IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finana/v96y2024ipas1057521924005659.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pay inequality for stability? Investment preference of the national team intervention in Chinese stock market

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Peiran
  • Yuan, Xianghui
  • Jin, Liwei
  • Yuan, Jin

Abstract

We examine the factors that affect the investment decisions of the “national team”, a direct intervention dominated by the central government in the Chinese stock market. By describing the investment preferences of the national team, we discuss the objectives of the intervention policy in implementation. We find that larger firms are more likely to receive investment. The national team prefers undervalued firms and is positively related to future stock returns. We also find that firms under central government control are more likely to receive investment from the national team. This may cause these investments to be relatively inefficient. We provide novel evidence to evaluate the policy and the positioning of the national team in terms of rationality, fairness, and efficiency, and we reveal a potential mechanism by which government intervention in financial markets may cause inequality in the real economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Peiran & Yuan, Xianghui & Jin, Liwei & Yuan, Jin, 2024. "Pay inequality for stability? Investment preference of the national team intervention in Chinese stock market," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:96:y:2024:i:pa:s1057521924005659
    DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103633
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521924005659
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103633?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:96:y:2024:i:pa:s1057521924005659. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620166 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.