IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ijocip/v3y2010i2p76-82.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agent-based input–output interdependency model

Author

Listed:
  • Oliva, Gabriele
  • Panzieri, Stefano
  • Setola, Roberto

Abstract

The modeling and analysis of critical infrastructures and their interdependencies are essential to discovering hidden vulnerabilities and the related threats to national and international security. Over the past few years, several approaches have been proposed to address this problem. The so-called holistic approaches are relatively abstract, but are easily validated using real economic data. Other approaches based on agent-based models provide deeper views of the interdependencies existing between subsystems of different infrastructures. However, agent-based models are often difficult to validate because quantitative data of the appropriate granularity may not be available.

Suggested Citation

  • Oliva, Gabriele & Panzieri, Stefano & Setola, Roberto, 2010. "Agent-based input–output interdependency model," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 3(2), pages 76-82.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ijocip:v:3:y:2010:i:2:p:76-82
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcip.2010.05.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187454821000020X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijcip.2010.05.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Setola, Roberto & De Porcellinis, Stefano & Sforna, Marino, 2009. "Critical infrastructure dependency assessment using the input–output inoperability model," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 2(4), pages 170-178.
    2. Eliecer E. Vargas & Dean F. Schreiner & Gelson Tembo & David W. Marcouiller, 1999. "Computable General Equilibrium Modeling for Regional Analysis," Wholbk, Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University, number 18, November-.
    3. repec:rri:bkchap:18 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. S. De Porcellinis & R. Setola & S. Panzieri & G. Ulivi, 2008. "Simulation of heterogeneous and interdependent critical infrastructures," International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(1/2), pages 110-128.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mishra, Vishrut Kumar & Palleti, Venkata Reddy & Mathur, Aditya, 2019. "A modeling framework for critical infrastructure and its application in detecting cyber-attacks on a water distribution system," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 26(C).
    2. Wenping Xu & Zongjun Wang & Liu Hong & Ligang He & Xueguang Chen, 2015. "The uncertainty recovery analysis for interdependent infrastructure systems using the dynamic inoperability input–output model," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(7), pages 1299-1306, May.
    3. Wu, Baichao & Tang, Aiping & Wu, Jie, 2016. "Modeling cascading failures in interdependent infrastructures under terrorist attacks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 1-8.
    4. Niknejad, Ali & Petrovic, Dobrila, 2016. "A fuzzy dynamic Inoperability Input–output Model for strategic risk management in Global Production Networks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 44-58.
    5. Yasser Almoghathawi & Andrés D. González & Kash Barker, 2021. "Exploring Recovery Strategies for Optimal Interdependent Infrastructure Network Resilience," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 229-260, March.
    6. Pant, Raghav & Barker, Kash & Zobel, Christopher W., 2014. "Static and dynamic metrics of economic resilience for interdependent infrastructure and industry sectors," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 92-102.
    7. Trond G. Husby & Elco E. Koks, 2017. "Household migration in disaster impact analysis: incorporating behavioural responses to risk," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 87(1), pages 287-305, May.
    8. Wenzel, Lars & Wolf, André, 2013. "Protection against major catastrophes: An economic perspective," HWWI Research Papers 137, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWI).
    9. Labaka, Leire & Hernantes, Josune & Sarriegi, Jose M., 2016. "A holistic framework for building critical infrastructure resilience," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 21-33.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nan, Cen & Eusgeld, Irene & Kröger, Wolfgang, 2013. "Analyzing vulnerabilities between SCADA system and SUC due to interdependencies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 76-93.
    2. Baghersad, Milad & Zobel, Christopher W., 2015. "Economic impact of production bottlenecks caused by disasters impacting interdependent industry sectors," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 71-80.
