IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v45y2014icp61-70.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Program theory-driven evaluation science in a youth development context

Author

Listed:
  • Deane, Kelsey L.
  • Harré, Niki

Abstract

Program theory-driven evaluation science (PTDES) provides a useful framework for uncovering the mechanisms responsible for positive change resulting from participation in youth development (YD) programs. Yet it is difficult to find examples of PTDES that capture the complexity of such experiences. This article offers a much-needed example of PTDES applied to Project K, a youth development program with adventure, service-learning and mentoring components. Findings from eight program staff focus groups, 351 youth participants’ comments, four key program documents, and results from six previous Project K research projects were integrated to produce a theory of change for the program. A direct logic analysis was then conducted to assess the plausibility of the proposed theory against relevant research literature. This demonstrated that Project K incorporates many of the best practice principles discussed in the literature that covers the three components of the program. The contributions of this theory-building process to organizational learning and development are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Deane, Kelsey L. & Harré, Niki, 2014. "Program theory-driven evaluation science in a youth development context," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 61-70.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:45:y:2014:i:c:p:61-70
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.03.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718914000342
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.03.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brousselle, Astrid & Champagne, François, 2011. "Program theory evaluation: Logic analysis," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 69-78, February.
    2. Gugiu, P. Cristian & Rodriguez-Campos, Liliana, 2007. "Semi-structured interview protocol for constructing logic models," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 339-350, November.
    3. Wilson, Sandra Jo & Lipsey, Mark W., 2000. "Wilderness challenge programs for delinquent youth: a meta-analysis of outcome evaluations," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 1-12, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Harman, Elena & Azzam, Tarek, 2018. "Towards program theory validation: Crowdsourcing the qualitative analysis of participant experiences," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 183-194.
    2. Diana Paricio & Maria F. Rodrigo & Paz Viguer & Marina Herrera, 2020. "Positive Adolescent Development: Effects of a Psychosocial Intervention Program in a Rural Setting," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-17, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Parker D. Houston & Joshua J. Knabb & Robert K. Welsh & Beth M. Houskamp & David Brokaw, 2010. "Wilderness Therapy as a Specialized Competency," International Journal of Psychological Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 2(2), pages 1-52, December.
    2. Tim Benijts, 2014. "A Business Sustainability Model for Government Corporations. A Belgian Case Study," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(3), pages 204-216, March.
    3. Banke-Thomas, Aduragbemi & Nieuwenhuis, Sonja & Ologun, Adesoji & Mortimore, Gordon & Mpakateni, Martin, 2019. "Embedding value-for-money in practice: A case study of a health pooled fund programme implemented in conflict-affected South Sudan," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    4. Harman, Elena & Azzam, Tarek, 2018. "Towards program theory validation: Crowdsourcing the qualitative analysis of participant experiences," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 183-194.
    5. Desjardins, Émilie & Sultan-Taïeb, Hélène & St-Hilaire, France & Vézina, Nicole & Ledoux, Élise & Naji, Rita & Bélanger, Patricia, 2023. "Implementation process evaluation of an ergonomic train the trainer program: How to learn from mechanisms and the temporal structure of processes?," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    6. Adriano Bressane & Rogério Galante Negri & Irineu de Brito Junior & Liliam César de Castro Medeiros & Isabela Lopes Lima Araújo & Mirela Beatriz Silva & Amanda Louisi dos Santos Galvão & Graziele Cora, 2022. "Association between Contact with Nature and Anxiety, Stress and Depression Symptoms: A Primary Survey in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-10, August.
    7. Toby Newstead & Sarah Dawkins & Rob Macklin & Angela Martin, 2020. "The Virtues Project: An Approach to Developing Good Leaders," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(4), pages 605-622, December.
    8. Park, Chul Hyun & Welch, Eric W. & Sriraj, P.S., 2016. "An integrative theory-driven framework for evaluating travel training programs," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 7-20.
    9. Ragnfrid Eline Kogstad & Rita Agdal & Mark Steven Hopfenbeck, 2014. "Narratives of Natural Recovery: Youth Experience of Social Inclusion through Green Care," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-17, June.
    10. Zhao, Guoqing & Xie, Xiaotian & Wang, Yi & Liu, Shaofeng & Jones, Paul & Lopez, Carmen, 2024. "Barrier analysis to improve big data analytics capability of the maritime industry: A mixed-method approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    11. Volden, Gro Holst, 2018. "Public project success as seen in a broad perspective," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 109-117.
    12. Aliza Ramli* & Fadzlina Fahmi & Faizah Darus & Mustaffa Mohamed Zain, 2018. "Corporate Social Responsibility in Malaysian Organisations: Community Environmental Dimensions and Islamic Perspective," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 1051-1057:5.
    13. Nikpay, Fatemeh & Ahmad, Rodina & Yin Kia, Chiam, 2017. "A hybrid method for evaluating enterprise architecture implementation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 1-16.
    14. Dunkley, Ria A. & Franklin, Alex, 2017. "Failing better: The stochastic art of evaluating community-led environmental action programs," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 112-122.
    15. Erika E. Atienzo & Susan K. Baxter & Eva Kaltenthaler, 2017. "Interventions to prevent youth violence in Latin America: a systematic review," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 62(1), pages 15-29, January.
    16. Meehan, Fiona & Tacconi, Luca & Budiningsih, Kushartati, 2019. "Are national commitments to reducing emissions from forests effective? Lessons from Indonesia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 1-1.
    17. Tarik Benmarhnia & Pierre-Alexandre Dionne & Éric Tchouaket & Alvine K. Fansi & Astrid Brousselle, 2017. "Investing in a healthy lifestyle strategy: is it worth it?," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 62(1), pages 3-13, January.
    18. de Vries, Sanne L.A. & Hoeve, Machteld & Wibbelink, Carlijn J.M. & Asscher, Jessica J. & Stams, Geert Jan J.M., 2017. "A randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of the youth crime prevention program ‘New Perspectives’ (NP): Post-treatment changes and moderator effects," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 413-426.
    19. Tremblay, Marie-Claude & Brousselle, Astrid & Richard, Lucie & Beaudet, Nicole, 2013. "Defining, illustrating and reflecting on logic analysis with an example from a professional development program," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 64-73.
    20. Banke-Thomas, Aduragbemi & Nieuwenhuis, Sonja & Ologun, Adesoji & Mortimore, Gordon & Mpakateni, Martin, 2019. "Embedding value-for-money in practice: a case study of a health pooled fund programme implemented in conflict-affected South Sudan," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 101766, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:45:y:2014:i:c:p:61-70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.