IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v80y2020ics0149718917301349.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Putting evaluation capacity building in context: Reflections on the Ontario Brain Institute’s Evaluation Support Program

Author

Listed:
  • King, Jean A.

Abstract

This article, in three parts, reflects on the content of the six articles included in the forum. It begins with a description of the Evaluation Support Program, emphasizing its key attributes. Next, it raises two points regarding ECB theory: (1) the need to become clearer about the concepts and terms used to describe and study this phenomenon, and (2) the potential value of social science theory to understand ECB and improve its practice. The article concludes with practical ideas for improving ECB: (1) framing it as an educative act, which assigns the evaluator the critical role of evaluation teacher/coach; and (2) the importance of never assuming that an ECB effort begins in unchartered territory, but rather that it builds on people’s knowledge, skills, attitudes, and previous experiences.

Suggested Citation

  • King, Jean A., 2020. "Putting evaluation capacity building in context: Reflections on the Ontario Brain Institute’s Evaluation Support Program," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:80:y:2020:i:c:s0149718917301349
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.05.013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718917301349
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.05.013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bourgeois, Isabelle & Whynot, Jane & Thériault, Étienne, 2015. "Application of an organizational evaluation capacity self-assessment instrument to different organizations: Similarities and lessons learned," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 47-55.
    2. Tseng, Shu-Hui, 2011. "An assessment scale of ECB: Perspectives from the faculty and staff of technical colleges in Taiwan," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 154-159, May.
    3. Naccarella, Lucio & Pirkis, Jane & Kohn, Fay & Morley, Belinda & Burgess, Philip & Blashki, Grant, 2007. "Building evaluation capacity: Definitional and practical implications from an Australian case study," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 231-236, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kumar Chaudhary, Anil & Diaz, John & Jayaratne, K.S.U. & Assan, Elsie, 2020. "Evaluation capacity building in the nonformal education context: Challenges and strategies," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    2. Turner, James A & Guesmi, Bouali & Gil, José M. & Heanue, Kevin & Sierra, Miguel & Percy, Helen & Bortagaray, Isabel & Chams, Nour & Milne, Cath, 2022. "Evaluation capacity building in response to the agricultural research impact agenda: Emerging insights from Ireland, Catalonia (Spain), New Zealand, and Uruguay," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    3. Fleming, M. Lynette & Easton, Janice, 2010. "Building environmental educators' evaluation capacity through distance education," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 172-177, May.
    4. Tseng, Shu-Hui, 2011. "An assessment scale of ECB: Perspectives from the faculty and staff of technical colleges in Taiwan," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 154-159, May.
    5. Rogers, Alison F. & Kelly, Leanne M. & McCoy, Alicia, 2019. "Pathways to becoming an internal evaluator: Perspectives from the Australian non-government sector," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 102-109.
    6. Mayer, Duncan J. & Fischer, Robert L., 2023. "Exploring data use in nonprofit organizations," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    7. Bourgeois, Isabelle & Whynot, Jane & Thériault, Étienne, 2015. "Application of an organizational evaluation capacity self-assessment instrument to different organizations: Similarities and lessons learned," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 47-55.
    8. Maria de Fátima Souza & Ana Carvalho, 2018. "An Organizational Capacity model for wine cooperatives," NIPE Working Papers 10/2018, NIPE - Universidade do Minho.
    9. Rorrer, Audrey S., 2016. "An evaluation capacity building toolkit for principal investigators of undergraduate research experiences: A demonstration of transforming theory into practice," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 103-111.
    10. Norton, Sophie & Milat, Andrew & Edwards, Barry & Giffin, Michael, 2016. "Narrative review of strategies by organizations for building evaluation capacity," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1-19.
    11. Satterlund, Travis D. & Treiber, Jeanette & Kipke, Robin & Kwon, Nicole & Cassady, Diana, 2013. "Accommodating diverse clients’ needs in evaluation capacity building: A case study of the Tobacco Control Evaluation Center," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 49-55.
    12. Wade, Jay & Kallemeyn, Leanne, 2020. "Evaluation capacity building (ECB) interventions and the development of sustainable evaluation practice: An exploratory study," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    13. Chen, Karen Hui-Jung, 2017. "Contextual influence on evaluation capacity building in a rapidly changing environment under new governmental policies," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 1-11.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:80:y:2020:i:c:s0149718917301349. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.