IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v119y2015i8p999-1004.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring health system performance: A new approach to accountability and quality improvement in New Zealand

Author

Listed:
  • Ashton, Toni

Abstract

In February 2014, the New Zealand Ministry of Health released a new framework for measuring the performance of the New Zealand health system. The two key aims are to strengthen accountability to taxpayers and to lift the performance of the system's component parts using a ‘whole-of-system’ approach to performance measurement. Development of this new framework – called the Integrated Performance and Incentive Framework (IPIF) – was stimulated by a need for a performance management framework which reflects the health system as a whole, which encourages primary and secondary providers to work towards the same end, and which incorporates the needs and priorities of local communities. Measures within the IPIF will be set at two levels: the system level, where measures are set nationally, and the local district level, where measures which contribute towards the system level indicators will be selected by local health alliances. In the first year, the framework applies only at the system level and only to primary health care services. It will continue to be developed over time and will gradually be extended to cover a wide range of health and disability services. The success of the IPIF in improving health sector performance depends crucially on the willingness of health sector personnel to engage closely with the measurement process.

Suggested Citation

  • Ashton, Toni, 2015. "Measuring health system performance: A new approach to accountability and quality improvement in New Zealand," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(8), pages 999-1004.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:119:y:2015:i:8:p:999-1004
    DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.04.012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851015001190
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.04.012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eijkenaar, Frank & Emmert, Martin & Scheppach, Manfred & Schöffski, Oliver, 2013. "Effects of pay for performance in health care: A systematic review of systematic reviews," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(2), pages 115-130.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sérgio Chicumbe & Maria do Rosário Oliveira Martins, 2022. "Factors Associated with Underutilization of Maternity Health Care Cascade in Mozambique: Analysis of the 2015 National Health Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-16, June.
    2. Backman, Chantal & Vanderloo, Saskia & Forster, Alan John, 2016. "Measuring and improving quality in university hospitals in Canada: The Collaborative for Excellence in Healthcare Quality," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(9), pages 982-986.
    3. Camille Poroes & Laurence Seematter-Bagnoud & Kaspar Wyss & Isabelle Peytremann-Bridevaux, 2023. "Health System Performance and Resilience in Times of Crisis: An Adapted Conceptual Framework," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(17), pages 1-23, August.
    4. Dohmen, Peter J.G. & van Raaij, Erik M., 2019. "A new approach to preferred provider selection in health care," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(3), pages 300-305.
    5. Tenbensel, Tim & Burau, Viola, 2017. "Contrasting approaches to primary care performance governance in Denmark and New Zealand," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(8), pages 853-861.
    6. Chalmers, Linda Maree & Ashton, Toni & Tenbensel, Tim, 2017. "Measuring and managing health system performance: An update from New Zealand," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(8), pages 831-835.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Herbst, T. & Foerster, J. & Emmert, M., 2018. "The impact of pay-for-performance on the quality of care in ophthalmology: Empirical evidence from Germany," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(6), pages 667-673.
    2. Ammi, Mehdi & Fortier, Grant, 2017. "The influence of welfare systems on pay-for-performance programs for general practitioners: A critical review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 157-166.
    3. Hinterhuber, Andreas, 2017. "Value quantification capabilities in industrial markets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 163-178.
    4. Nadja Kairies-Schwarz & Claudia Souček, 2020. "Performance Pay in Hospitals: An Experiment on Bonus–Malus Incentives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-29, November.
    5. Carmen Carpio & Natalia Santiago Bench, 2015. "The Health Workforce in Latin America and the Caribbean," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 22027.
    6. Aryankhesal, Aidin & Sheldon, Trevor A. & Mannion, Russell, 2014. "Impact of the Iranian hospital grading system on hospitals’ adherence to audited standards: An examination of possible mechanisms," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 206-214.
    7. Karen S Palmer & Thomas Agoritsas & Danielle Martin & Taryn Scott & Sohail M Mulla & Ashley P Miller & Arnav Agarwal & Andrew Bresnahan & Afeez Abiola Hazzan & Rebecca A Jeffery & Arnaud Merglen & Ahm, 2014. "Activity-Based Funding of Hospitals and Its Impact on Mortality, Readmission, Discharge Destination, Severity of Illness, and Volume of Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-1, October.
    8. Galina Besstremyannaya & Sergei Golovan, 2019. "Physician’s altruism in incentive contracts: Medicare’s quality race," CINCH Working Paper Series 1903, Universitaet Duisburg-Essen, Competent in Competition and Health.
    9. Meliyanni Johar & Glenn Jones & Elizabeth Savage, 2014. "What Explains The Quality And Price Of Gp Services? An Investigation Using Linked Survey And Administrative Data," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(9), pages 1115-1133, September.
    10. Lina Maria Ellegård, 2020. "Effects of pay-for-performance on prescription of hypertension drugs among public and private primary care providers in Sweden," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 215-228, September.
    11. Martin Chalkley & Andrew J. Mirelman & Luigi Siciliani & Marc Suhrcke & Peter Berman, 2020. "Paying for Performance for Health Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: An Economic Perspective," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Paul Revill & Marc Suhrcke & Rodrigo Moreno-Serra & Mark Sculpher (ed.), Global Health Economics Shaping Health Policy in Low- and Middle-Income Countries, chapter 6, pages 157-190, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    12. Ogundeji, Yewande Kofoworola & Bland, John Martin & Sheldon, Trevor Andrew, 2016. "The effectiveness of payment for performance in health care: A meta-analysis and exploration of variation in outcomes," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(10), pages 1141-1150.
    13. Jacky MATHONNAT & Aurore PELISSIER, 2017. "How a Results-Based Financing approach can contribute to the health Sustainable Development Goals - Policy-oriented lessons: what we know, what we need to know and don’t yet know," Working Papers P204, FERDI.
    14. Alina Peluso & Paolo Berta & Veronica Vinciotti, 2019. "Do pay-for-performance incentives lead to a better health outcome?," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 56(6), pages 2167-2184, June.
    15. Brosig-Koch, Jeannette & Groß, Mona & Hennig-Schmidt, Heike & Kairies-Schwarz, Nadja & Wiesen, Daniel, 2021. "Physicians' incentives, patients' characteristics, and quality of care: A systematic experimental comparison of fee-for-service, capitation, and pay for performance," Ruhr Economic Papers 923, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    16. Da Silva, Nicolas & Gadreau, Maryse, 2015. "La médecine libérale en France," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 17.
    17. Brosig-Koch, Jeannette & Hennig-Schmidt, Heike & Kairies-Schwarz, Nadja & Kokot, Johanna & Wiesen, Daniel, 2024. "A new look at physicians’ responses to financial incentives: Quality of care, practice characteristics, and motivations," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    18. Krauth, Christian & Liersch, Sebastian & Jensen, Sören & Amelung, Volker Eric, 2016. "Would German physicians opt for pay-for-performance programs? A willingness-to-accept experiment in a large general practitioners’ sample," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(2), pages 148-158.
    19. Jackson, John & Ruffini, Oriana & Livet, Melanie & Urick, Ben, 2022. "Funding community pharmacy dispensing: A qualitative exploration of current and alternate models leading to the development of quality focused funding principles," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(12), pages 1263-1268.
    20. Laura Anselmi & Julius Ohrnberger & Eleonora Fichera & Pedroso Nhassengo & Quinhas F. Fernandes & Sergio Chicumbe, 2023. "The impact of performance‐based financing within local health systems: Evidence from Mozambique," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(7), pages 1525-1549, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:119:y:2015:i:8:p:999-1004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.