IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/insuma/v116y2024icp202-217.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A mean field game approach to optimal investment and risk control for competitive insurers

Author

Listed:
  • Bo, Lijun
  • Wang, Shihua
  • Zhou, Chao

Abstract

We consider an insurance market consisting of multiple competitive insurers with a mean field interaction via their terminal wealth under the exponential utility with relative performance. It is assumed that each insurer regulates her risk by controlling the number of policies. We respectively establish the constant Nash equilibrium (independent of time) on the investment and risk control strategy for the finite n-insurer game and the constant mean field equilibrium for the corresponding mean field game (MFG) problem (when the number of insurers tends to infinity). Furthermore, we examine the convergence relationship between the constant Nash equilibrium of finite n-insurer game and the mean field equilibrium of the corresponding MFG problem. Our numerical analysis reveals that, for a highly competitive insurance market consisting of many insurers, every insurer will invest more in risky assets and increase the total number of outstanding liabilities to maximize her exponential utility with relative performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Bo, Lijun & Wang, Shihua & Zhou, Chao, 2024. "A mean field game approach to optimal investment and risk control for competitive insurers," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 202-217.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:116:y:2024:i:c:p:202-217
    DOI: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2024.03.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167668724000374
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2024.03.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Han, Jinhui & Ma, Guiyuan & Yam, Sheung Chi Phillip, 2022. "Relative performance evaluation for dynamic contracts in a large competitive market," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(2), pages 768-780.
    2. Guanxing Fu & Chao Zhou, 2021. "Mean Field Portfolio Games," Papers 2106.06185, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2022.
    3. Guanxing Fu, 2022. "Mean Field Portfolio Games with Consumption," Papers 2206.05425, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2022.
    4. A. Bensoussan & K. Sung & S. Yam, 2013. "Linear–Quadratic Time-Inconsistent Mean Field Games," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 3(4), pages 537-552, December.
    5. Jana Bielagk & Arnaud Lionnet & Goncalo Dos Reis, 2015. "Equilibrium pricing under relative performance concerns," Papers 1511.04218, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2017.
    6. Peng, Xingchun & Wang, Wenyuan, 2016. "Optimal investment and risk control for an insurer under inside information," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 104-116.
    7. Suleyman Basak & Dmitry Makarov, 2014. "Strategic Asset Allocation in Money Management," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 69(1), pages 179-217, February.
    8. Sid Browne, 1995. "Optimal Investment Policies for a Firm With a Random Risk Process: Exponential Utility and Minimizing the Probability of Ruin," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 937-958, November.
    9. Yang Shen & Bin Zou, 2021. "Mean-Variance Investment and Risk Control Strategies -- A Time-Consistent Approach via A Forward Auxiliary Process," Papers 2101.03954, arXiv.org.
    10. Hanspeter Schmidli, 2001. "Optimal Proportional Reinsurance Policies in a Dynamic Setting," Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2001(1), pages 55-68.
    11. Zou, Bin & Cadenillas, Abel, 2014. "Optimal investment and risk control policies for an insurer: Expected utility maximization," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 57-67.
    12. A. Bensoussan & K. C. J. Sung & S. C. P. Yam & S. P. Yung, 2016. "Linear-Quadratic Mean Field Games," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 169(2), pages 496-529, May.
    13. Hojgaard, Bjarne & Taksar, Michael, 1998. "Optimal proportional reinsurance policies for diffusion models with transaction costs," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 41-51, May.
    14. Gilles-Edouard Espinosa & Nizar Touzi, 2015. "Optimal Investment Under Relative Performance Concerns," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(2), pages 221-257, April.
    15. B. Højgaard & M. Taksar, 1998. "Optimal proportional reinsurance policies for diffusion models," Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1998(2), pages 166-180.
    16. Shen, Yang & Zou, Bin, 2021. "Mean–variance investment and risk control strategies — A time-consistent approach via a forward auxiliary process," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 68-80.
    17. Guohui Guan & Xiang Hu, 2022. "Time-Consistent Investment and Reinsurance Strategies for Mean–Variance Insurers in N-Agent and Mean-Field Games," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 537-569, November.
