IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v69y2014icp399-408.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Allothermal air–steam gasification of biomass with CO2 (carbon dioxide) sorption: Performance prediction based on a chemical kinetic model

Author

Listed:
  • Sreejith, C.C.
  • Haridasan, Navaneeth
  • Muraleedharan, C.
  • Arun, P.

Abstract

This paper deals with the technical feasibility of calcium oxide as a sorbent for CO2 (carbon dioxide) in syngas for air–steam gasification of lignocellulosic biomass. The process is simulated through a kinetic approach incorporating rate equations for the component reactions. Using the kinetic simulation data, parametric performance analysis is carried out highlighting the significance of SBR (steam to biomass molar ratio) and SOBR (sorbent to biomass molar ratio) on product gas evolution and heating value. In the range of operating conditions simulated (ER: 0.2–0.5, SBR: 0.25–2.2, SOBR: 0–0.43, T: 873–1273 K), the study reveals that the H2 concentration and heating value LHV (Lower Heating Value) increase respectively, by 13.6–16.5% and 10.2–20.1% for air–steam gasification with the introduction of the sorbent. The optimum values of ER, SBR and SOBR for both H2 concentration and LHV are 0.2, 2.2 and 0.43, respectively. Meanwhile, H2 concentration and LHV are at their optimum values at temperature of 1273 and 1073 K, respectively. At this optimised condition, the producer gas mixture is rich in hydrogen by almost 50%. The predicted results are compared with the reported experimental results on sorbent-enhanced steam gasification. The comparison reveals the good predictive power of the chemical kinetics model which is accurate by 94%.

