IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/gbusec/v9y2007i1p38-61.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Hong Kong government intervention stabilise the stock market? Analysis of the trading volume and volatility

Author

Listed:
  • Yuli Su
  • Yewmun Yip

Abstract

The purchase of Hang Seng Index component stocks by the Hong Kong government has an immediate effect of reducing the daily trading volume for the 33 stocks involved, which, in turn, leads to a reduction in volatility in the stock market. However, once we account for the effect of a decline in trading volume, our results show that government intervention does no have additional effects on the volatility of stock returns for the majority of the Hang Seng Index component stocks. On the other hand, over a longer horizon, an increase in volatility is observed despite a decline in trading volume. Our results suggest that Hong Kong government intervention stabilises the market only in the short run through a reduction in free float in the market. However, in the long run, the effect of government intervention is less clear.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuli Su & Yewmun Yip, 2007. "Does Hong Kong government intervention stabilise the stock market? Analysis of the trading volume and volatility," Global Business and Economics Review, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(1), pages 38-61.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:gbusec:v:9:y:2007:i:1:p:38-61
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=12508
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhu, Minchen & Lv, Dayong & Wu, Wenfeng, 2022. "Market stabilization fund and stock price crash risk: Evidence from the post-crash period," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:gbusec:v:9:y:2007:i:1:p:38-61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=168 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.