IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v99y2019icp123-135.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Natura 2000 payments for private forest owners in Rural Development Programmes 2007–2013 - a comparative view

Author

Listed:
  • Sarvašová, Zuzana
  • Ali, Tamás
  • Đorđević, Ilija
  • Lukmine, Diana
  • Quiroga, Sonia
  • Suárez, Cristina
  • Hrib, Michal
  • Rondeux, Jacques
  • Mantzanas, Konstantinos T.
  • Franz, Kristin

Abstract

The role of Natura 2000 network is to ensure the long-term survival of Europe's most valuable and threatened species and habitats. Ecologically valuable forest ecosystems are often owned or managed by private forest owners. Natura 2000 benefits communities by enhancing tourism, regional brands and marketing. In private forests, however, its restrictions imposed on land owners cause financial losses in comparison to the usual forest management. The paper compares the level at which the compensation mechanism within the European Rural Development Programmes (RDP) for the period 2007–2013 was implemented in seven European Union countries - Belgium, the Czech Republic, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Lithuania and Slovakia. The research focuses on compensation and restrictions within Measure 224 - Natura 2000 Payments - imposed on forest owners in Natura 2000 sites. To obtain the data, a non-reactive research method was applied using a content analysis of the existing documentation. The data sources include European and national statistics and expert knowledge based on common terms of reference. The results show that due to substantial gaps in the implementation of Measure 224 across the EU, there are significant differences in compensation and restrictions for private forest owners in individual countries of the European Union (EU). As opposed to the initial expectations of the measure, the financial support reached less than a third of the forest holdings and less than half of the forest land. The member states (MSs) which implemented the measure spent 92% of their original budget on average. Moreover, rural development funds for private forest owners are very limited and the implementation of Measure 224 says nothing about the success of Natura 2000 with regard to biodiversity targets in private forests. One approach to financing Natura 2000 network is a comprehensive use of all existing EU funds, another would be to propose own Natura 2000 fund.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarvašová, Zuzana & Ali, Tamás & Đorđević, Ilija & Lukmine, Diana & Quiroga, Sonia & Suárez, Cristina & Hrib, Michal & Rondeux, Jacques & Mantzanas, Konstantinos T. & Franz, Kristin, 2019. "Natura 2000 payments for private forest owners in Rural Development Programmes 2007–2013 - a comparative view," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 123-135.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:99:y:2019:i:c:p:123-135
    DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2017.08.019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934117301703
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.08.019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lehtonen, Heikki & Lankoski, Jussi E. & Niemi, Jyrki S., 2005. "Evaluating the Impact of Alternative Agricultural Policy Scenarios on Multifunctionality: A Case Study of Finland," ENARPRI Working Papers 25137, European Network of Agricultural and Rural Policy Research Institutes (ENARPRI).
    2. Heikki Lehtonen & Jussi Lankoski & Jyrki Niemi, 2005. "Evaluating the Impact of Alternative Policy Scenarios on Multifunctionality: A Case Study of Finland," ENARPRI Working Papers 013, ENARPRI (European Network of Agricultural and Rural Policy Research Institutes).
    3. Rosenkranz, Lydia & Seintsch, Björn & Wippel, Bernd & Dieter, Matthias, 2014. "Income losses due to the implementation of the Habitats Directive in forests — Conclusions from a case study in Germany," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 207-218.
    4. Elands, Birgit H. M. & Wiersum, K. Freerk, 2001. "Forestry and rural development in Europe: an exploration of socio-political discourses," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(1-2), pages 5-16, September.
    5. Raoul Beunen, 2006. "European nature conservation legislation and spatial planning: For better or for worse?," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(4), pages 605-619.
    6. Laura A German & Alain Karsenty & Anne-Marie Tiani & Carol Colfer & E Barrow & C Küchli & J Blaser & W Wardojo & JC Ribot & Chimere Diaw & P Jagger & T Blomley & H Ramadhani & Y Mkwizu & A Böhringer &, 2010. "Governing Africa's forests in a globalized world," Selected Books, CIRAD, Forest department, UPR40, edition 1, volume 1, number 15 edited by Laura A German & Alain Karsenty & Anne-Marie Tiani.
    7. Jarský, Vilém & Sarvašová, Zuzana & Dobšinská, Zuzana & Ventrubová, Kateřina & Sarvaš, Milan, 2014. "Public support for forestry from EU funds – Cases of Czech Republic and Slovak Republic," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 380-395.
    8. Geitzenauer, Maria & Blondet, Marieke & de Koning, Jessica & Ferranti, Francesca & Sotirov, Metodi & Weiss, Gerhard & Winkel, Georg, 2017. "The challenge of financing the implementation of Natura 2000 – Empirical evidence from six European Union Member States," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 3-13.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Quiroga, Sonia & Suárez, Cristina & Hernanz, Virginia & Aguiño, José Evelio & Fernández-Manjarrés, Juan F., 2024. "Analysing post-conflict policies to enhance socio-ecological restoration among black communities in Southern Colombia: Cacao cropping as a win–win strategy," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    2. Nichiforel, Liviu & Deuffic, Philippe & Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark & Weiss, Gerhard & Hujala, Teppo & Keary, Kevin & Lawrence, Anna & Avdibegović, Mersudin & Dobšinská, Zuzana & Feliciano, Diana & Górriz-, 2020. "Two decades of forest-related legislation changes in European countries analysed from a property rights perspective," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    3. Deegen, Peter, 2019. "The political economy of biodiversity in representative democracy: Between the expressive and the instrumental domain," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 1-1.
