IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/intell/v81y2020ics0160289620300490.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing the association of growth mindset and grades across a challenging transition: Is growth mindset associated with grades?

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Yue
  • Bates, Timothy C.

Abstract

Mindset theory predicts that whether students believe basic ability is greatly malleable exerts a major influence on their own educational attainment (Blackwell, Trzesniewski, & Dweck, 2007). We tested this prediction in two near-replication studies (total n = 832). In study 1 we tested the association of mindset with university grades in a cross-sectional design involving self-reported grades for 246 undergraduates. Growth mindset showed no association with grades (β = −0.02 CI95 [−0.16, 0.12], t = −0.26, p = .792). In study 2, we implemented a longitudinal design, testing the association of mindset with grade transcript scores across a series of challenging transitions: from high school to university entry, and then across all years of an undergraduate degree (n = 586). Contrary to prediction, mindset was not associated with grades across the challenging transition from high-school to the first year of university (β = −0.05 CI95 [−0.14, 0.05], t = −0.95, p = .345). In addition, mindset was unrelated to entry grades (p = .808). And no support was found for a predicted interaction of mindset with academic disadvantage across the transition (β = −0.03 CI95 [−0.12, 0.07], t = −0.54, p = .592). Follow-up analyses showed no association of mindset with improvement in grades at any subsequent year of the degree (minimum p-value 0.591). Jointly, these two near-replication studies suggest that, even across challenging transitions, growth mindset is either unrelated to educational attainment or has a very small negative influence.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Yue & Bates, Timothy C., 2020. "Testing the association of growth mindset and grades across a challenging transition: Is growth mindset associated with grades?," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:intell:v:81:y:2020:i:c:s0160289620300490
    DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2020.101471
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289620300490
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.intell.2020.101471?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Macnamara, Brooke N. & Rupani, Natasha S., 2017. "The relationship between intelligence and mindset," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 52-59.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Haiyan Li & Salih Zeki Ozdemir & Peter A. Heslin, 2023. "Merely Folklore? The Role of a Growth Mindset in the Taking and Timing of Entrepreneurial Actions," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(6), pages 2077-2120, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hermundur Sigmundsson & Monika Haga & Magdalena Elnes & Benjamin Holen Dybendal & Fanny Hermundsdottir, 2022. "Motivational Factors Are Varying across Age Groups and Gender," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-13, April.
    2. Southwick, Daniel A. & Liu, Zhaoying V. & Baldwin, Chayce & Quirk, Abigail L. & Ungar, Lyle H. & Tsay, Chia-Jung & Duckworth, Angela L., 2023. "The trouble with talent: Semantic ambiguity in the workplace," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:intell:v:81:y:2020:i:c:s0160289620300490. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/intelligence .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.