IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v121y2020ics1389934120304548.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Productivity and profitability of Larix principis-rupprechtii and Pinus tabuliformis plantation forests in Northeast China

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Zhaochen
  • Xiao, Jun
  • Lu, Gang
  • Sun, Weina
  • Ma, Chenggong
  • Jin, Yudong

Abstract

This study analyzes the productivity and profitability of Larix principis-rupprechtii and Pinus tabuliformis plantation forests in Northeast China. Three management regimes with different thinning intensities (heavy thinning, light thinning, and control) were considered. It is found that high initial planting densities without thinning cause high mortality and slow growth rates, leading to an unprofitable outcome. Thinning operations increase both diameter and height growth of the retained trees, boosting the merchantable volume of large-diameter trees and thus the profitability and productivity. The optimal rotation ages with heavy thinning of Larix principis-rupprechtii and Pinus tabuliformis plantations are 48 and 49 years, 7–8 years longer than what the current management regulation recommends. But the productivity per ha per year of Larix principis-rupprechtii in the heavy thinning regime doubled to 8.21 m3. For Pinus tabuliformis, the thinning treatments cause the productivity gains to increase from 5.1 to 7.9%. The constraints of government regulation without allowance for thinning to the near-mature stands and increasing the intensity could severely reduce the profitability and productivity.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Zhaochen & Xiao, Jun & Lu, Gang & Sun, Weina & Ma, Chenggong & Jin, Yudong, 2020. "Productivity and profitability of Larix principis-rupprechtii and Pinus tabuliformis plantation forests in Northeast China," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:121:y:2020:i:c:s1389934120304548
    DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102314
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934120304548
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102314?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Halbritter, Andreas & Deegen, Peter, 2015. "A combined economic analysis of optimal planting density, thinning and rotation for an even-aged forest stand," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 38-46.
    2. Ke, Shuifa & Qiao, Dan & Yuan, Wantong & He, Youjun, 2020. "Broadening the scope of forest transition inquiry: What does China's experience suggest?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    3. World Bank, 2010. "China Forest Policy : Deepening the Transition, Broadening the Relationship," World Bank Publications - Reports 2993, The World Bank Group.
    4. Hou, Jianyun & Yin, Runsheng & Wu, Weiguang, 2019. "Intensifying Forest Management in China: What does it mean, why, and how?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 82-89.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Su, Haiying & Hou, Fangmiao & Yang, Yixin & Han, Zheng & Liu, Can, 2020. "An assessment of the international competitiveness of China's forest products industry," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    2. Li, Lanying & Lu, Gang & Shen, Yueqin, 2021. "The evolution and impact of timber markets in China's southern collective forest region," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    3. Lo, Kevin, 2021. "Authoritarian environmentalism, just transition, and the tension between environmental protection and social justice in China's forestry reform," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    4. Zhang, Qian & Cheng, Baodong & Diao, Gang & Tao, Chenlu & Wang, Can, 2023. "Does China's natural forest logging ban affect the stability of the timber import trade network?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    5. Caravaggio, Nicola, 2022. "Economic growth and forest transition in Latin America," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    6. Yoon, Tae Kyung & Myeong, Ji Yong & Lee, Yuju & Choi, Yun Eui & Lee, Seonghun & Lee, Sugwang & Byun, Chaeho, 2024. "Are you okay with overtourism in forests? Path between crowding perception, satisfaction, and management action of trail visitors in South Korea," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    7. Moeller, Jonas C. & Susaeta, Andres & Deegen, Peter & Sharma, Ajay, 2024. "Profitability analysis of southern plantations through timber alone or timber and carbon integration in pine-sweetgum mixes," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    8. Khan, M. Ali, 2016. "On a forest as a commodity and on commodification in the discipline of forestry," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 7-17.
    9. Cappelli, Federica & Caravaggio, Nicola & Vaquero-Piñeiro, Cristina, 2022. "Buen Vivir and forest conservation in Bolivia: False promises or effective change?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    10. Liang, Wang & Wang, Guangwei & Xu, Runsheng & Ning, Xiaojun & Zhang, Jianliang & Guo, Xingmin & Ye, Lian & Li, Jinhua & Jiang, Chunhe & Wang, Peng & Wang, Chuan, 2022. "Hydrothermal carbonization of forest waste into solid fuel: Mechanism and combustion behavior," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    11. Chen, Si & Shahi, Chander & Chen, Han Y.H. & McLaren, Brian, 2017. "Economic analysis of forest management alternatives: Compositional objectives, rotation ages, and harvest methods in boreal forests," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(P1), pages 124-134.
    12. Halbritter, Andreas, 2020. "An economic analysis of thinning intensity and thinning type of a two-tiered even-aged Forest stand," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    13. Fengting Wang & Hao Wang & Cong Liu & Lichun Xiong & Zhiquan Qian, 2022. "The Effect of Green Urbanization on Forestry Green Total Factor Productivity in China: Analysis from a Carbon Neutral Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-21, October.
    14. Shuning Zhu & Jinlong Liu & Hao Xu & Lingchao Li & Wentao Yang, 2022. "Has China’s New Round of Collective Forest Reforms Reduced Forest Fragmentation? A Case Study of the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-15, May.
    15. Veli Yilanci & Recep Ulucak & Yaoqi Zhang & Valeria Andreoni, 2023. "The role of affluence, urbanization, and human capital for sustainable forest management in China: Robust findings from a new method of Fourier cointegration," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 812-824, April.
    16. Liu Yang & Yang Ren, 2020. "Has China’s New Round of Collective Forestland Tenure Reform Caused an Increase in Rural Labor Transfer?," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-17, August.
    17. Müller, Fabian & Hanewinkel, Marc, 2018. "Challenging the assumptions of a standard model: How historical triggers in terms of technical innovations, labor costs and timber price change the land expectation value," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 46-56.
    18. Xu, Chang & Lin, Fanli & Li, Chaozhu & Cheng, Baodong, 2022. "Effects of designating non-public forests for ecological purposes on farmer's forestland investment: A quasi-experiment in southern China," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    19. McTaggart, Ewan & Megiddo, Itamar & Kleczkowski, Adam, 2023. "The effect of pests and pathogens on forest harvesting regimes: A bioeconomic model," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    20. Yuge Wang & Apurbo Sarkar & Min Li & Zehui Chen & Ahmed Khairul Hasan & Quanxing Meng & Md. Shakhawat Hossain & Md. Ashfikur Rahman, 2022. "Evaluating the Impact of Forest Tenure Reform on Farmers’ Investment in Public Welfare Forest Areas: A Case Study of Gansu Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:121:y:2020:i:c:s1389934120304548. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.