IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v90y2015ip1p1180-1191.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hydromethane generation through SOE (solid oxide electrolyser): Advantages of H2O–CO2 co-electrolysis

Author

Listed:
  • Barelli, L.
  • Bidini, G.
  • Ottaviano, A.

Abstract

This paper aims to investigate a system based on SOE (Solid Oxide Electrolyser) and multistage methanation unit for “hydromethane” production. The presented solution can contribute to mitigate environmental issues related to CO2 reuse and critical issues linked to RES (renewable energy sources) plants interconnection to the grid, beyond that to limit their curtailment. The produced gas mixture, a blend of CH4 and H2, is considered particularly suitable for transportation applications and it can be seen as an interesting energy storage solution. An accurate model of SOE-methanation integrated system was developed in Aspen Plus environment. It allowed to deeply analyse system performance, including the cases of co-electrolysis/steam electrolysis, relative to SOE, and methanation from CO/CO2. A sensitivity analysis, varying the amount of CO2 sent to SOE and methanator, has allowed to determine the most convenient operation mode and the related optimized plant layout, leading to the maximization of advantages. In particular, up to contextual 60.2% and 21.9 MJ/Sm3 of overall efficiency and hydromethane LHV (low heating value) are obtainable by applying SOE technology, in co-electrolysis mode, for hydromethane generation from RES. These impacts are particularly relevant in consideration of the possible hydromethane exploitation in the transport sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Barelli, L. & Bidini, G. & Ottaviano, A., 2015. "Hydromethane generation through SOE (solid oxide electrolyser): Advantages of H2O–CO2 co-electrolysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 1180-1191.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:90:y:2015:i:p1:p:1180-1191
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.06.052
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544215008087
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2015.06.052?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moreno, Blanca & López, Ana J. & García-Álvarez, María Teresa, 2012. "The electricity prices in the European Union. The role of renewable energies and regulatory electric market reforms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 307-313.
    2. Er-rbib, Hanaâ & Bouallou, Chakib, 2014. "Modeling and simulation of CO methanation process for renewable electricity storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 81-88.
    3. Becker, W.L. & Braun, R.J. & Penev, M. & Melaina, M., 2012. "Production of Fischer–Tropsch liquid fuels from high temperature solid oxide co-electrolysis units," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 99-115.
    4. Lise, Wietze & van der Laan, Jeroen & Nieuwenhout, Frans & Rademaekers, Koen, 2013. "Assessment of the required share for a stable EU electricity supply until 2050," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 904-913.
    5. Bass, Robert J. & Malalasekera, Weeratunge & Willmot, Peter & Versteeg, Henk K., 2011. "The impact of variable demand upon the performance of a combined cycle gas turbine (CCGT) power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 1956-1965.
    6. Barelli, Linda & Ottaviano, Andrea, 2015. "Supercharged gas turbine combined cycle: An improvement in plant flexibility and efficiency," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 615-626.
    7. Stempien, Jan Pawel & Ni, Meng & Sun, Qiang & Chan, Siew Hwa, 2015. "Production of sustainable methane from renewable energy and captured carbon dioxide with the use of Solid Oxide Electrolyzer: A thermodynamic assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 714-721.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Samavati, Mahrokh & Santarelli, Massimo & Martin, Andrew & Nemanova, Vera, 2017. "Thermodynamic and economy analysis of solid oxide electrolyser system for syngas production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 37-49.
    2. Giannoulidis, Sotiris & Venkataraman, Vikrant & Woudstra, Theo & Aravind, P.V., 2020. "Methanol based Solid Oxide Reversible energy storage system – Does it make sense thermodynamically?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barelli, Linda & Ottaviano, Andrea, 2015. "Supercharged gas turbine combined cycle: An improvement in plant flexibility and efficiency," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 615-626.
    2. Brynolf, Selma & Taljegard, Maria & Grahn, Maria & Hansson, Julia, 2018. "Electrofuels for the transport sector: A review of production costs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 1887-1905.
