IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ijocip/v16y2017icp39-48.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A fuzzy model for evaluating metal detection equipment at airport security screening checkpoints

Author

Listed:
  • Skorupski, Jacek
  • Uchroński, Piotr

Abstract

Every passenger who travels by air is exposed to security screening. As part of this procedure, the passenger typically is screened by a walk-through metal detector. Such a device should effectively detect prohibited metal items while simultaneously ensuring adequate throughput at the security screening checkpoint. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate both these factors when selecting an appropriate walk-through metal detector and its parameters. However, while it is easy to measure passenger throughput, it is much more difficult to determine the effectiveness of a detector, which is a subjective concept.

Suggested Citation

  • Skorupski, Jacek & Uchroński, Piotr, 2017. "A fuzzy model for evaluating metal detection equipment at airport security screening checkpoints," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 16(C), pages 39-48.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ijocip:v:16:y:2017:i:c:p:39-48
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcip.2016.11.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1874548216301676
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijcip.2016.11.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gkritza, Konstantina & Niemeier, Debbie & Mannering, Fred, 2006. "Airport security screening and changing passenger satisfaction: An exploratory assessment," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 12(5), pages 213-219.
    2. Leone, Kelly & Liu, Rongfang (Rachel), 2011. "Improving airport security screening checkpoint operations in the US via paced system design," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 62-67.
    3. Gerstenfeld, Arthur & Berger, Paul D., 2011. "A decision-analysis approach for optimal airport security," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 14-21.
    4. Kirschenbaum, Alan (Avi), 2013. "The cost of airport security: The passenger dilemma," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 39-45.
    5. Hainen, Alexander M. & Remias, Stephen M. & Bullock, Darcy M. & Mannering, Fred L., 2013. "A hazard-based analysis of airport security transit times," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 32-38.
    6. Kirschenbaum, Alan (Avi) & Mariani, Michele & Van Gulijk, Coen & Rapaport, Carmit & Lubasz, Sharon, 2012. "Trusting technology: Security decision making at airports," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 57-60.
    7. Yoo, Kwang Eui & Choi, Youn Chul, 2006. "Analytic hierarchy process approach for identifying relative importance of factors to improve passenger security checks at airports," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 135-142.
    8. Greco, Salvatore & Matarazzo, Benedetto & Slowinski, Roman, 2001. "Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(1), pages 1-47, February.
    9. Wieneke, Monika & Koch, Wolfgang, 2009. "Combined person tracking and classification in a network of chemical sensors," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 51-67.
    10. Stewart, Mark G., 2010. "Risk-informed decision support for assessing the costs and benefits of counter-terrorism protective measures for infrastructure," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 3(1), pages 29-40.
    11. Oliva, Gabriele & Panzieri, Stefano & Setola, Roberto, 2011. "Fuzzy dynamic input–output inoperability model," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 4(3), pages 165-175.
    12. Stewart, Mark G. & Mueller, John, 2014. "Cost-benefit analysis of airport security: Are airports too safe?," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 19-28.
    13. Nie, Xiaofeng & Parab, Gautam & Batta, Rajan & Lin, Li, 2012. "Simulation-based Selectee Lane queueing design for passenger checkpoint screening," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(1), pages 146-155.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhonghua Wei & Sinan Chu & Zhengde Huang & Shi Qiu & Qixuan Zhao, 2020. "Optimization Design of X-ray Conveyer Belt Length for Subway Security Check Systems in Beijing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Huang, Chun-Nen & Liou, James J.H. & Lo, Huai-Wei & Chang, Fu-Jung, 2021. "Building an assessment model for measuring airport resilience," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    3. Skorupski, Jacek & Uchroński, Piotr, 2018. "Evaluation of the effectiveness of an airport passenger and baggage security screening system," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 53-64.
    4. Knol, Arthur & Sharpanskykh, Alexei & Janssen, Stef, 2019. "Analyzing airport security checkpoint performance using cognitive agent models," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 39-50.
