IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v33y2010i4p468-476.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A strategy to assist management in workforce engagement and employee retention in the high tech engineering environment

Author

Listed:
  • Kennedy, Elizabeth
  • Daim, Tugrul U.

Abstract

Many companies use survey methods in an attempt to gauge employees' attitudes and opinions toward the company. These attitudes and opinions are directly related to an employee's engagement within the company. In many instances, employees wait in vain for the survey response and the subsequent employer actions, but the truth is sometimes management does not know what to do with the results. For this reason, we theorize that this type of survey, typically utilizing the Likert-scale, is not adequately assisting management in addressing employee engagement and retention issues. For instance, in many occasions, once the survey results are tabulated, companies are doing little or nothing to address the issues. In fact, far too many companies make the mistake of conducting employee engagement surveys, and then ignore the answers. Thus, we propose that a company should take advantage of the survey results, and utilize them to provide data to bridge employees' needs and goals with stakeholders' responsibilities and goals by refining and incorporating them into a hierarchical decision model (HDM). Thus, this would essentially be utilizing the quantitative data to determine what to measure qualitatively. We use a case from the high tech industry, specifically focusing on the engineering environment. Engineering environments are known to be more creative and such approaches would be more beneficial.

Suggested Citation

  • Kennedy, Elizabeth & Daim, Tugrul U., 2010. "A strategy to assist management in workforce engagement and employee retention in the high tech engineering environment," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 468-476, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:33:y:2010:i:4:p:468-476
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149-7189(09)00119-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bhupendra Kumar Verma & Bikrant Kesari, 2020. "Does the Morale Impact on Employee Turnover Intention? An Empirical Investigation in the Indian Steel Industry," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 21(6), pages 1466-1488, December.
    2. Ahmad Ali Almohtaseb & Hisham A Kareem Shaheen & Khalid Mohummed Alomari & Mohmmad Adnan Yousef Almahameed, 2021. "Impact of Talent Management on Organizational Performance: The Moderating Role of an Effective Performance Management System," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(4), pages 1-11, July.
    3. Shalini Srivastava & Poornima Madan, 2016. "Understanding the Roles of Organizational Identification, Trust and Corporate Ethical Values in Employee Engagement–Organizational Citizenship Behaviour Relationship: A Study on Indian Managers," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 41(4), pages 314-330, November.
    4. Adedapo Adewunmi Oluwatayo & Olufunmilayo Adetoro, 2020. "Influence of Employee Attributes, Work Context and Human Resource Management Practices on Employee Job Engagement," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 21(4), pages 295-308, December.
    5. Shumaila Naz & Cai Li & Qasim Ali Nisar & Muhammad Aamir Shafique Khan & Naveed Ahmad & Farooq Anwar, 2020. "A Study in the Relationship Between Supportive Work Environment and Employee Retention: Role of Organizational Commitment and Person–Organization Fit as Mediators," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, May.
    6. Georgiana CRISTEA & Elena-Madalina VATAMANESCU & Andreea MITAN, 2017. "Managing People Dynamics Through The Lens Of Generation Y," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 11(1), pages 738-748, November.
    7. Daim, Tugrul U. & Yoon, Byung-Sung & Lindenberg, John & Grizzi, Robert & Estep, Judith & Oliver, Terry, 2018. "Strategic roadmapping of robotics technologies for the power industry: A multicriteria technology assessment," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 49-66.
    8. Punnee Pimapunsri, 2015. "Relationship between Employee Engagement and Employee Satisfaction on supervision in Manufacturing Industry, Thailand," Proceedings of Business and Management Conferences 2304084, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    9. Pei-Hsuan Tsai & Chih-Jou Chen & Jia-Wei Tang, 2021. "Key Factors Influencing Talent Retention and Turnover in Convenience Stores: A Comparison of Managers’ and Employees’ Perspectives," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, December.
    10. Eric Ng Chee Hong & Lam Zheng Hao & Ramesh Kumar & Charles Ramendran & Vimala Kadiresan, 2012. "The Effectiveness of Human Resource Management Practices," International Journal of Business Research and Management (IJBRM), Computer Science Journals (CSC Journals), vol. 3(2), pages 60-79, April.
    11. Cachón-Rodríguez, Gabriel & Blanco-González, Alicia & Prado-Román, Camilo & Del-Castillo-Feito, Cristina, 2022. "How sustainable human resources management helps in the evaluation and planning of employee loyalty and retention: Can social capital make a difference?," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    12. Daniel Mandel Gandrita & Ana Gandrita & David Pascoal Rosado & Manuel do Carmo, 2023. "Environmental Sustainability for Strategic Planning Effectiveness and Organizational Improvement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-17, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:33:y:2010:i:4:p:468-476. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.