IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v121y2017i8p831-835.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring and managing health system performance: An update from New Zealand

Author

Listed:
  • Chalmers, Linda Maree
  • Ashton, Toni
  • Tenbensel, Tim

Abstract

In July 2016, New Zealand introduced a new approach to measuring and monitoring health system performance. This ‘Systems Level Measure Framework’ (SLMF) has evolved from the Integrated Performance and Incentive Framework (IPIF) previously reported in this journal. The SLMF is designed to stimulate a ‘whole of system’ approach that requires inter-organisational collaboration. Local ‘Alliances’ between government and non-government health sector organisations are responsible for planning and achieving improved health system outcomes such as reducing ambulatory sensitive hospitalisation for young children, and reducing acute hospital bed days. It marks a shift from the previous regime of output and process targets, and from a pay-for-performance approach to primary care. Some elements of the earlier IPIF proposal, such as general practice quality measures, and tiered levels of performance, were not included in the SLM framework. The focus on health system outcomes demonstrates policy commitment to effective integration of health services. However, there remain considerable challenges to successful implementation. An outcomes framework makes it challenging to attribute changes in outcomes to organisational and collaborative strategies. At the local level, the strength and functioning of collaborative relationships between organisations vary considerably. The extent and pace of change may also be constrained by existing funding arrangements in the health system.

Suggested Citation

  • Chalmers, Linda Maree & Ashton, Toni & Tenbensel, Tim, 2017. "Measuring and managing health system performance: An update from New Zealand," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(8), pages 831-835.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:121:y:2017:i:8:p:831-835
    DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.05.012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851017301501
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.05.012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Van Herten, Loes M. & Gunning-Shepers, Louise J., 2000. "Targets as a tool in health policy. Part II: guidelines for application," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 13-23, August.
    2. van Herten, Loes M. & Gunning-Schepers, Louise J., 2000. "Targets as a tool in health policy: Part I: lessons learned," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 1-11, August.
    3. Busse, Reinhard & Wismar, Matthias, 2002. "Health target programmes and health care services--any link?: A conceptual and comparative study (part 1)," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(3), pages 209-221, March.
    4. Ashton, Toni, 2015. "Measuring health system performance: A new approach to accountability and quality improvement in New Zealand," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(8), pages 999-1004.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Akmal, Adeel & Podgorodnichenko, Nataliya & Foote, Jeff & Greatbanks, Richard & Stokes, Tim & Gauld, Robin, 2021. "Why is Quality Improvement so Challenging? A Viable Systems Model Perspective to Understand the Frustrations of Healthcare Quality Improvement Managers," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(5), pages 658-664.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tereza Aubrechtová & Eva Semančíková & Pavel Raška, 2020. "Formulation Matters! The Failure of Integrating Landscape Fragmentation Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-21, May.
    2. Peiro, Rosana & Alvarez-Dardet, Carlos & Plasencia, Antoni & Borrell, Carme & Colomer, Concha & Moya, Carmela & Pasarin, M. Isabel & Zafra, Eduardo, 2002. "Rapid appraisal methodology for `health for all' policy formulation analysis," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 309-328, December.
    3. Fukuda, Yoshiharu & Nakamura, Keiko & Takano, Takehito, 2002. "A combination of an extrapolation method and a benchmark method to develop quantitative health targets for Japan," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 201-212, August.
    4. Lelieveldt, Herman, 2023. "Food industry influence in collaborative governance: The case of the Dutch prevention agreement on overweight," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    5. Busse, Reinhard & Wismar, Matthias, 2002. "Health target programmes and health care services--any link?: A conceptual and comparative study (part 1)," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(3), pages 209-221, March.
    6. Lager, Anton & Guldbrandsson, Karin & Fossum, Bjoorn, 2007. "The chance of Sweden's public health targets making a difference," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(3), pages 413-421, March.
    7. Fu, Hwai-Hui & Tsai, Hsien-Tang & Lin, Ching-Wei & Wei, Duan, 2004. "Application of a single sampling plan for auditing medical-claim payments made by Taiwan National Health Insurance," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(2), pages 185-195, November.
    8. Khaleghian, Peyvand & Gupta, Monica Das, 2005. "Public management and the essential public health functions," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 33(7), pages 1083-1099, July.
    9. Wismar, Matthias & Busse, Reinhard, 2002. "Outcome-related health targets--political strategies for better health outcomes: A conceptual and comparative study (part 2)," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(3), pages 223-241, March.
    10. Sérgio Chicumbe & Maria do Rosário Oliveira Martins, 2022. "Factors Associated with Underutilization of Maternity Health Care Cascade in Mozambique: Analysis of the 2015 National Health Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-16, June.
    11. Rajko Ostojic & Vlatka Bilas & Sanja Franc, 2013. "Governance Of Health Care Systems In The Era Of Increased International Integration," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 9(2), pages 101-110.
    12. Vainieri, Milena & Vola, Federico & Gomez Soriano, Gregorio & Nuti, Sabina, 2016. "How to set challenging goals and conduct fair evaluation in regional public health systems. Insights from Valencia and Tuscany Regions," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(11), pages 1270-1278.
    13. Tenbensel, Tim & Burau, Viola, 2017. "Contrasting approaches to primary care performance governance in Denmark and New Zealand," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(8), pages 853-861.
    14. Backman, Chantal & Vanderloo, Saskia & Forster, Alan John, 2016. "Measuring and improving quality in university hospitals in Canada: The Collaborative for Excellence in Healthcare Quality," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(9), pages 982-986.
    15. Rietbergen, Martijn G. & Blok, Kornelis, 2010. "Setting SMART targets for industrial energy use and industrial energy efficiency," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 4339-4354, August.
    16. Thu Doan Ngoc Vuong & Loi Tan Nguyen, 2022. "The Key Strategies for Measuring Employee Performance in Companies: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-21, October.
    17. van Herten, Loes M. & Gunning-Schepers, Louise J., 2000. "Targets as a tool in health policy: Part I: lessons learned," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 1-11, August.
    18. Sabina Nuti & Sara Barsanti, 2011. "Can equity be included in a performance evaluation system? Some evidences from the tuscan health care system," Working Papers 201105, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna of Pisa, Istituto di Management.
    19. Dohmen, Peter J.G. & van Raaij, Erik M., 2019. "A new approach to preferred provider selection in health care," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(3), pages 300-305.
    20. Camille Poroes & Laurence Seematter-Bagnoud & Kaspar Wyss & Isabelle Peytremann-Bridevaux, 2023. "Health System Performance and Resilience in Times of Crisis: An Adapted Conceptual Framework," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(17), pages 1-23, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:121:y:2017:i:8:p:831-835. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.