    5. Adrian K. Siadkowski & Piotr Uchronski, 2021. "Impact of the Epidemic Threat on Changes in the Civil Aviation Security System due to SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 4), pages 849-864.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Skorupski, Jacek & Uchroński, Piotr, 2018. "Evaluation of the effectiveness of an airport passenger and baggage security screening system," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 53-64.
    2. Knol, Arthur & Sharpanskykh, Alexei & Janssen, Stef, 2019. "Analyzing airport security checkpoint performance using cognitive agent models," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 39-50.
    3. Zhonghua Wei & Sinan Chu & Zhengde Huang & Shi Qiu & Qixuan Zhao, 2020. "Optimization Design of X-ray Conveyer Belt Length for Subway Security Check Systems in Beijing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, March.
    4. Salter, Mark B., 2007. "SeMS and sensibility: Security management systems and the management of risk in the Canadian Air Transport Security Authority," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 13(6), pages 389-398.
    5. Sakano, R. & Obeng, K. & Fuller, K., 2016. "Airport security and screening satisfaction: A case study of U.S," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 129-138.
    6. Skorupski, Jacek & Uchroński, Piotr, 2020. "Multi-criteria group decision-making approach to the modernization of hold baggage security screening system at an airport," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    7. Aishvarya Kumar Jain & Jaap de Ruiter & Ivo Häring & Mirjam Fehling-Kaschek & Alexander Stolz, 2023. "Design, Simulation and Performance Evaluation of a Risk-Based Border Management System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-21, August.
    8. Kierzkowski, Artur & Kisiel, Tomasz, 2017. "Simulation model of security control system functioning: A case study of the Wroclaw Airport terminal," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 64(PB), pages 173-185.
    9. Yan, Xihong & Ren, Xiaorong & Nie, Xiaofeng, 2022. "A budget allocation model for domestic airport network protection," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PB).
    10. Hainen, Alexander M. & Remias, Stephen M. & Bullock, Darcy M. & Mannering, Fred L., 2013. "A hazard-based analysis of airport security transit times," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 32-38.
    11. Nunes-Vaz, Rick & Lord, Steven, 2014. "Designing physical security for complex infrastructures," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 178-192.
    12. Bezerra, George C.L. & Gomes, Carlos F., 2018. "Performance measurement practices in airports: Multidimensionality and utilization patterns," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 113-125.
    13. Wen-Min Lu & Qian Long Kweh & Chung-Wei Wang, 2021. "Integration and application of rough sets and data envelopment analysis for assessments of the investment trusts industry," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 296(1), pages 163-194, January.
    14. Pourakbar, M. & Zuidwijk, R.A., 2018. "The role of customs in securing containerized global supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(1), pages 331-340.
    15. Pang, Jifang & Liang, Jiye, 2012. "Evaluation of the results of multi-attribute group decision-making with linguistic information," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 294-301.
    16. Eduardo Fernández & José Rui Figueira & Jorge Navarro, 2023. "A theoretical look at ordinal classification methods based on comparing actions with limiting boundaries between adjacent classes," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(2), pages 819-843, June.
    17. Doumpos, M. & Marinakis, Y. & Marinaki, M. & Zopounidis, C., 2009. "An evolutionary approach to construction of outranking models for multicriteria classification: The case of the ELECTRE TRI method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(2), pages 496-505, December.
    18. Bouyssou, Denis & Marchant, Thierry, 2007. "An axiomatic approach to noncompensatory sorting methods in MCDM, II: More than two categories," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 178(1), pages 246-276, April.
    19. repec:dau:papers:123456789/4080 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Becchio, Cristina & Bottero, Marta Carla & Corgnati, Stefano Paolo & Dell’Anna, Federico, 2018. "Decision making for sustainable urban energy planning: an integrated evaluation framework of alternative solutions for a NZED (Net Zero-Energy District) in Turin," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 803-817.
    21. David Anderson, 2021. "Optimising multi-layered security screening," Journal of Transportation Security, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 249-273, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ijocip:v:16:y:2017:i:c:p:39-48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-critical-infrastructure-protection .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.