IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v46y2012i1p259-263.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regional economic output and employment impact of coal-to-liquids (CTL) industry in China: An input–output analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Qi, Tianyu
  • Zhou, Li
  • Zhang, Xiliang
  • Ren, Xiangkun

Abstract

This paper describes the effect of the coal-to-liquids (CTL) industry on economic output and employment in four Chinese regions. The operation of CTL projects require large amount of expense and thus can largely boost regional economy growth by expanding local output demands. However, such economic benefit has never been quantified. In this paper, we evaluate the economic effects of CTL projects in regional China by performing a multiplier analysis with the latest 2007 China regional input–output data. Our analysis shows that CTL projects can greatly boost economic output and employment in regional China. A Direct Coal to Liquid (DCL) project that produces one million tons of fuel every year can increase regional economic output by 0.78%–2.76% and employment by 1.10%–3.15% annually.

Suggested Citation

  • Qi, Tianyu & Zhou, Li & Zhang, Xiliang & Ren, Xiangkun, 2012. "Regional economic output and employment impact of coal-to-liquids (CTL) industry in China: An input–output analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 259-263.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:46:y:2012:i:1:p:259-263
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2012.08.024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036054421200655X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2012.08.024?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ejdemo, Thomas & Söderholm, Patrik, 2011. "Mining investment and regional development: A scenario-based assessment for Northern Sweden," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 14-21, March.
    2. Kerschner, Christian & Hubacek, Klaus, 2009. "Assessing the suitability of input–output analysis for enhancing our understanding of potential economic effects of Peak Oil," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 284-290.
    3. Stilwell, L. C. & Minnitt, R. C. A. & Monson, T. D. & Kuhn, G., 2000. "An input-output analysis of the impact of mining on the South African economy," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 17-30, March.
    4. Xu, Tang & Baosheng, Zhang & Lianyong, Feng & Masri, Marwan & Honarvar, Afshin, 2011. "Economic impacts and challenges of China’s petroleum industry: An input–output analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 2905-2911.
    5. Henry Chen, Y.-H. & Reilly, John M. & Paltsev, Sergey, 2011. "The prospects for coal-to-liquid conversion: A general equilibrium analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(9), pages 4713-4725, September.
    6. Rong, Fang & Victor, David G., 2011. "Coal liquefaction policy in China: Explaining the policy reversal since 2006," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(12), pages 8175-8184.
    7. Aroca, Patricio, 2001. "Impacts and development in local economies based on mining: : the case of the Chilean II region," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 119-134, June.
    8. Erturk, Mehmet, 2011. "Economic analysis of unconventional liquid fuel sources," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(6), pages 2766-2771, August.
    9. Nolan, Peter & Shipman, Alan & Rui, Huaichuan, 2004. "Coal Liquefaction, Shenhua Group, and China's Energy Security," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 150-164, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Markandya, Anil & Arto, Iñaki & González-Eguino, Mikel & Román, Maria V., 2016. "Towards a green energy economy? Tracking the employment effects of low-carbon technologies in the European Union," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1342-1350.
    2. Chunyu Wang & Ling Zhu, 2021. "Life Cycle Assessment of Coal-to-Liquid Process," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(10), pages 14453-14471, October.
    3. Choi, Jun-Ki & Morrison, Drew & Hallinan, Kevin P. & Brecha, Robert J., 2014. "Economic and environmental impacts of community-based residential building energy efficiency investment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 877-886.
    4. He, Gang & Zhang, Hongliang & Xu, Yuan & Lu, Xi, 2017. "China’s clean power transition: Current status and future prospect," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 3-10.
    5. Yi, Hongtao, 2014. "Green businesses in a clean energy economy: Analyzing drivers of green business growth in U.S. states," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 922-929.
    6. Qi, Tianyu & Zhang, Xiliang & Karplus, Valerie J., 2014. "The energy and CO2 emissions impact of renewable energy development in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 60-69.