    18. Chen, Shumin & Yang, Hailiang & Zeng, Yan, 2018. "Stochastic Differential Games Between Two Insurers With Generalized Mean-Variance Premium Principle," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 48(1), pages 413-434, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang Shen & Bin Zou, 2021. "Mean-Variance Investment and Risk Control Strategies -- A Time-Consistent Approach via A Forward Auxiliary Process," Papers 2101.03954, arXiv.org.
    2. Zongxia Liang & Keyu Zhang, 2023. "Time-inconsistent mean field and n-agent games under relative performance criteria," Papers 2312.14437, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2024.
    3. Zhu, Huainian & Cao, Ming & Zhang, Chengke, 2019. "Time-consistent investment and reinsurance strategies for mean-variance insurers with relative performance concerns under the Heston model," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 280-291.
    4. Shen, Yang & Zou, Bin, 2021. "Mean–variance investment and risk control strategies — A time-consistent approach via a forward auxiliary process," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 68-80.
    5. Guanxing Fu, 2023. "Mean field portfolio games with consumption," Mathematics and Financial Economics, Springer, volume 17, number 4, February.
    6. Peng, Xingchun & Wang, Yushuang, 2024. "A non-zero-sum investment and reinsurance game between two mean–variance insurers with dynamic CVaR constraints," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    7. Michail Anthropelos & Tianran Geng & Thaleia Zariphopoulou, 2020. "Competition in Fund Management and Forward Relative Performance Criteria," Papers 2011.00838, arXiv.org.
    8. Masaaki Fujii & Masashi Sekine, 2023. "Mean-field Equilibrium Price Formation with Exponential Utility," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-1210, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
    9. Wang, Ning & Zhang, Nan & Jin, Zhuo & Qian, Linyi, 2021. "Stochastic differential investment and reinsurance games with nonlinear risk processes and VaR constraints," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 168-184.
    10. Han, Jinhui & Ma, Guiyuan & Yam, Sheung Chi Phillip, 2022. "Relative performance evaluation for dynamic contracts in a large competitive market," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(2), pages 768-780.
    11. Zhuo Jin & Zuo Quan Xu & Bin Zou, 2020. "A Perturbation Approach to Optimal Investment, Liability Ratio, and Dividend Strategies," Papers 2012.06703, arXiv.org, revised May 2021.
    12. Yan, Ming & Peng, Fanyi & Zhang, Shuhua, 2017. "A reinsurance and investment game between two insurance companies with the different opinions about some extra information," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 58-70.
    13. Masaaki Fujii & Masashi Sekine, 2023. "Mean-field equilibrium price formation with exponential utility," Papers 2304.07108, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2025.
    14. Deng, Chao & Zeng, Xudong & Zhu, Huiming, 2018. "Non-zero-sum stochastic differential reinsurance and investment games with default risk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(3), pages 1144-1158.
    15. Masaaki Fujii & Masashi Sekine, 2023. "Mean-field equilibrium price formation with exponential utility," CARF F-Series CARF-F-559, Center for Advanced Research in Finance, Faculty of Economics, The University of Tokyo.
    16. Bin Zou & Abel Cadenillas, 2017. "Optimal Investment and Liability Ratio Policies in a Multidimensional Regime Switching Model," Risks, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-22, January.
    17. Curatola, Giuliano, 2022. "Price impact, strategic interaction and portfolio choice," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    18. Wang, Ning & Zhang, Yumo, 2024. "Robust asset-liability management games for n players under multivariate stochastic covariance models," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 67-98.
    19. Fu, Guanxing & Horst, Ulrich, 2017. "Mean Field Games with Singular Controls," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 22, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    20. Li-Hsien Sun, 2022. "Mean Field Games with Heterogeneous Groups: Application to Banking Systems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 192(1), pages 130-167, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Competitive insurers; Investment and risk control; Mean field interaction; Nash equilibrium; Mean field game;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C73 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Stochastic and Dynamic Games; Evolutionary Games
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G22 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Insurance; Insurance Companies; Actuarial Studies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:116:y:2024:i:c:p:202-217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505554 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.