    4. Quiroga, Sonia & Suarez, Cristina & Ficko, Andrej & Feliciano, Diana & Bouriaud, Laura & Brahic, Elodie & Deuffic, Philippe & Dobsinska, Zuzana & Jarsky, Vilem & Lawrence, Anna & Nybakk, Erlend, 2019. "What influences European private forest owners' affinity for subsidies?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 136-144.
    5. Lessa Derci Augustynczik, Andrey & Yousefpour, Rasoul, 2021. "Assessing the synergistic value of ecosystem services in European beech forests," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    6. Nichiforel, Liviu & Duduman, Gabriel & Scriban, Ramona Elena & Popa, Bogdan & Barnoaiea, Ionut & Drăgoi, Marian, 2021. "Forest ecosystem services in Romania: Orchestrating regulatory and voluntary planning documents," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    7. Dobšinská, Zuzana & Báliková, Klára & Jarský, Vilém & Hríb, Michal & Štifil, Roman & Šálka, Jaroslav, 2024. "Evaluation analysis of the compensation payments schemes for ecosystem services: The case of Czech and Slovak Republic," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    8. Luca Battisti & Federica Larcher & Stefania Grella & Nunzio Di Bartolo & Marco Devecchi, 2022. "Management and Mapping Ecosystem Services in a Privately Owned Natura 2000 Site: An Insight into the Stellantis–La Mandria Site (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-15, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Helin, Janne, 2008. "Environmental protection of agriculture -clash of policies?," 107th Seminar, January 30-February 1, 2008, Sevilla, Spain 6468, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Zimmermann, Albert, 2008. "Combination of the Swiss agrarian sector model SILAS-dyn with the life cycle assessment tool SALCA," 107th Seminar, January 30-February 1, 2008, Sevilla, Spain 6603, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Jarský, Vilém, 2015. "Analysis of the sectoral innovation system for forestry of the Czech Republic. Does it even exist?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 56-65.
    4. Arts, Bas, 2014. "Assessing forest governance from a ‘Triple G’ perspective: Government, governance, governmentality⁎⁎This article belongs to the Special Issue: Assessing Forest Governance," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 17-22.
    5. Martins, A. & Novais, A. & Santos, J.L. & Canadas, M.J., 2021. "Experts’ multiple criteria evaluations of fuel management options to reduce wildfire susceptibility. The role of closer knowledge of the local socioeconomic context," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    6. YIlmaz, Bülent & Dasdemir, Ismet & Atmis, Erdogan & Lise, Wietze, 2010. "Factors affecting rural development in turkey: BartIn case study," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 239-249, April.
    7. Weller, Priska & Elsasser, Peter, 2018. "Preferences for forest structural attributes in Germany – Evidence from a choice experiment," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 1-9.
    8. Hoogstra, Marjanke A. & Schanz, Heiner & Freerk Wiersum, K., 2004. "The future of European forestry--between urbanization and rural development," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 6(5), pages 441-445, August.
    9. Raoul Beunen & Kristof van Assche, 2013. "Contested Delineations: Planning, Law, and the Governance of Protected Areas," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(6), pages 1285-1301, June.
    10. Winkel, Georg & Lovrić, Marko & Muys, Bart & Katila, Pia & Lundhede, Thomas & Pecurul, Mireia & Pettenella, Davide & Pipart, Nathalie & Plieninger, Tobias & Prokofieva, Irina & Parra, Constanza & Pülz, 2022. "Governing Europe's forests for multiple ecosystem services: Opportunities, challenges, and policy options," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    11. Katarina Haugen, 2016. "Contested Lands? Dissonance and Common Ground in Stakeholder Views on Forest Values," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 107(4), pages 421-434, September.
    12. Janni Kunttu & Venla Wallius & Martti Kulvik & Pekka Leskinen & Jussi Lintunen & Timokleia Orfanidou & Diana Tuomasjukka, 2022. "Exploring 2040: Global Trends and International Policies Setting Frames for the Finnish Wood-Based Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-20, August.
    13. Jarský, Vilém & Sarvašová, Zuzana & Dobšinská, Zuzana & Ventrubová, Kateřina & Sarvaš, Milan, 2014. "Public support for forestry from EU funds – Cases of Czech Republic and Slovak Republic," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 380-395.
    14. Minetos, Dionysios & Polyzos, Serafeim, 2010. "Deforestation processes in Greece: A spatial analysis by using an ordinal regression model," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(6), pages 457-472, July.
    15. Haeler, Elena & Bolte, Andreas & Buchacher, Rafael & Hänninen, Harri & Jandl, Robert & Juutinen, Artti & Kuhlmey, Katharina & Kurttila, Mikko & Lidestav, Gun & Mäkipää, Raisa & Rosenkranz, Lydia & Tri, 2023. "Forest subsidy distribution in five European countries," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    16. Kalonga, Severin Kusonyola & Kulindwa, Kassim Athumani, 2017. "Does forest certification enhance livelihood conditions? Empirical evidence from forest management in Kilwa District, Tanzania," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 49-61.
    17. Selby, Ashley & Koskela, Terhi & Petajisto, Leena, 2007. "Evidence of lay and professional forest-based development discourses in three contrasting regions of Finland," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(6), pages 633-646, February.
    18. George Atisa & Aziza Zemrani & Matthew Weiss, 2018. "Indigenous People’s Environmental Concerns: The Missing Piece in Ongoing Administrative and Political Decentralization in Africa," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(5), pages 288-288, September.
    19. Elands, Birgit H. M. & O'Leary, Tomas N. & Boerwinkel, Henk W. J. & Freerk Wiersum, K., 2004. "Forests as a mirror of rural conditions; local views on the role of forests across Europe," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 6(5), pages 469-482, August.
    20. Myers, Gregory & Sanjak, Jolyne, 2022. "Reflections on the limited impact of the VGGT in sub saharan Africa and opportunities for its future with lessons from Nigeria and Sierra Leone," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:99:y:2019:i:c:p:123-135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.