    7. Tang, Xu & Snowden, Simon & McLellan, Benjamin C. & Höök, Mikael, 2015. "Clean coal use in China: Challenges and policy implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 517-523.
    8. Qi, Tianyu & Winchester, Niven & Karplus, Valerie J. & Zhang, Xiliang, 2013. "Expanding international GHG emissions trading: The role of Chinese and U.S. participation," Conference papers 332348, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    9. Moheddine Younsi & Amine Ben Hadj Hassine & Mustapha Ncir, 2017. "The Economic and Energy Effects of Carbon Dioxide Emissions Trading in the International Market: New Challenge Conventional Measurement," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 8(2), pages 565-584, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Höök, Mikael & Fantazzini, Dean & Angelantoni, André & Snowden, Simon, 2013. "Hydrocarbon liquefaction: viability as a peak oil mitigation strategy," MPRA Paper 46957, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Lopes, Alef & Ruiz, Ricardo & Ribeiro, Rafael & Cantelmo, Weslley, 2023. "Linkages in the metal mining industry: Local job multipliers in Brazil," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    3. Söderholm, Patrik & Svahn, Nanna, 2015. "Mining, regional development and benefit-sharing in developed countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 78-91.
    4. Zhaoyang Kong & Xiucheng Dong & Bo Xu & Rui Li & Qiang Yin & Cuifang Song, 2015. "EROI Analysis for Direct Coal Liquefaction without and with CCS: The Case of the Shenhua DCL Project in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-22, January.
    5. Calzada Olvera, Beatriz, 2024. "Is the Dutch disease well and alive? A cross-country assessment of mining spillovers on employment in the 2002–2014 period," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    6. Dallaire-Fortier, Clara, 2024. "Unemployment ripple: The impact of mine closures in Canada, 1987 to 2020," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    7. Robert J. Brecha, 2013. "Ten Reasons to Take Peak Oil Seriously," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-31, February.
    8. Somaye Narrei & Majid Ataee-pour, 2021. "Assessment of personal preferences concerning the social impacts of mining with choice experiment method," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 34(1), pages 39-49, April.
    9. Cao, Wensheng & Bluth, Christoph, 2013. "Challenges and countermeasures of China’s energy security," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 381-388.
    10. Atienza, Miguel & Lufin, Marcelo & Soto, Juan, 2021. "Mining linkages in the Chilean copper supply network and regional economic development," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    11. Graham A. Davis & John E. Tilton, 2005. "The resource curse," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 29(3), pages 233-242, August.
    12. Minati Sahoo & Dharmabrata Mohapatra & Dukhabandhu Sahoo, 2018. "Livelihood Dynamism in Mining Region of Odisha, India," International Journal of Environmental Sciences & Natural Resources, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 8(1), pages 07-15, January.
    13. Reyno Seymore & Martin Combrinck, 2016. "Alternative Growth Industries In Gabon: An Input-Output Analysis," EcoMod2016 9076, EcoMod.
    14. Fleming, David A. & Measham, Thomas G., 2014. "Local job multipliers of mining," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 9-15.
    15. San Cristobal, J.R. & Biezma, M.V., 2006. "The mining industry in the European Union: Analysis of inter-industry linkages using input-output analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 1-6, March.
    16. Dennis Nchor & Tomáš Konderla, 2016. "Economic Multipliers and Sectoral Linkages: Ghana and the New Oil Sector," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 64(2), pages 635-642.
    17. Sabiroglu, Ilkin M. & Bashirli, Samad, 2012. "Input–output analysis in an oil-rich economy: The case of Azerbaijan," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 73-80.
    18. Katarzyna Pactwa & Justyna Woźniak & Michał Dudek, 2020. "Sustainable Social and Environmental Evaluation of Post-Industrial Facilities in a Closed Loop Perspective in Coal-Mining Areas in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    19. Zian Chen & Sunhee Suk, 2023. "Analysis of Changes in Inter-Industrial Linkages and Economic Effects of Coal Industry in China Using Input–Output Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-19, October.
    20. Valentine, Scott Victor, 2014. "The socio-political economy of electricity generation in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 416-429.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:46:y:2012:i:1:p:259-263. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.