dan Wu, 2024. "Cognitive processing speed and accuracy are intrinsically different in genetic architecture and brain phenotypes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:intell:v:86:y:2021:i:c:s0160289621000143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/intelligence .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.