IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v61y2017icp169-177.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Use of concurrent mixed methods combining concept mapping and focus groups to adapt a health equity tool in Canada

Author

Listed:
  • Guichard, Anne
  • Tardieu, Émilie
  • Dagenais, Christian
  • Nour, Kareen
  • Lafontaine, Ginette
  • Ridde, Valéry

Abstract

The aim of this project was to identify and prioritize a set of conditions to be considered for incorporating a health equity tool into public health practice. Concept mapping and focus groups were implemented as complementary methods to investigate the conditions of use of a health equity tool by public health organizations in Quebec. Using a hybrid integrated research design is a richer way to address the complexity of questions emerging from intervention and planning settings. This approach provides a deeper, operational, and contextualized understanding of research results involving different professional and organizational cultures, and thereby supports the decision-making process. Concept mapping served to identify and prioritize in a limited timeframe the conditions to be considered for incorporation into a health equity tool into public health practices. Focus groups then provided a more refined understanding of the barriers, issues, and facilitating factors surrounding the tools adoption, helped distinguish among participants’ perspectives based on functional roles and organizational contexts, and clarified some apparently contradictory results from the concept map. The combined use of these two techniques brought the strengths of each approach to bear, thereby overcoming some of the respective limitations of concept mapping and focus groups. This design is appropriate for investigating targets with multiple levels of complexity.

Suggested Citation

  • Guichard, Anne & Tardieu, Émilie & Dagenais, Christian & Nour, Kareen & Lafontaine, Ginette & Ridde, Valéry, 2017. "Use of concurrent mixed methods combining concept mapping and focus groups to adapt a health equity tool in Canada," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 169-177.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:61:y:2017:i:c:p:169-177
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.01.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718916303354
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.01.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. Masuda & T. Zupancic & E. Crighton & N. Muhajarine & E. Phipps, 2014. "Equity-focused knowledge translation: a framework for “reasonable action” on health inequities," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 59(3), pages 457-464, June.
    2. Linton, Rhoda, 1989. "Conceptualizing feminism : Clarifying social science concepts," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 25-29, January.
    3. Valentine, Kathleen, 1989. "Contributions to the theory of care," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 17-23, January.
    4. Trochim, William M. & McLinden, Daniel, 2017. "Introduction to a special issue on concept mapping," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 166-175.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amal Chakraborty & Natasha J. Howard & Mark Daniel & Alwin Chong & Nicola Slavin & Alex Brown & Margaret Cargo, 2021. "Prioritizing Built Environmental Factors to Tackle Chronic and Infectious Diseases in Remote Northern Territory (NT) Communities of Australia: A Concept Mapping Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Chun, JongSerl & Kim, Jinyung & Lee, Serim, 2023. "Development of a cyberbullying victimization scale for adolescents in South Korea," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    3. Yadira Perez Hazel & Cathy Malla & Anita Afford & Tessa Hillgrove & Reeta Gurung & Anjila Dahal & Sarita Shah & Mohan Krishna Shrestha & Anu Manandhar, 2020. "Continuous Knowledge Translation in Action: Designing a Programmatic Research Trial for Equitable Eye Health for Rural Nepalese Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-12, January.
    4. Matthew D. Wood & Ann Bostrom & Todd Bridges & Igor Linkov, 2012. "Cognitive Mapping Tools: Review and Risk Management Needs," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(8), pages 1333-1348, August.
    5. Southern, Donna M. & Young, Doris & Dunt, David & Appleby, Natalie J. & Batterham, Roy W., 2002. "Integration of primary health care services: perceptions of Australian general practitioners, non-general practitioner health service providers and consumers at the general practice-primary care inter," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 47-59, February.
    6. Marta Roczniewska & Emma Hedberg Rundgren & Henna Hasson & Arnold B. Bakker & Ulrica von Thiele Schwarz, 2022. "How Should Job Crafting Interventions Be Implemented to Make Their Effects Last? Protocol for a Group Concept Mapping Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-10, October.
    7. Erin A. Smyth & Alex Donaldson & Michael K. Drew & Miranda Menaspa & Jennifer Cooke & Sara A. Guevara & Craig Purdam & Craig Appaneal & Rebecca Wiasak & Liam Toohey, 2022. "What Contributes to Athlete Performance Health? A Concept Mapping Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-15, December.
    8. Bar, Haim & Mentch, Lucas, 2017. "R-CMap—An open-source software for concept mapping," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 284-292.
    9. Lee, Serim & Chun, JongSerl, 2020. "Conceptualizing the impacts of cyberbullying victimization among Korean male adolescents," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    10. Askelson, Natoshia & Ryan, Grace & McRee, Annie-Laurie & Farris, Paige E. & Shannon, Jackilen & Hanson, Jessica & Kenyon, DenYelle Baete & Daly, Eliza & Avdic, Lejla, 2021. "Using concept mapping to identify opportunities for HPV vaccination efforts: Perspectives from the Midwest and West Coast," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    11. Onken, Steven J., 2018. "Mental health consumer concept mapping of supportive community," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 36-45.
    12. Ladinig, Thomas B. & Vastag, Gyula, 2021. "Mapping quality linkages based on tacit knowledge," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    13. Mélanie Villeval & Elsa Bidault & Jeannie Shoveller & François Alias & Jean-Charles Basson & Catherine Frasse & Jean-Paul Génolini & Elisabeth Pons & Damien Verbiguié & Pascale Grosclaude & Thierry La, 2016. "Enabling the transferability of complex interventions: exploring the combination of an intervention’s key functions and implementation," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 61(9), pages 1031-1038, December.
    14. Dare, Lynn & Nowicki, Elizabeth, 2019. "Engaging children and youth in research and evaluation using group concept mapping," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1-1.
    15. Menconi, M.E. & Tasso, S. & Santinelli, M. & Grohmann, D., 2020. "A card game to renew urban parks: Face-to-face and online approach for the inclusive involvement of local community," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    16. Alex Donaldson & Kiera Staley & Matthew Cameron & Sarah Dowling & Erica Randle & Paul O’Halloran & Nicola McNeil & Arthur Stukas & Matthew Nicholson, 2021. "The Challenges of Partnering to Promote Health through Sport," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-14, July.
    17. Laura S. Belmon & Fay B. Brasser & Vincent Busch & Maartje M. van Stralen & Irene A. Harmsen & Mai J. M. Chinapaw, 2020. "Perceived Determinants of Children’s Inadequate Sleep Health. A Concept Mapping Study among Professionals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-14, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:61:y:2017:i:c:p:169-177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.