IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ijoais/v15y2014i4p381-399.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The financial close process: Implications for future research

Author

Listed:
  • Janvrin, Diane
  • Mascha, Maureen Francis

Abstract

This study advances our understanding of the current financial close process. Attention to the topic is warranted for four reasons. First, economic volatility and growth in restatements have increased pressure on companies to report performance timely, completely, and accurately to market participants. Second, recent regulations have increased the workload for accountants at period end thus negatively impacting the efficiency of the close process. Third, several SEC filings have contained control weaknesses related to the financial close process. Finally, academic research suggests that the time needed to complete the financial close process may serve as a proxy for a company's internal information environment quality. We draw upon prior research and conduct a field investigation with corporate financial officers from 22 different organizations to examine the role of four factors – need to meet expectations, collaboration among multiple participants, estimation process, and ability to incorporate new regulations – in the financial close process. Results suggest that researchers should examine further how the need to meet (or beat) expectations impacts management's actions and the effectiveness and efficiency of the financial close process. Future work could also explore how hidden profile task research and technology advances may improve the financial close process. Finally, research needs to examine how ex post estimate analysis may improve not only estimate quality but also the effectiveness and efficiency of the financial close process.

Suggested Citation

  • Janvrin, Diane & Mascha, Maureen Francis, 2014. "The financial close process: Implications for future research," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 381-399.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ijoais:v:15:y:2014:i:4:p:381-399
    DOI: 10.1016/j.accinf.2014.05.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1467089514000335
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.accinf.2014.05.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anwer S. Ahmed & Richard A. Schneible & Douglas E. Stevens, 2003. "An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Online Trading on Stock Price and Trading Volume Reactions to Earnings Announcements," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(3), pages 413-439, September.
    2. Beaver, Wh & Clarke, R & Wright, Wf, 1979. "Association Between Unsystematic Security Returns And The Magnitude Of Earnings Forecast Errors," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(2), pages 316-340.
    3. D. Eric Hirst & Kevin E. Jackson & Lisa Koonce, 2003. "Improving Financial Reports by Revealing the Accuracy of Prior Estimates," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(1), pages 165-193, March.
    4. Williams, James W., 2013. "Regulatory technologies, risky subjects, and financial boundaries: Governing ‘fraud’ in the financial markets," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 544-558.
    5. John P. Lightle & John H. Kagel & Hal R. Arkes, 2009. "Information Exchange in Group Decision Making: The Hidden Profile Problem Reconsidered," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(4), pages 568-581, April.
    6. Sunder, Shyam, 0. "Adverse effects of uniform written reporting standards on accounting practice, education, and research," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 99-114, March.
    7. Jeffrey Cohen & Ganesh Krishnamoorthy & Arnold M. Wright, 2002. "Corporate Governance and the Audit Process," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(4), pages 573-594, December.
    8. Lobo, Gerald J & Tung, Samuel S, 2000. "Financial Analysts' Earnings Forecast Dispersion and Intraday Stock Price Variability around Quarterly Earnings Announcements," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 137-151, September.
    9. Debreceny, Roger & Farewell, Stephanie & Piechocki, Maciej & Felden, Carsten & Gräning, André, 2010. "Does it add up? Early evidence on the data quality of XBRL filings to the SEC," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 296-306, June.
    10. Craig W. Fisher & InduShobha Chengalur-Smith & Donald P. Ballou, 2003. "The Impact of Experience and Time on the Use of Data Quality Information in Decision Making," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 14(2), pages 170-188, June.
    11. Fred D. Davis & Richard P. Bagozzi & Paul R. Warshaw, 1989. "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(8), pages 982-1003, August.
    12. D. Eric Hirst & Lisa Koonce, 1996. "Audit Analytical Procedures: A Field Investigation," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(2), pages 457-486, September.
    13. Donald P. Ballou & Harold L. Pazer, 1995. "Designing Information Systems to Optimize the Accuracy-Timeliness Tradeoff," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 6(1), pages 51-72, March.
    14. Doyle, Jeffrey & Ge, Weili & McVay, Sarah, 2007. "Determinants of weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(1-2), pages 193-223, September.