    3. ERBIL Can, 2010. "Trade Taxes Are Better ?!? Short Answer: No," EcoMod2003 330700048, EcoMod.
    4. Patriquin, Mike N. & Wellstead, Adam M. & White, William A., 2007. "Beetles, trees, and people: Regional economic impact sensitivity and policy considerations related to the mountain pine beetle infestation in British Columbia, Canada," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(8), pages 938-946, May.
    5. Wang, Yanhui & Bi, Lifeng & Lin, Shuai & Li, Man & Shi, Hao, 2017. "A complex network-based importance measure for mechatronics systems," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 466(C), pages 180-198.
    6. Alana M. Weir & Thomas M. Wilson & Mark S. Bebbington & Sarah Beaven & Teresa Gordon & Craig Campbell-Smart & Stuart Mead & James H. Williams & Roger Fairclough, 2024. "Approaching the challenge of multi-phase, multi-hazard volcanic impact assessment through the lens of systemic risk: application to Taranaki Mounga," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(10), pages 9327-9360, August.
    7. Rehak, David & Senovsky, Pavel & Hromada, Martin & Lovecek, Tomas & Novotny, Petr, 2018. "Cascading Impact Assessment in a Critical Infrastructure System," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 125-138.
    8. Hassan Al-Zarooni & Hamdi Bashir, 2020. "An integrated ISM fuzzy MICMAC approach for modeling and analyzing electrical power system network interdependencies," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 11(6), pages 1204-1226, December.
    9. Cottafava, Dario & Gastaldo, Michele & Quatraro, Francesco & Santhiá, Cristina, 2022. "Modeling economic losses and greenhouse gas emissions reduction during the COVID-19 pandemic: Past, present, and future scenarios for Italy," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    10. Fang, Zhixiang & Shaw, Shih-Lung & Tu, Wei & Li, Qingquan & Li, Yuguang, 2012. "Spatiotemporal analysis of critical transportation links based on time geographic concepts: a case study of critical bridges in Wuhan, China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 44-59.
    11. Linn Svegrup & Jonas Johansson & Henrik Hassel, 2019. "Integration of Critical Infrastructure and Societal Consequence Models: Impact on Swedish Power System Mitigation Decisions," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(9), pages 1970-1996, September.
    12. Banerjee, Joydeep & Basu, Kaustav & Sen, Arunabha, 2018. "On hardening problems in critical infrastructure systems," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 49-67.
    13. Grant J. Allan, 2015. "The Regional Economic Impacts of Biofuels: A Review of Multisectoral Modelling Techniques and Evaluation of Applications," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(4), pages 615-643, April.
    14. Nan, Cen & Eusgeld, Irene, 2011. "Adopting HLA standard for interdependency study," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 149-159.
    15. Hossain, Niamat Ullah Ibne & Jaradat, Raed & Hosseini, Seyedmohsen & Marufuzzaman, Mohammad & Buchanan, Randy K., 2019. "A framework for modeling and assessing system resilience using a Bayesian network: A case study of an interdependent electrical infrastructure system," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 62-83.
    16. Adedamola Adepetu & Paul Grogan & Anas Alfaris & Davor Svetinovic & Olivier L. de Weck, 2014. "Functional and Spatial System Model for City Infrastructure Systems: A City.Net IES Case Study," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(1), pages 62-76, March.
    17. Michael Francis D. Benjamin & Aristotle T. Ubando & Luis F. Razon & Raymond R. Tan, 2015. "Analyzing the disruption resilience of bioenergy parks using dynamic inoperability input–output modeling," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 351-362, September.
    18. Praks, Pavel & Kopustinskas, Vytis & Masera, Marcelo, 2015. "Probabilistic modelling of security of supply in gas networks and evaluation of new infrastructure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 254-264.
    19. Oliva, Gabriele & Panzieri, Stefano & Setola, Roberto, 2011. "Fuzzy dynamic input–output inoperability model," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 4(3), pages 165-175.
    20. Wang, Shuliang & Hong, Liu & Chen, Xueguang, 2012. "Vulnerability analysis of interdependent infrastructure systems: A methodological framework," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 391(11), pages 3323-3335.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ijocip:v:3:y:2010:i:2:p:76-82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-critical-infrastructure-protection .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.