IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v123y2021ics1389934120306791.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The evolution and impact of timber markets in China's southern collective forest region

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Lanying
  • Lu, Gang
  • Shen, Yueqin

Abstract

Previous studies have paid limited attention to the evolution of timber markets and the levies of taxes and fees on timber sales. The purpose of our work is to fill this knowledge gap using qualitative and quantitative methods coupled with longitudinal data collected from three counties in the Chinese provinces of Zhejiang, Jiangxi, and Fujian. Our analysis shows that while market opening has been a key part of the economic reforms since the early 1980s, it has failed to deliver a fundamentally improved incentive structure to forest producers until very recently. This is due to the severe distortions caused by the imposition of price control and taxes and fees, in addition to the logging restrictions. These distortions caused tremendous sacrifices for so long that the local communities have not demonstrated positive responses, as reflected in changed forest condition—removal, area, and stocking. There remain challenges for the markets to function adequately, including restrictions on silvicultural practices, takings of private timberland without fair compensation, and the weak linkages between wood producers and consumers. We argue that China's experience and lesson are of broad international relevance.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Lanying & Lu, Gang & Shen, Yueqin, 2021. "The evolution and impact of timber markets in China's southern collective forest region," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:123:y:2021:i:c:s1389934120306791
    DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102353
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934120306791
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102353?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yin, Runsheng & Newman, David H., 1997. "Impacts of rural reforms: the case of the Chinese forest sector," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(3), pages 291-305, July.
    2. Liu, Can & Wang, Sen & Liu, Hao & Zhu, Wenqing, 2019. "Reprint of: Why did the 1980s' reform of collective forestland tenure in southern China fail?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 8-18.
    3. Zhang Yiwen & Shashi Kant & Hexing Long, 2020. "Collective Action Dilemma after China’s Forest Tenure Reform: Operationalizing Forest Devolution in a Rapidly Changing Society," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-18, February.
    4. Li, Lanying & Shen, Yueqin & Xu, Xiuying & Zhang, Yong & Gu, Guangtong, 2020. "Stumpage price determination in China's collective forest region, Zhejiang as an example," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    5. Yin, Runsheng, 1998. "Forestry and the environment in China: the current situation and strategic choices," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 26(12), pages 2153-2167, December.
    6. Ke, Shuifa & Qiao, Dan & Yuan, Wantong & He, Youjun, 2020. "Broadening the scope of forest transition inquiry: What does China's experience suggest?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    7. Lin, Justin Yifu, 1992. "Rural Reforms and Agricultural Growth in China," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 82(1), pages 34-51, March.
    8. Hou, Jianyun & Yin, Runsheng & Wu, Weiguang, 2019. "Intensifying Forest Management in China: What does it mean, why, and how?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 82-89.
    9. Ronald Coase & Ning Wang, 2012. "How China Became Capitalist," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-137-01937-0.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ziqiang Zhang & Jie He & Ming Huang & Wei Zhou, 2023. "Is Regulation Protection? Forest Logging Quota Impact on Forest Carbon Sinks in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-24, September.
    2. Liang, Wenyuan & Arts, Bas & Zinda, John Aloysius & Dong, Jiayun, 2024. "Justice and injustice under authoritarian environmentalism: Investigating tensions between forestland property rights and environmental conservation in China," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    3. Duan, Wei & Shen, Jinyu & Hogarth, Nicholas J. & Chen, Qian, 2021. "Risk preferences significantly affect household investment in timber forestry: Empirical evidence from Fujian, China," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Can & Wang, Sen & Liu, Hao & Zhu, Wenqing, 2017. "Why did the 1980s' reform of collective forestland tenure in southern China fail?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 131-141.
    2. Liu Yang & Yang Ren, 2020. "Has China’s New Round of Collective Forestland Tenure Reform Caused an Increase in Rural Labor Transfer?," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Xu, Chang & Lin, Fanli & Li, Chaozhu & Cheng, Baodong, 2022. "Effects of designating non-public forests for ecological purposes on farmer's forestland investment: A quasi-experiment in southern China," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    4. Liu, Can & Wang, Sen & Liu, Hao & Zhu, Wenqing, 2019. "Reprint of: Why did the 1980s' reform of collective forestland tenure in southern China fail?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 8-18.
    5. Huang, Wei, 2019. "Forest condition change, tenure reform, and government-funded eco-environmental programs in Northeast China," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 67-74.
    6. Caravaggio, Nicola, 2020. "A global empirical re-assessment of the Environmental Kuznets curve for deforestation," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    7. Liu, Ping & Yin, Runsheng & Li, Hua, 2016. "China's forest tenure reform and institutional change at a crossroads," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 92-98.
    8. Xu, Jintao & Tao, Ran & Amacher, Gregory S., 2004. "An empirical analysis of China's state-owned forests," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 6(3-4), pages 379-390, June.
    9. Yang, Xiaojun & Xu, Jintao & Xu, Xiaojie & Yi, Yuanyuan & Hyde, William F., 2020. "Collective forest tenure reform and household energy consumption: A case study in Yunnan Province, China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    10. Huang, Senwei & Zhang, Yaoqi & Zheng, Yifang & Su, Shipeng & Zheng, Jing, 2019. "Inequality and small landholdings: Path dependence, land use and wellbeing," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 62-66.
    11. Xie, Lunyu & Berck, Peter & Xu, Jintao, 2016. "The effect on forestation of the collective forest tenure reform in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 116-129.
    12. Krul, Kees & Ho, Peter & Yang, Xiuyun, 2020. "Incentivizing household forest management in China's forest reform: Limitations to rights-based approaches in Southwest China," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    13. Xu, Chang & Li, Lingchao & Cheng, Baodong, 2021. "The impact of institutions on forestland transfer rents: The case of Zhejiang province in China," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    14. Yin, Runsheng & Xu, Jintao, 2002. "A Welfare Measurement of China's Rural Forestry Reform During the 1980s," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 30(10), pages 1755-1767, October.
    15. Niklas Elert & Magnus Henrekson, 2021. "Entrepreneurship prompts institutional change in developing economies," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 34(1), pages 33-53, March.
    16. Zhang, Yaoqi & Uusivuori, Jussi & Kuuluvainen, Jari, 2000. "Impacts of economic reforms on rural forestry in China," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 27-40, May.
    17. Ke, Shuifa & Qiao, Dan & Zhang, Xiaoxiao & Feng, Qiya, 2021. "Changes of China's forestry and forest products industry over the past 40 years and challenges lying ahead," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    18. Runsheng Yin & Jintao Xu & Zhou Li, 2003. "Building Institutions for Markets: Experiences and Lessons from China's Rural Forest Sector," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 333-351, September.
    19. Zhang, Y., 2001. "Economics of transaction costs saving forestry," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 197-204, February.
    20. Wang, Changbo & Yan, Xilong & Chang, Yuan & Wang, Qunwei & Wang, Yafei & Malik, Arunima, 2023. "Understanding the impact of interprovincial trade on forest resources in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:123:y:2021:i:c:s1389934120306791. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.