    15. Abarbanell, Jeffery S. & Lanen, William N. & Verrecchia, Robert E., 1995. "Analysts' forecasts as proxies for investor beliefs in empirical research," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 31-60, July.
    16. Martijn van der Steen, 2011. "The emergence and change of management accounting routines," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 24(4), pages 502-547, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jonnergård, Karin & von Koch, Christopher & Nilsson, Ola, 2020. "Information environment – An exploration and clarification of the concept based on prior literature," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    2. Vicky Arnold, 2018. "The changing technological environment and the future of behavioural research in accounting," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 58(2), pages 315-339, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. DeFond, Mark & Zhang, Jieying, 2014. "A review of archival auditing research," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 275-326.
    2. Gil S. Bae & Seung UK Choi & Phillip T. Lamoreaux & Jae Eun Lee, 2021. "Auditors' Fee Premiums and Low‐Quality Internal Controls," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(1), pages 586-620, March.
    3. Yigitbasioglu, Ogan M., 2015. "External auditors' perceptions of cloud computing adoption in Australia," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 46-62.
    4. Hermanson, Dana R., 2015. "“Model 2”—A personal journey in pursuit of creativity and impact," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 130-140.
    5. Chan, Terence & Watson, Iain & Wee, Marvin, 2005. "The impact of the Internet on earnings announcements," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 263-300, June.
    6. Hazen, Benjamin T. & Weigel, Fred K. & Ezell, Jeremy D. & Boehmke, Bradley C. & Bradley, Randy V., 2017. "Toward understanding outcomes associated with data quality improvement," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 737-747.
    7. Kristian D. Allee & Matthew D. Deangelis & James R. Moon, 2018. "Disclosure “Scriptability”," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(2), pages 363-430, May.
    8. Dominikus Kleindienst, 2017. "The data quality improvement plan: deciding on choice and sequence of data quality improvements," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 27(4), pages 387-398, November.
    9. Jingran Wang & Yi Liu & Peigong Li & Zhenxing Lin & Stavros Sindakis & Sakshi Aggarwal, 2024. "Overview of Data Quality: Examining the Dimensions, Antecedents, and Impacts of Data Quality," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 1159-1178, March.
    10. Marie-Paule Laurent, 2003. "The effect of earnings release for Belgian listed companies," Working Papers CEB 03-005.RS, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    11. Christian Arnold & Kai-Ingo Voigt, 2019. "Determinants of Industrial Internet of Things Adoption in German Manufacturing Companies," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(06), pages 1-21, October.
    12. Philippe Cohard, 2020. "Information Systems Values: A Study of the Intranet in Three French Higher Education Institutions," Post-Print hal-02987225, HAL.
    13. Awni Rawashdeh, 2013. "Study Toward The Understanding Of Behavioral Intention To Use A Customer Relationship Management (Crm) Systems," Far East Journal of Psychology and Business, Far East Research Centre, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, September.
    14. Melih Engin & Fatih Gürses, 2019. "Adoption of Hospital Information Systems in Public Hospitals in Turkey: An Analysis with the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology Model," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(06), pages 1-19, October.
    15. Giada Baldessarelli & Nathalie Lazaric & Michele Pezzoni, 2022. "Organizational routines: Evolution in the research landscape of two core communities," Post-Print halshs-03718851, HAL.
    16. Hasan, Rajibul & Lowe, Ben & Petrovici, Dan, 2020. "Consumer adoption of pro-poor service innovations in subsistence marketplaces," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 461-475.
    17. Morosan, Cristian, 2016. "An empirical examination of U.S. travelers’ intentions to use biometric e-gates in airports," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 120-128.
    18. Tsung Teng Chen, 2012. "The development and empirical study of a literature review aiding system," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 92(1), pages 105-116, July.
    19. Spira, Robin, 2024. "How does ESG rating disagreement influence analyst forecast dispersion?," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 9(3), pages 1769-1804.
    20. Lawrence Bunnell & Kweku-Muata Osei-Bryson & Victoria Y. Yoon, 0. "RecSys Issues Ontology: A Knowledge Classification of Issues for Recommender Systems Researchers," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-42.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ijoais:v:15:y:2014:i:4:p:381-399. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-accounting-information-systems/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.