IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v82y2015icp589-600.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Changes in the relationship between solar radiation and sunshine duration in large cities of China

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Jiandong
  • Linderholm, Hans
  • Chen, Deliang
  • Zhou, Xiuji
  • Flerchinger, Gerald N.
  • Yu, Qiang
  • Du, Jun
  • Wu, Dingrong
  • Shen, Yanbo
  • Yang, Zhenbin

Abstract

Based on the linear relationship between solar radiation and sunshine duration, the Angstrom model is widely used to estimate solar radiation from routinely observed meteorological variables for energy exploitation. However, the relationship may have changed in quickly developing regions in the recent decades under global “dimming” and “brightening” context, with increasing aerosols due to industrial pollutions. Solar radiation stations under different climate conditions in six large cities in China are selected to test this hypothesis. Analysis of the related meteorological items shows that Guiyang has the lowest solar radiation with the average annual value of 10.5 MJm−2d−1, while Lhasa on the Tibetan Plateau has the highest of 20.1 MJm−2d−1. Both radiation and sunshine hours decreased from 1961 to 2010, but at different rates. A moving linear regression method is used to investigate the changes in the relationship between radiation and sunshine duration, the results indicate an abrupt change in the correlation coefficients in 1980–1990s, which can be attributed to the aerosol load resulting from air pollution caused by the industrial development in 1980s under China's Open Door Policy. The sky condition has been changing from clean to dirty, thus the relationship between solar radiation and duration changes in the 1980's and has recovered in the recent decades. This finding implies that it might not necessarily be right to use long data sets for model calibration. Further investigation confirms that the Angstrom model performs the best with higher NSE (nash-sutcliffe efficiency) of 0.914 and lower MAPE (mean absolute percentage error) and RMSE (root mean square error) values of 13.7 w/m2 and 23.9 w/m2 respectively, when calibrated with a 10-year data set. In contrast, the model performs worst when it is calibrated with a 40-year data set, with NSE, MAPE and RMSE values of 0.891, 15.1 w/m2 and 25.3 w/m2, respectively. Based on the findings of this research, a 10-year data set is recommended as the national standard for model calibration in rapidly developing regions of China. Further analogous investigations are needed in other industrial regions to make an international standard for Angstrom model calibration.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Jiandong & Linderholm, Hans & Chen, Deliang & Zhou, Xiuji & Flerchinger, Gerald N. & Yu, Qiang & Du, Jun & Wu, Dingrong & Shen, Yanbo & Yang, Zhenbin, 2015. "Changes in the relationship between solar radiation and sunshine duration in large cities of China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 589-600.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:82:y:2015:i:c:p:589-600
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.01.068
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544215000924
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2015.01.068?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bahel, V. & Bakhsh, H. & Srinivasan, R., 1987. "A correlation for estimation of global solar radiation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 131-135.
    2. Dos Santos, Cícero Manoel & De Souza, José Leonaldo & Ferreira Junior, Ricardo Araujo & Tiba, Chigueru & de Melo, Rinaldo Oliveira & Lyra, Gustavo Bastos & Teodoro, Iêdo & Lyra, Guilherme Bastos & Lem, 2014. "On modeling global solar irradiation using air temperature for Alagoas State, Northeastern Brazil," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 388-398.
    3. Dincer, Ibrahim, 2000. "Renewable energy and sustainable development: a crucial review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 4(2), pages 157-175, June.
    4. Li, Huashan & Ma, Weibin & Lian, Yongwang & Wang, Xianlong & Zhao, Liang, 2011. "Global solar radiation estimation with sunshine duration in Tibet, China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 3141-3145.
    5. Chen, Rensheng & Kang, Ersi & Ji, Xibin & Yang, Jianping & Wang, Junhai, 2007. "An hourly solar radiation model under actual weather and terrain conditions: A case study in Heihe river basin," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1148-1157.
    6. Gueymard, Christian A., 2005. "Importance of atmospheric turbidity and associated uncertainties in solar radiation and luminous efficacy modelling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 30(9), pages 1603-1621.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yıldırım, H. Başak & Teke, Ahmet & Antonanzas-Torres, Fernando, 2018. "Evaluation of classical parametric models for estimating solar radiation in the Eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2053-2065.
    2. Jiandong Liu & Guangsheng Zhou & Hans W. Linderholm & Yanling Song & De-Li Liu & Yanbo Shen & Yanxiang Liu & Jun Du, 2022. "Optimal Strategy on Radiation Estimation for Calculating Universal Thermal Climate Index in Tourism Cities of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-22, July.
    3. Su, Gang & Zhang, Shuangyang & Hu, Mengru & Yao, Wanxiang & Li, Ziwei & Xi, Yue, 2022. "The modified layer-by-layer weakening solar radiation models based on relative humidity and air quality index," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    4. Jiandong Liu & Jun Du & De-Li Liu & Hans W. Linderholm & Guangsheng Zhou & Yanling Song & Yanbo Shen & Qiang Yu, 2022. "Spatial and Temporal Variations in the Potential Yields of Highland Barley in Relation to Climate Change in Three Rivers Region of the Tibetan Plateau from 1961 to 2020," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-15, June.
