IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eurman/v12y1994i4p462-468.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public and private business schools in Russia: Problems and prospects

Author

Listed:
  • Kozlova, Tatiana
  • Puffer, Sheila

Abstract

The recent dramatic changes in Russia have stimulated the growth and number of business schools attempting to meet the new demand for business education. Tatiana Kozlova and Sheila Puffer present the results of a survey of 24 state and private institutions throughout the country. Their current problems are considerable. Financing heads the list, most likely caused by inappropriately reacting to market demand. Lack of qualified faculty is also serious, and there is little exchange of faculty among business schools themselves. But the potential for success is there. Winning schools will be those which find specialized niches in business training, and can generate income from publishing educational materials and research results. Business schools would also be wise to link to the state system of education. The authors' survey finds that some of the business schools are following these strategies, while others appear to be heading in the wrong direction entirely.

Suggested Citation

  • Kozlova, Tatiana & Puffer, Sheila, 1994. "Public and private business schools in Russia: Problems and prospects," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 462-468, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:12:y:1994:i:4:p:462-468
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0263237394900329
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Puffer, Sheila M., 1995. "Shedding the legacy of the red executive: Leadership in Russian enterprises," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 4(2), pages 157-176, June.
    2. Bystrova, Y. & Shirokova, G., 2015. "Organizational changes and firm performance: Evidence from Russian new ventures," Working Papers 6417, Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University.
    3. Sheila Puffer & Daniel McCarthy, 2007. "Does Asian management research need more self-confidence? Reflections from Russia," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 509-517, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:12:y:1994:i:4:p:462-468. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/115/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.