IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/intell/v75y2019icp23-32.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Individual differences in cognitive processes underlying Trail Making Test-B performance in old age: The Lothian Birth Cohort 1936

Author

Listed:
  • MacPherson, Sarah E.
  • Allerhand, Michael
  • Cox, Simon R.
  • Deary, Ian J.

Abstract

The Trail Making Test Part B (TMT-B) is commonly used as a brief and simple neuropsychological assessment of executive dysfunction. The TMT-B is thought to rely on a number of distinct cognitive processes that predict individual differences in performance. The current study examined the unique and shared contributions of latent component variables in a large cohort of older people. Five hundred and eighty-seven healthy, community-dwelling older adults who were all born in 1936 were assessed on the TMT-B and multiple tasks tapping cognitive domains of visuospatial ability, processing speed, memory and reading ability. Firstly, a first-order measurement model examining independent contributions of the four cognitive domains was fitted; a significant relationship between TMT-B completion times and processing speed was found (β = −0.610, p < .001). Secondly, a bifactor model examined the unique influence of each cognitive ability when controlling for a general cognitive factor. Importantly, both a general cognitive factor (g; β = −0.561, p < .001) and additional g-independent variance from processing speed (β = −0.464, p < .001) contributed to successful TMT-B performance. These findings suggest that older adults' TMT-B performance is influenced by both general intelligence and processing speed, which may help understand poor performance on such tasks in clinical populations.

Suggested Citation

  • MacPherson, Sarah E. & Allerhand, Michael & Cox, Simon R. & Deary, Ian J., 2019. "Individual differences in cognitive processes underlying Trail Making Test-B performance in old age: The Lothian Birth Cohort 1936," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 23-32.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:intell:v:75:y:2019:i:c:p:23-32
    DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2019.04.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289618302113
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.intell.2019.04.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yiu-Fai Yung & David Thissen & Lori McLeod, 1999. "On the relationship between the higher-order factor model and the hierarchical factor model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 64(2), pages 113-128, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cox, S.R. & Ritchie, S.J. & Fawns-Ritchie, C. & Tucker-Drob, E.M. & Deary, I.J., 2019. "Structural brain imaging correlates of general intelligence in UK Biobank," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1-1.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shelley H. Liu & Yitong Chen & Jordan R. Kuiper & Emily Ho & Jessie P. Buckley & Leah Feuerstahler, 2024. "Applying Latent Variable Models to Estimate Cumulative Exposure Burden to Chemical Mixtures and Identify Latent Exposure Subgroups: A Critical Review and Future Directions," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 16(2), pages 482-502, July.
    2. Carlo Cavicchia & Maurizio Vichi & Giorgia Zaccaria, 2020. "The ultrametric correlation matrix for modelling hierarchical latent concepts," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 14(4), pages 837-853, December.
    3. Li Cai, 2010. "A Two-Tier Full-Information Item Factor Analysis Model with Applications," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 75(4), pages 581-612, December.
    4. Kano, Yutaka & Takai, Keiji, 2011. "Analysis of NMAR missing data without specifying missing-data mechanisms in a linear latent variate model," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 102(9), pages 1241-1255, October.
    5. Fu, Zhihui & Zhang, Xue & Tao, Jian, 2020. "Gibbs sampling using the data augmentation scheme for higher-order item response models," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 541(C).
    6. Satomi Doi & Masaya Ito & Yoshitake Takebayashi & Kumiko Muramatsu & Masaru Horikoshi, 2018. "Factorial validity and invariance of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 among clinical and non-clinical populations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(7), pages 1-9, July.
    7. Leigh McAlister & Garrett Sonnier & Tom Shively, 2012. "The relationship between online chatter and firm value," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 1-12, March.
    8. Abhijit Guha & Timna Bressgott & Dhruv Grewal & Dominik Mahr & Martin Wetzels & Elisa Schweiger, 2023. "How artificiality and intelligence affect voice assistant evaluations," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 843-866, July.
    9. Li Cai, 2015. "Lord–Wingersky Algorithm Version 2.0 for Hierarchical Item Factor Models with Applications in Test Scoring, Scale Alignment, and Model Fit Testing," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(2), pages 535-559, June.
    10. Minjeong Jeon & Frank Rijmen & Sophia Rabe-Hesketh, 2018. "CFA Models with a General Factor and Multiple Sets of Secondary Factors," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 83(4), pages 785-808, December.
    11. Wai, Jonathan & Lakin, Joni M. & Kell, Harrison J., 2022. "Specific cognitive aptitudes and gifted samples," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    12. Sonnier, Garrett P. & Rutz, Oliver J. & Ward, Adrian F., 2023. "Estimating the effect of brand beliefs on brand evaluations when beliefs are measured with error," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 552-569.
    13. repec:jss:jstsof:34:i03 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Frank Rijmen & Minjeong Jeon & Matthias von Davier & Sophia Rabe-Hesketh, 2014. "A Third-Order Item Response Theory Model for Modeling the Effects of Domains and Subdomains in Large-Scale Educational Assessment Surveys," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 39(4), pages 235-256, August.
    15. Carlo Cavicchia & Maurizio Vichi, 2022. "Second-Order Disjoint Factor Analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(1), pages 289-309, March.
    16. Robert Jennrich & Peter Bentler, 2011. "Exploratory Bi-Factor Analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 76(4), pages 537-549, October.
    17. Sayed H. Kadhem & Aristidis K. Nikoloulopoulos, 2023. "Bi-factor and Second-Order Copula Models for Item Response Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(1), pages 132-157, March.
    18. Carlo Cavicchia & Maurizio Vichi & Giorgia Zaccaria, 2023. "Hierarchical disjoint principal component analysis," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 107(3), pages 537-574, September.
    19. Niels G. Waller, 2018. "Direct Schmid–Leiman Transformations and Rank-Deficient Loadings Matrices," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 83(4), pages 858-870, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Trail Making Test; Ageing; g; Speed;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:intell:v:75:y:2019:i:c:p:23-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/intelligence .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.