    5. Jiandong Liu & Yanbo Shen & Guangsheng Zhou & De-Li Liu & Qiang Yu & Jun Du, 2023. "Calibrating the Ångström–Prescott Model with Solar Radiation Data Collected over Long and Short Periods of Time over the Tibetan Plateau," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-16, October.
    6. Zang, Haixiang & Cheng, Lilin & Ding, Tao & Cheung, Kwok W. & Wang, Miaomiao & Wei, Zhinong & Sun, Guoqiang, 2020. "Application of functional deep belief network for estimating daily global solar radiation: A case study in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kambezidis, H.D. & Psiloglou, B.E. & Karagiannis, D. & Dumka, U.C. & Kaskaoutis, D.G., 2017. "Meteorological Radiation Model (MRM v6.1): Improvements in diffuse radiation estimates and a new approach for implementation of cloud products," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 616-637.
    2. Despotovic, Milan & Nedic, Vladimir & Despotovic, Danijela & Cvetanovic, Slobodan, 2015. "Review and statistical analysis of different global solar radiation sunshine models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1869-1880.
    3. Prieto, Jesús-Ignacio & García, David, 2022. "Global solar radiation models: A critical review from the point of view of homogeneity and case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    4. Mecibah, Mohamed Salah & Boukelia, Taqiy Eddine & Tahtah, Reda & Gairaa, Kacem, 2014. "Introducing the best model for estimation the monthly mean daily global solar radiation on a horizontal surface (Case study: Algeria)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 194-202.
    5. Jahani, Babak & Dinpashoh, Y. & Raisi Nafchi, Atefeh, 2017. "Evaluation and development of empirical models for estimating daily solar radiation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 878-891.
    6. Wang, Lunche & Salazar, Germán Ariel & Gong, Wei & Peng, Simao & Zou, Ling & Lin, Aiwen, 2015. "An improved method for estimating the Ångström turbidity coefficient β in Central China during 1961–2010," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 67-73.
    7. Pan, Tao & Wu, Shaohong & Dai, Erfu & Liu, Yujie, 2013. "Estimating the daily global solar radiation spatial distribution from diurnal temperature ranges over the Tibetan Plateau in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 384-393.
    8. Makade, Rahul G. & Jamil, Basharat, 2018. "Statistical analysis of sunshine based global solar radiation (GSR) models for tropical wet and dry climatic Region in Nagpur, India: A case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 22-43.
    9. Bayrakçı, Hilmi Cenk & Demircan, Cihan & Keçebaş, Ali, 2018. "The development of empirical models for estimating global solar radiation on horizontal surface: A case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2771-2782.
    10. Jiandong Liu & Tao Pan & Deliang Chen & Xiuji Zhou & Qiang Yu & Gerald N. Flerchinger & De Li Liu & Xintong Zou & Hans W. Linderholm & Jun Du & Dingrong Wu & Yanbo Shen, 2017. "An Improved Ångström-Type Model for Estimating Solar Radiation over the Tibetan Plateau," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-28, July.
    11. Fan, Junliang & Wu, Lifeng & Zhang, Fucang & Cai, Huanjie & Zeng, Wenzhi & Wang, Xiukang & Zou, Haiyang, 2019. "Empirical and machine learning models for predicting daily global solar radiation from sunshine duration: A review and case study in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 186-212.
    12. Chen, Ji-Long & He, Lei & Yang, Hong & Ma, Maohua & Chen, Qiao & Wu, Sheng-Jun & Xiao, Zuo-lin, 2019. "Empirical models for estimating monthly global solar radiation: A most comprehensive review and comparative case study in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 91-111.
    13. Mercedeh Taheri & Abdolmajid Mohammadian & Fatemeh Ganji & Mostafa Bigdeli & Mohsen Nasseri, 2022. "Energy-Based Approaches in Estimating Actual Evapotranspiration Focusing on Land Surface Temperature: A Review of Methods, Concepts, and Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-57, February.
    14. Besharat, Fariba & Dehghan, Ali A. & Faghih, Ahmad R., 2013. "Empirical models for estimating global solar radiation: A review and case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 798-821.
    15. Karabulut, Halit & Yücesu, Hüseyin Serdar & ÇInar, Can & Aksoy, Fatih, 2009. "An experimental study on the development of a [beta]-type Stirling engine for low and moderate temperature heat sources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 68-73, January.
    16. Xiaohua, Wang & Yunrong, Hu & Xiaqing, Dia & Yuedong, Zhoa, 2006. "Analysis and simulation on rural energy-economy system on Shouyang County in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 139-151, April.
    17. Karatayev, Marat & Clarke, Michèle L., 2016. "A review of current energy systems and green energy potential in Kazakhstan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 491-504.
    18. Aleksandra Matuszewska-Janica & Dorota Żebrowska-Suchodolska & Urszula Ala-Karvia & Marta Hozer-Koćmiel, 2021. "Changes in Electricity Production from Renewable Energy Sources in the European Union Countries in 2005–2019," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-27, October.
    19. Gorkemli Kazar & Arthur Kazar, 2014. "The Renewable Energy Production-Economic Development Nexus," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 4(2), pages 312-319.
    20. Zarzuelo, Carmen & López-Ruiz, Alejandro & Ortega-Sánchez, Miguel, 2018. "Impact of human interventions on tidal stream power: The case of Cádiz Bay," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 88-104.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:82:y:2015:i:c:p:589-600. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.