IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/insuma/v55y2014icp91-95.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On inequalities for moments and the covariance of monotone functions

Author

Listed:
  • Schmidt, Klaus D.

Abstract

Intuition based on the usual interpretation of the covariance of two random variables suggests that the inequality cov[f(X),g(X)]≥0 should hold for any random variable X and any two increasing functions f and g. The inequality holds indeed, but a proof is hard to find in the literature. In this paper we provide an elementary proof of a more general inequality for moments and we present several applications in actuarial mathematics.

Suggested Citation

  • Schmidt, Klaus D., 2014. "On inequalities for moments and the covariance of monotone functions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 91-95.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:55:y:2014:i:c:p:91-95
    DOI: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2013.12.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167668714000055
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2013.12.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dhaene, J. & Denuit, M. & Goovaerts, M. J. & Kaas, R. & Vyncke, D., 2002. "The concept of comonotonicity in actuarial science and finance: theory," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 3-33, August.
    2. Wang, Shaun & Dhaene, Jan, 1998. "Comonotonicity, correlation order and premium principles," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 235-242, July.
    3. Milgrom, Paul R & Weber, Robert J, 1982. "A Theory of Auctions and Competitive Bidding," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 50(5), pages 1089-1122, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Narita, Daiju & Requate, Till, 2021. "Price vs. quantity regulation of volatile energy supply and market entry of RES-E operators," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    2. Wang, Dazhong & Xu, Xinyi & Zeng, Xianjie, 2023. "Comparisons of standard royalty auctions with seller post-auction effort," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    3. A. Shapoval & V. M. Goncharenko, 2020. "Industry equilibrium and welfare in monopolistic competition under uncertainty," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 130(2), pages 187-218, July.
    4. Schneider, Paul, 2019. "An anatomy of the market return," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(2), pages 325-350.
    5. Wang, Chenlan & Doan, Xuan Vinh & Chen, Bo, 2014. "Price of anarchy for non-atomic congestion games with stochastic demands," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 90-111.
    6. Jiaying Gu & Roger Koenker, 2020. "Invidious Comparisons: Ranking and Selection as Compound Decisions," Papers 2012.12550, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2021.
    7. Yamashita, Takuro, 2018. "Optimal Public Information Disclosure by Mechanism Designer," TSE Working Papers 18-936, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kaas, Rob & Laeven, Roger J.A. & Nelsen, Roger B., 2009. "Worst VaR scenarios with given marginals and measures of association," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 146-158, April.
    2. Choo, Weihao & de Jong, Piet, 2016. "Insights to systematic risk and diversification across a joint probability distribution," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 142-150.
    3. Maria Mercè Claramunt & Maite Màrmol, 2020. "Refundable deductible insurance," Working Papers hal-02909299, HAL.
    4. Elyès Jouini & Clotilde Napp, 2004. "Conditional comonotonicity," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 27(2), pages 153-166, December.
    5. Jouini, Elyes & Napp, Clotilde, 2003. "Comonotonic processes," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 255-265, April.
    6. Radu Tunaru, 2015. "Model Risk in Financial Markets:From Financial Engineering to Risk Management," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number 9524, October.
    7. Chuancun Yin & Dan Zhu, 2016. "Sharp convex bounds on the aggregate sums--An alternative proof," Papers 1603.05373, arXiv.org, revised May 2016.
    8. Cheung, Ka Chun, 2006. "Optimal portfolio problem with unknown dependency structure," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 167-175, February.
    9. Chuancun Yin & Dan Zhu, 2016. "Sharp Convex Bounds on the Aggregate Sums–An Alternative Proof," Risks, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-8, September.
    10. Andreas Tsanakas & Evangelia Desli, 2005. "Measurement and Pricing of Risk in Insurance Markets," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(6), pages 1653-1668, December.
    11. Cheung, Ka Chun & Yang, Hailiang, 2004. "Ordering optimal proportions in the asset allocation problem with dependent default risks," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 595-609, December.
    12. Cheung, Ka Chun, 2010. "Comonotonic convex upper bound and majorization," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 154-158, October.
    13. Heilpern, S., 2003. "A rank-dependent generalization of zero utility principle," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 67-73, August.
    14. KOCH, Inge & DE SCHEPPER, Ann, 2006. "The comonotonicity coefficient: A new measure of positive dependence in a multivariate setting," Working Papers 2006030, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    15. Wu, Xianyi & Zhou, Xian, 2006. "A new characterization of distortion premiums via countable additivity for comonotonic risks," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 324-334, April.
    16. Embrechts Paul & Wang Ruodu, 2015. "Seven Proofs for the Subadditivity of Expected Shortfall," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 1-15, October.
    17. Hongpeng Guo & Zhihao Lv & Junyi Hua & Hongxu Yuan & Qingyu Yu, 2021. "Design of Combined Auction Model for Emission Rights of International Forestry Carbon Sequestration and Other Pollutants Based on SMRA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-18, October.
    18. Yusuke Matsuki, 2016. "A Distribution-Free Test of Monotonicity with an Application to Auctions," Working Papers e110, Tokyo Center for Economic Research.
    19. Vinci Chow, 2019. "Predicting Auction Price of Vehicle License Plate with Deep Residual Learning," Papers 1910.04879, arXiv.org.
    20. Yeon-Koo Che & Ian Gale, 1994. "Auctions with budget-constrained buyers: a nonequivalence result," Working Papers (Old Series) 9402, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:55:y:2014:i:c:p:91-95. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505554 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.