IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ijoais/v15y2014i4p400-422.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Issues with the communication and integrity of audit reports when financial reporting shifts to an information-centric paradigm

Author

Listed:
  • Cohen, Eric E.
  • Debreceny, Roger
  • Farewell, Stephanie
  • Roohani, Saeed

Abstract

A core application of XBRL is to facilitate the flow of tagged financial statements and annual reports, from companies and other entities directly to the databases, web sites, and computers of regulators, stakeholders and other information consumers. Increasingly, XBRL provides the technological foundation for the communication of financial information where there is independent assurance. This XBRL-based assurance may be on the financial statements (i.e., an electronically consumable form of today's standard PDF or HTML audit report) or focus on the quality of the XBRL exhibit (i.e., the instance document). Regardless of the type of XBRL assurance report, maintenance of the security and integrity of the instance document is paramount. This conceptual paper identifies and discusses the communication, security challenges and relevant research issues when there is independent assurance on financial statements formatted in XBRL. Successful electronic communication of assurance to information consumers should clearly distinguish the responsibilities of management (i.e., the financial statements) and the auditor (i.e., the audit report). It is important to have an integrated approach where the assurance report, financial statements and other reports in which facts in the financial statements are incorporated are inextricably tied at the level of automated data consumption. Further, as much as possible, human interaction should be accommodated. The paper sets out a range of alternatives for maintenance of security on the assurance report.

Suggested Citation

  • Cohen, Eric E. & Debreceny, Roger & Farewell, Stephanie & Roohani, Saeed, 2014. "Issues with the communication and integrity of audit reports when financial reporting shifts to an information-centric paradigm," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 400-422.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ijoais:v:15:y:2014:i:4:p:400-422
    DOI: 10.1016/j.accinf.2014.05.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1467089514000347
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.accinf.2014.05.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Srivastava, Rajendra P. & Kogan, Alexander, 2010. "Assurance on XBRL instance document: A conceptual framework of assertions," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 261-273.
    2. Roger Debreceny & Carsten Felden & Bartosz Ochocki & Maciej Piechocki & Michal Piechocki, 2009. "XBRL for Interactive Data," Springer Books, Springer, edition 1, number 978-3-642-01437-6, December.
    3. Roger Debreceny & Glen Gray, 1999. "Financial reporting on the Internet and the external audit," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 335-350.
    4. O'Riain, Seán & Curry, Edward & Harth, Andreas, 2012. "XBRL and open data for global financial ecosystems: A linked data approach," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 141-162.
    5. Efrim Boritz, J. & No, Won G., 2005. "Security in XML-based financial reporting services on the Internet," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 11-35.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kumar, Satish & Marrone, Mauricio & Liu, Qi & Pandey, Nitesh, 2020. "Twenty years of the International Journal of Accounting Information Systems: A bibliometric analysis," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    2. Steven F. Cahan & Seokjoo Chang & Wei Z. Siqueira & Kinsun Tam, 2022. "The roles of XBRL and processed XBRL in 10‐K readability," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1-2), pages 33-68, January.
    3. Indrit Troshani & Nick Rowbottom, 2021. "Digital Corporate Reporting: Research Developments and Implications," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 31(3), pages 213-232, September.
    4. Alkhatib, Esra'a & Ojala, Hannu & Collis, Jill, 2019. "Determinants of the voluntary adoption of digital reporting by small private companies to Companies House: Evidence from the UK," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 1-1.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laura Grassi & Davide Lanfranchi, 2022. "RegTech in public and private sectors: the nexus between data, technology and regulation," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 49(3), pages 441-479, September.
    2. Indrit Troshani & Nick Rowbottom, 2021. "Digital Corporate Reporting: Research Developments and Implications," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 31(3), pages 213-232, September.
    3. Fábio Albuquerque & Paula Gomes Dos Santos, 2023. "Recent Trends in Accounting and Information System Research: A Literature Review Using Textual Analysis Tools," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-27, April.
    4. André Gräning & Carsten Felden & Maciej Piechocki, 2011. "Status Quo and Potential of XBRL for Business and Information Systems Engineering," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 3(4), pages 231-239, August.
    5. Troshani, Indrit & Janssen, Marijn & Lymer, Andy & Parker, Lee D., 2018. "Digital transformation of business-to-government reporting: An institutional work perspective," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 17-36.
    6. Saiful Azam, 2014. "Perceived Environmental Factors And The Intention To Adopt A Standard Business Reporting Facility: A Survey Of Australian Corporate Cfos," Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance (AAMJAF), Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia, vol. 10(2), pages 147-173.
    7. Vicky Arnold, 2018. "The changing technological environment and the future of behavioural research in accounting," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 58(2), pages 315-339, June.
    8. Stoel, Dale & Havelka, Douglas & Merhout, Jeffrey W., 2012. "An analysis of attributes that impact information technology audit quality: A study of IT and financial audit practitioners," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 60-79.
    9. Dolinšek Tatjana, 2020. "Application of statistical methods in Internet financial information analysis," Croatian Review of Economic, Business and Social Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 6(1), pages 43-55, May.
    10. Alles, Michael & Piechocki, Maciej, 2012. "Will XBRL improve corporate governance?," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 91-108.
    11. Marek Z. Reformat & Ronald R. Yager, 2015. "Soft Computing Techniques for Querying XBRL Data," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(3), pages 179-199, July.
    12. Dirk Beerbaum & Maciej Piechocki & Christoph Weber, 2017. "Is there a Conflict between Principles-based Standard Setting and Structured Electronic Reporting with XBRL?," European Financial and Accounting Journal, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2017(3), pages 33-52.
    13. Paola Ramassa & Costanza Di Fabio, 2016. "Web-Based Financial Reporting: An Interpretative Model for Corporate Communications on Social Media," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(2), pages 79-112.
    14. Jap Efendi & Jin Dong Park & Chandra Subramaniam, 2016. "Does the XBRL Reporting Format Provide Incremental Information Value? A Study Using XBRL Disclosures During the Voluntary Filing Program," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 52(2), pages 259-285, June.
    15. Zezhong Xiao & Michael John Jones & Andy Lymer, 2002. "Immediate trends in Internet reporting," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2), pages 245-275.
    16. Sonja Gallhofer & Jim Haslam & Elizabeth Monk & Clare Roberts, 2006. "The emancipatory potential of online reporting: The case of counter accounting," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 19(5), pages 681-718, September.
    17. Nirosh Kuruppu & Peter Oyelere & Hamdan Al Jabri, 2015. "Internet Financial Reporting And Disclosure Practices Of Publicly Traded Corporations: Evidence From Sri Lanka," Accounting & Taxation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 7(1), pages 75-91.
    18. Tiancai Xing & Qichuan Jiang & Xuejiao Ma, 2017. "To Facilitate or Curb? The Role of Financial Development in China’s Carbon Emissions Reduction Process: A Novel Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-39, October.
    19. Diana MureÅŸan, 2012. "Retrospective Of Financial Reporting On Capital Market," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 2(14), pages 1-8.
    20. Mihaela Enachi, 2013. "XBRL and Financial Reporting Transparency," BRAND. Broad Research in Accounting, Negotiation, and Distribution, EduSoft Publishing, vol. 4(1), pages 10-19, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    XBRL; Audit reporting;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ijoais:v:15:y:2014:i:4:p:400-422. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-accounting-information-systems/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.