    3. Herz, Gregor & Reichelt, Erik & Jahn, Matthias, 2018. "Techno-economic analysis of a co-electrolysis-based synthesis process for the production of hydrocarbons," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 309-320.
    4. Barelli, L. & Desideri, U. & Ottaviano, A., 2015. "Challenges in load balance due to renewable energy sources penetration: The possible role of energy storage technologies relative to the Italian case," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P1), pages 393-405.
    5. Yang, Chao & Jing, Xiuhui & Miao, He & Wu, Yu & Shu, Chen & Wang, Jiatang & Zhang, Houcheng & Yu, Guojun & Yuan, Jinliang, 2020. "Analysis of effects of meso-scale reactions on multiphysics transport processes in rSOFC fueled with syngas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    6. König, Daniel H. & Baucks, Nadine & Dietrich, Ralph-Uwe & Wörner, Antje, 2015. "Simulation and evaluation of a process concept for the generation of synthetic fuel from CO2 and H2," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 833-841.
    7. Luo, Yu & Shi, Yixiang & Li, Wenying & Cai, Ningsheng, 2014. "Comprehensive modeling of tubular solid oxide electrolysis cell for co-electrolysis of steam and carbon dioxide," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 420-434.
    8. Katla, Daria & Bartela, Łukasz & Skorek-Osikowska, Anna, 2020. "Evaluation of electricity generation subsystem of power-to-gas-to-power unit using gas expander and heat recovery steam generator," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    9. Canan Karatekin & Hakan elik, 2020. "The Effects of Renewable Energy Sources on the Structure of the Turkish Electricity Market," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(2), pages 64-70.
    10. Kotowicz, Janusz & Brzęczek, Mateusz, 2019. "Comprehensive multivariable analysis of the possibility of an increase in the electrical efficiency of a modern combined cycle power plant with and without a CO2 capture and compression installations ," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 1100-1120.
    11. Yang, Yongping & Bai, Ziwei & Zhang, Guoqiang & Li, Yongyi & Wang, Ziyu & Yu, Guangying, 2019. "Design/off-design performance simulation and discussion for the gas turbine combined cycle with inlet air heating," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 386-399.
    12. Figueiredo, Nuno Carvalho & Silva, Patrícia Pereira da & Cerqueira, Pedro A., 2016. "It is windy in Denmark: Does market integration suffer?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P2), pages 1385-1399.
    13. Michael Bampaou & Kyriakos Panopoulos & Panos Seferlis & Spyridon Voutetakis & Ismael Matino & Alice Petrucciani & Antonella Zaccara & Valentina Colla & Stefano Dettori & Teresa Annunziata Branca & Vi, 2021. "Integration of Renewable Hydrogen Production in Steelworks Off-Gases for the Synthesis of Methanol and Methane," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-24, May.
    14. Haas, Reinhard & Duic, Neven & Auer, Hans & Ajanovic, Amela & Ramsebner, Jasmine & Knapek, Jaroslav & Zwickl-Bernhard, Sebastian, 2023. "The photovoltaic revolution is on: How it will change the electricity system in a lasting way," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    15. Budny, Christoph & Madlener, Reinhard & Hilgers, Christoph, 2013. "Economic Feasibility of Pipeline and Underground Reservoir Storage Options for Power-to-Gas Load Balancing," FCN Working Papers 18/2013, E.ON Energy Research Center, Future Energy Consumer Needs and Behavior (FCN).
    16. Hasan, Kazi Nazmul & Saha, Tapan Kumar & Eghbal, Mehdi, 2014. "Investigating the priority of market participants for low emission generation entry into the Australian grid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 445-455.
    17. Wu, Wei & Taipabu, Muhammad Ikhsan & Chang, Wei-Chen & Viswanathan, Karthickeyan & Xie, Yi-Lin & Kuo, Po-Chih, 2022. "Economic dispatch of torrefied biomass polygeneration systems considering power/SNG grid demands," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 707-719.
    18. Yi, Qun & Gong, Min-Hui & Huang, Yi & Feng, Jie & Hao, Yan-Hong & Zhang, Ji-Long & Li, Wen-Ying, 2016. "Process development of coke oven gas to methanol integrated with CO2 recycle for satisfactory techno-economic performance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 618-628.
    19. Chattopadhyay, Kabitri & Kies, Alexander & Lorenz, Elke & von Bremen, Lüder & Heinemann, Detlev, 2017. "The impact of different PV module configurations on storage and additional balancing needs for a fully renewable European power system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 176-189.
    20. Qin, Shiyue & Chang, Shiyan & Yao, Qiang, 2018. "Modeling, thermodynamic and techno-economic analysis of coal-to-liquids process with different entrained flow coal gasifiers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 413-432.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:90:y:2015:i:p1:p:1180-1191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.