IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/isacfm/v22y2015i3p179-199.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Soft Computing Techniques for Querying XBRL Data

Author

Listed:
  • Marek Z. Reformat
  • Ronald R. Yager

Abstract

Availability of business data is an important aspect of effective financial activities. An easy access to financial information has immense influence on actions and decisions regarding investing, trade and operations of companies and firms. The proposed standard – eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) – provides a means to create a uniform framework for representing corporate and financial information. XBRL defines an easily interpretable, machine‐readable and XML‐based data format. Its flexibility allows for representing business data using different languages, as well as following different regulation standards. One of important benefits of XBRL is application of XML‐based tools and systems that enable easy preparation, processing and validation of corporate data. It is also possible to use XML‐based storage and query systems. In this paper we propose and describe a concept of soft queries. They provide the users with a human‐friendly interface for interacting with XBRL data. These queries are equipped with linguistic terms (such as large, medium, small) and linguistic qualifiers (all, mostly). Such queries are able to provide the users with results similar to the results obtained when they analyse data themselves. Linguistic terms and qualifiers are represented as fuzzy sets. Fuzzy‐based operations and aggregation operators allow for mimicking a human‐like processing of data. The proposed approach is illustrated with queries executed on an XBRL document. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Marek Z. Reformat & Ronald R. Yager, 2015. "Soft Computing Techniques for Querying XBRL Data," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(3), pages 179-199, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:isacfm:v:22:y:2015:i:3:p:179-199
    DOI: 10.1002/isaf.1366
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/isaf.1366
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/isaf.1366?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nina Bočková & Zdeněk Brož & Mirko Dohnal, 2012. "Fuzzy model of relationship among economic performance, competitiveness and business ethics of small and medium-sized enterprises," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 60(4), pages 71-78.
    2. Tsung-Yu Chou & Gin-Shuh Liang, 2001. "Application of a fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for shipping company performance evaluation," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 375-392, October.
    3. O'Riain, Seán & Curry, Edward & Harth, Andreas, 2012. "XBRL and open data for global financial ecosystems: A linked data approach," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 141-162.
    4. Cheng Lee & Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng & Shin-Yun Wang, 2005. "A Fuzzy Set Approach for Generalized CRR Model: An Empirical Analysis of S&P 500 Index Options," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 255-275, November.
    5. Valentinetti, Diego & Rea, Michele A., 2012. "IFRS Taxonomy and financial reporting practices: The case of Italian listed companies," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 163-180.
    6. Alles, Michael & Piechocki, Maciej, 2012. "Will XBRL improve corporate governance?," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 91-108.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Troshani, Indrit & Janssen, Marijn & Lymer, Andy & Parker, Lee D., 2018. "Digital transformation of business-to-government reporting: An institutional work perspective," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 17-36.
    2. Marek Z. Reformat & Ronald R. Yager & Nhuan D. To, 2018. "Defining personalized concepts for XBRL using iPAD‐drawn fuzzy sets," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(2), pages 73-85, April.
    3. Alkhatib, Esra'a & Ojala, Hannu & Collis, Jill, 2019. "Determinants of the voluntary adoption of digital reporting by small private companies to Companies House: Evidence from the UK," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 1-1.
    4. Dirk Beerbaum & Maciej Piechocki & Christoph Weber, 2017. "Is there a Conflict between Principles-based Standard Setting and Structured Electronic Reporting with XBRL?," European Financial and Accounting Journal, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2017(3), pages 33-52.
    5. Kumar, Satish & Marrone, Mauricio & Liu, Qi & Pandey, Nitesh, 2020. "Twenty years of the International Journal of Accounting Information Systems: A bibliometric analysis," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    6. Vicky Arnold, 2018. "The changing technological environment and the future of behavioural research in accounting," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 58(2), pages 315-339, June.
    7. Smimou, K. & Bector, C.R. & Jacoby, G., 2008. "Portfolio selection subject to experts' judgments," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 1036-1054, December.
    8. S. Mostafa Mokhtari & Hamid Alinejad-Rokny & Hossein Jalalifar, 2014. "Selection of the best well control system by using fuzzy multiple-attribute decision-making methods," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(5), pages 1105-1121, May.
    9. Hongjun Dai & Tao Sun & Wen Guo, 2016. "Brownfield Redevelopment Evaluation Based on Fuzzy Real Options," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-10, February.
    10. Indrit Troshani & Nick Rowbottom, 2021. "Digital Corporate Reporting: Research Developments and Implications," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 31(3), pages 213-232, September.
    11. Valentinetti, Diego & Flores Muñoz, Francisco, 2021. "Internet of things: Emerging impacts on digital reporting," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 549-562.
    12. Donald Ukpanyang & Julio Terrados-Cepeda & Manuel Jesus Hermoso-Orzaez, 2022. "Multi-Criteria Selection of Waste-to-Energy Technologies for Slum/Informal Settlements Using the PROMETHEE Technique: A Case Study of the Greater Karu Urban Area in Nigeria," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-26, May.
    13. Flitsch, Verena & Brümmerstedt, Katrin, 2015. "Freight Transport Modelling of Container Hinterland Supply Chains," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Blecker, Thorsten & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Operational Excellence in Logistics and Supply Chains: Optimization Methods, Data-driven Approaches and Security Insights. Proceedings of the Hamburg , volume 22, pages 233-266, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    14. Zorio-Grima, Ana & Merello, Paloma, 2020. "Consumer confidence: Causality links with subjective and objective information sources," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    15. Alessio Faccia & Francesco Manni & Fabian Capitanio, 2021. "Mandatory ESG Reporting and XBRL Taxonomies Combination: ESG Ratings and Income Statement, a Sustainable Value-Added Disclosure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-17, August.
    16. Fábio Albuquerque & Paula Gomes Dos Santos, 2023. "Recent Trends in Accounting and Information System Research: A Literature Review Using Textual Analysis Tools," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-27, April.
    17. Yow-Jen Jou & Chih-Wei Wang & Wan-Chien Chiu, 2013. "Is the realized volatility good for option pricing during the recent financial crisis?," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 171-188, January.
    18. Jie Zhou, 2020. "Does one size fit all? Evidence on XBRL adoption and 10‐K filing lag," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(3), pages 3183-3213, September.
    19. Sakthivel, G. & Sivaraja, C.M. & Ikua, Bernard W., 2019. "Prediction OF CI engine performance, emission and combustion parameters using fish oil as a biodiesel by fuzzy-GA," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 287-306.
    20. Chou, Chi-Chun & Chang, C. Janie & Peng, Jacob, 2016. "Integrating XBRL data with textual information in Chinese: A semantic web approach," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 32-46.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:isacfm:v:22:y:2015:i:3:p:179-199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1099-1174/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.