Suggested Citation

  • Sreejith, C.C. & Haridasan, Navaneeth & Muraleedharan, C. & Arun, P., 2014. "Allothermal air–steam gasification of biomass with CO2 (carbon dioxide) sorption: Performance prediction based on a chemical kinetic model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 399-408.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:69:y:2014:i:c:p:399-408
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.03.031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544214002953
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2014.03.031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mondal, Monoj Kumar & Balsora, Hemant Kumar & Varshney, Prachi, 2012. "Progress and trends in CO2 capture/separation technologies: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 431-441.
    2. Pellegrini, Luiz Felipe & de Oliveira, Silvio, 2007. "Exergy analysis of sugarcane bagasse gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 314-327.
    3. Mendiburu, Andrés Z. & Carvalho, João A. & Coronado, Christian J.R., 2014. "Thermochemical equilibrium modeling of biomass downdraft gasifier: Stoichiometric models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 189-201.
    4. Göransson, Kristina & Söderlind, Ulf & He, Jie & Zhang, Wennan, 2011. "Review of syngas production via biomass DFBGs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 482-492, January.
    5. Chiang, Kung-Yuh & Lu, Cheng-Han & Lin, Ming-Hui & Chien, Kuang-Li, 2013. "Reducing tar yield in gasification of paper-reject sludge by using a hot-gas cleaning system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 47-53.
    6. Guan, Jian & Wang, Qinhui & Li, Xiaomin & Luo, Zhongyang & Cen, Kefa, 2007. "Thermodynamic analysis of a biomass anaerobic gasification process for hydrogen production with sufficient CaO," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(15), pages 2502-2515.
    7. Abrar Inayat & Murni M. Ahmad & Suzana Yusup & Mohamed Ibrahim Abdul Mutalib, 2010. "Biomass Steam Gasification with In-Situ CO2 Capture for Enriched Hydrogen Gas Production: A Reaction Kinetics Modelling Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 3(8), pages 1-13, August.
    8. Piekarczyk, Wodzisław & Czarnowska, Lucyna & Ptasiński, Krzysztof & Stanek, Wojciech, 2013. "Thermodynamic evaluation of biomass-to-biofuels production systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 95-104.
    9. Cho, Min-Hwan & Mun, Tae-Young & Kim, Joo-Sik, 2013. "Production of low-tar producer gas from air gasification of mixed plastic waste in a two-stage gasifier using olivine combined with activated carbon," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 688-694.
    10. Mendiburu, Andrés Z. & Carvalho, João A. & Zanzi, Rolando & Coronado, Christian R. & Silveira, José L., 2014. "Thermochemical equilibrium modeling of a biomass downdraft gasifier: Constrained and unconstrained non-stoichiometric models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 624-637.
    11. N. Florin & A. Harris, 2007. "Hydrogen production from biomass," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 207-215, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zheng, Ji-Lu & Zhu, Ya-Hong & Zhu, Ming-Qiang & Wu, Hai-Tang & Sun, Run-Cang, 2018. "Bio-oil gasification using air - Steam as gasifying agents in an entrained flow gasifier," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 426-435.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahmed, Tigabwa Y. & Ahmad, Murni M. & Yusup, Suzana & Inayat, Abrar & Khan, Zakir, 2012. "Mathematical and computational approaches for design of biomass gasification for hydrogen production: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 2304-2315.
    2. Silva, Isabelly P. & Lima, Rafael M.A. & Silva, Gabriel F. & Ruzene, Denise S. & Silva, Daniel P., 2019. "Thermodynamic equilibrium model based on stoichiometric method for biomass gasification: A review of model modifications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Qitai Eri & Wenzhen Wu & Xinjun Zhao, 2017. "Numerical Investigation of the Air-Steam Biomass Gasification Process Based on Thermodynamic Equilibrium Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Rouboa, Abel, 2019. "Numerical approaches and comprehensive models for gasification process: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 188-206.
    5. Vakalis, Stergios & Moustakas, Konstantinos, 2019. "Modelling of advanced gasification systems (MAGSY): Simulation and validation for the case of the rising co-current reactor," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 526-533.
    6. Csaba Fogarassy & Laszlo Toth & Marton Czikkely & David Christian Finger, 2019. "Improving the Efficiency of Pyrolysis and Increasing the Quality of Gas Production through Optimization of Prototype Systems," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-14, December.
    7. Mendiburu, Andrés Z. & Carvalho, João A. & Coronado, Christian J.R., 2014. "Thermochemical equilibrium modeling of biomass downdraft gasifier: Stoichiometric models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 189-201.
    8. Sérgio Ferreira & Eliseu Monteiro & Paulo Brito & Cândida Vilarinho, 2019. "A Holistic Review on Biomass Gasification Modified Equilibrium Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-31, January.
    9. Udomsirichakorn, Jakkapong & Salam, P. Abdul, 2014. "Review of hydrogen-enriched gas production from steam gasification of biomass: The prospect of CaO-based chemical looping gasification," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 565-579.
    10. Pala, Laxmi Prasad Rao & Wang, Qi & Kolb, Gunther & Hessel, Volker, 2017. "Steam gasification of biomass with subsequent syngas adjustment using shift reaction for syngas production: An Aspen Plus model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 484-492.
    11. Einara Blanco Machin & Daniel Travieso Pedroso & Daviel Gómez Acosta & Maria Isabel Silva dos Santos & Felipe Solferini de Carvalho & Adrian Blanco Machín & Matías Abner Neira Ortíz & Reinaldo Sánchez, 2022. "Techno-Economic and Environmental Assessment of Municipal Solid Waste Energetic Valorization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-17, November.
    12. Freda, Cesare & Tarquini, Pietro & Sharma, Vinod Kumar & Braccio, Giacobbe, 2022. "Thermodynamic improvement of solar driven gasification compared to conventional one," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PA).
    13. Elmaz, Furkan & Yücel, Özgün, 2020. "Data-driven identification and model predictive control of biomass gasification process for maximum energy production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    14. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Al-Ansari, Tareq & Inayat, Muddasser & Sulaiman, Shaharin A. & Parthasarathy, Prakash & McKay, Gordon, 2020. "A critical review on the influence of process parameters in catalytic co-gasification: Current performance and challenges for a future prospectus," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    15. Aydin, Ebubekir Siddik & Yucel, Ozgun & Sadikoglu, Hasan, 2017. "Development of a semi-empirical equilibrium model for downdraft gasification systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 86-98.
    16. Piazzi, Stefano & Patuzzi, Francesco & Baratieri, Marco, 2022. "Energy and exergy analysis of different biomass gasification coupled to Fischer-Tropsch synthesis configurations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    17. Ismail, Tamer M. & Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & El-Salam, M. Abd & Rouboa, Abel, 2020. "Parametric studies in the gasification agent and fluidization velocity during oxygen-enriched gasification of biomass in a pilot-scale fluidized bed: Experimental and numerical assessment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 2429-2439.
    18. Amaro, Jordan & Mendiburu, Andrés Z. & Ávila, Ivonete, 2018. "Modeling of syngas composition obtained from fluidized bed gasifiers using Kuhn–Tucker multipliers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 371-382.
    19. Huang, Y.W. & Chen, M.Q. & Li, Q.H. & Xing, W., 2018. "Hydrogen-rich syngas produced from co-gasification of wet sewage sludge and torrefied biomass in self-generated steam agent," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 202-213.
    20. Bassani, Andrea & Pirola, Carlo & Maggio, Enrico & Pettinau, Alberto & Frau, Caterina & Bozzano, Giulia & Pierucci, Sauro & Ranzi, Eliseo & Manenti, Flavio, 2016. "Acid Gas to Syngas (AG2S™) technology applied to solid fuel gasification: Cutting H2S and CO2 emissions by improving syngas production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1284-1291.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:69:y:2014:i:c:p:399-408. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.