IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v66y2014icp635-642.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

H2 recovery and CO2 capture after water–gas shift reactor using synthesis gas from coal gasification

Author

Listed:
  • Lee, Sung-Wook
  • Park, Jong-Soo
  • Lee, Chun-Boo
  • Lee, Dong-Wook
  • Kim, Hakjoo
  • Ra, Ho Won
  • Kim, Sung-Hyun
  • Ryi, Shin-Kun

Abstract

In this study, a combined test of the WGS (water–gas shift) reactor and a Pd-based composite membrane was carried out for pre-combustion CO2 capture in a coal gasifier. The two series of WGS reactions, i.e., a high-temperature shift and a low-temperature shift, were performed under a gas composition of 60% CO and 40% H2 at 2100 kPa to imitate coal gasification. The CO2 enrichment and H2 recovery tests at 673 K and 2100 kPa with the high-pressure membrane module after the WGS reaction presented the enriched CO2 concentration and H2 recovery ratios of ∼92% and ∼96%, respectively. The long-term stability test showed that the CO2 concentration decreased to 78.2%, and CO was generated and reached to 8.8% in the retentate stream after 47 h because of reverse WGS and CO2 hydrogenation reaction on 316L stainless steel module. The stability test for ∼3137 h showed that these catalytic activities could be successfully prevented using steel with higher Cr and Ni contents, such as 310S. The WGS-membrane combination test using the outlet gas from a real coal gasifier was continued for ∼100 h and showed that the WGS catalysts and membrane module made of 310S would be stable under real conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Lee, Sung-Wook & Park, Jong-Soo & Lee, Chun-Boo & Lee, Dong-Wook & Kim, Hakjoo & Ra, Ho Won & Kim, Sung-Hyun & Ryi, Shin-Kun, 2014. "H2 recovery and CO2 capture after water–gas shift reactor using synthesis gas from coal gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 635-642.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:66:y:2014:i:c:p:635-642
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.01.043
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544214000516
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2014.01.043?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ryi, Shin-Kun & Lee, Chun-Boo & Lee, Sung-Wook & Hwang, Kyung-Ran & Park, Jong-Soo, 2012. "Hydrogen recovery from ethylene mixture with PD-AU composite membrane," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 3-10.
    2. Irfan, Muhammad F. & Usman, Muhammad R. & Kusakabe, K., 2011. "Coal gasification in CO2 atmosphere and its kinetics since 1948: A brief review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 12-40.
    3. Ryi, Shin-Kun & Lee, Chun-Boo & Lee, Sung-Wook & Park, Jong-Soo, 2013. "Pd-based composite membrane and its high-pressure module for pre-combustion CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 237-242.
    4. Kunze, Christian & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2012. "Assessment of oxy-fuel, pre- and post-combustion-based carbon capture for future IGCC plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 109-116.
    5. Li, Bingyun & Duan, Yuhua & Luebke, David & Morreale, Bryan, 2013. "Advances in CO2 capture technology: A patent review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 1439-1447.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gao, Wanlin & Zhou, Tuantuan & Gao, Yanshan & Wang, Qiang, 2019. "Enhanced water gas shift processes for carbon dioxide capture and hydrogen production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    2. Mohammad Fakhrulrezza & Joon Ahn & Hyun-Jin Lee, 2022. "Thermal Design of a Biohydrogen Production System Driven by Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle Waste Heat Using Dynamic Simulation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-25, April.
    3. Hwang, Kyung-Ran & Park, Jin-Woo & Lee, Sung-Wook & Hong, Sungkook & Lee, Chun-Boo & Oh, Duck-Kyu & Jin, Min-Ho & Lee, Dong-Wook & Park, Jong-Soo, 2015. "Catalytic combustion of the retentate gas from a CO2/H2 separation membrane reactor for further CO2 enrichment and energy recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 1192-1198.
    4. Theo, Wai Lip & Lim, Jeng Shiun & Hashim, Haslenda & Mustaffa, Azizul Azri & Ho, Wai Shin, 2016. "Review of pre-combustion capture and ionic liquid in carbon capture and storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1633-1663.
    5. Obara, Shin'ya & Morel, Jorge & Okada, Masaki & Kobayashi, Kazuma, 2016. "Performance evaluation of an independent microgrid comprising an integrated coal gasification fuel cell combined cycle, large-scale photovoltaics, and a pumped-storage power station," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(P1), pages 78-93.
    6. Chen, Wei-Hsin & Kuo, Pei-Chi & Lin, Yu-Li, 2019. "Evolutionary computation for maximizing CO2 and H2 separation in multiple-tube palladium-membrane systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 299-310.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Minkai & Guo, Yincheng, 2013. "Rate based modeling of absorption and regeneration for CO2 capture by aqueous ammonia solution," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 142-152.
    2. Ziębik, Andrzej & Malik, Tomasz & Liszka, Marcin, 2015. "Thermodynamic evaluation of CHP (combined heat and power) plants integrated with installations of coal gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(P2), pages 179-188.
    3. Luis Míguez, José & Porteiro, Jacobo & Pérez-Orozco, Raquel & Patiño, David & Rodríguez, Sandra, 2018. "Evolution of CO2 capture technology between 2007 and 2017 through the study of patent activity," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 1282-1296.
    4. Sreedhar, I. & Vaidhiswaran, R. & Kamani, Bansi. M. & Venugopal, A., 2017. "Process and engineering trends in membrane based carbon capture," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 659-684.
    5. Esmaili, Ehsan & Mostafavi, Ehsan & Mahinpey, Nader, 2016. "Economic assessment of integrated coal gasification combined cycle with sorbent CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 341-352.
    6. Prabu, V. & Geeta, K., 2015. "CO2 enhanced in-situ oxy-coal gasification based carbon-neutral conventional power generating systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 672-683.
    7. Ganapathy, Harish & Steinmayer, Sascha & Shooshtari, Amir & Dessiatoun, Serguei & Ohadi, Michael M. & Alshehhi, Mohamed, 2016. "Process intensification characteristics of a microreactor absorber for enhanced CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 416-427.
    8. Ganapathy, H. & Shooshtari, A. & Dessiatoun, S. & Alshehhi, M. & Ohadi, M., 2014. "Fluid flow and mass transfer characteristics of enhanced CO2 capture in a minichannel reactor," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 43-56.
    9. Giuffrida, A. & Bonalumi, D. & Lozza, G., 2013. "Amine-based post-combustion CO2 capture in air-blown IGCC systems with cold and hot gas clean-up," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 44-54.
    10. Wu, Hai-bo & Xu, Ming-xin & Li, Yan-bing & Wu, Jin-hua & Shen, Jian-chong & Liao, Haiyan, 2020. "Experimental research on the process of compression and purification of CO2 in oxy-fuel combustion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    11. Goto, Kazuya & Yogo, Katsunori & Higashii, Takayuki, 2013. "A review of efficiency penalty in a coal-fired power plant with post-combustion CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 710-720.
    12. Basavaraja, R.J. & Jayanti, S., 2015. "Viability of fuel switching of a gas-fired power plant operating in chemical looping combustion mode," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 213-221.
    13. Ján Kačur & Marek Laciak & Milan Durdán & Patrik Flegner, 2023. "Investigation of Underground Coal Gasification in Laboratory Conditions: A Review of Recent Research," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-55, August.
    14. Xu, Shisen & Ren, Yongqiang & Wang, Baomin & Xu, Yue & Chen, Liang & Wang, Xiaolong & Xiao, Tiancun, 2014. "Development of a novel 2-stage entrained flow coal dry powder gasifier," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 318-323.
    15. Im-orb, Karittha & Simasatitkul, Lida & Arpornwichanop, Amornchai, 2016. "Techno-economic analysis of the biomass gasification and Fischer–Tropsch integrated process with off-gas recirculation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 483-496.
    16. Moioli, Stefania & Giuffrida, Antonio & Romano, Matteo C. & Pellegrini, Laura A. & Lozza, Giovanni, 2016. "Assessment of MDEA absorption process for sequential H2S removal and CO2 capture in air-blown IGCC plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1452-1470.
    17. Vega, F. & Baena-Moreno, F.M. & Gallego Fernández, Luz M. & Portillo, E. & Navarrete, B. & Zhang, Zhien, 2020. "Current status of CO2 chemical absorption research applied to CCS: Towards full deployment at industrial scale," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    18. Prabowo, Bayu & Aziz, Muhammad & Umeki, Kentaro & Susanto, Herri & Yan, Mi & Yoshikawa, Kunio, 2015. "CO2-recycling biomass gasification system for highly efficient and carbon-negative power generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 97-106.
    19. Zhao, Jingyu & Deng, Jun & Wang, Tao & Song, Jiajia & Zhang, Yanni & Shu, Chi-Min & Zeng, Qiang, 2019. "Assessing the effectiveness of a high-temperature-programmed experimental system for simulating the spontaneous combustion properties of bituminous coal through thermokinetic analysis of four oxidatio," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 587-596.
    20. Samuel C. Bayham & Andrew Tong & Mandar Kathe & Liang-Shih Fan, 2016. "Chemical looping technology for energy and chemical production," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(2), pages 216-241, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:66:y:2014:i:c:p:635-642. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.