IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v36y2011i1p41-45.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of catalytic hydroliquefaction of Xiaolongtan lignite over FeS, FeS+S and SO42-/ZrO2

Author

Listed:
  • Kang, Shi-Gang
  • Zong, Zhi-Min
  • Shui, Heng-Fu
  • Wang, Zhi-Cai
  • Wei, Xian-Yong

Abstract

The catalytic hydroliquefaction of Xiaolongtan lignite (XL, a Chinese lignite) was investigated in a batch autoclave. The effects of reaction temperature, time and initial H2 pressure on the yields of gaseous and extractable portions (GEPs) were discussed. The catalytic activity of FeS+S was compared with that of FeS and SO42-/ZrO2, respectively. The results show that FeS+S is more active for XL hydroliquefaction than the other two catalysts and affords the highest gas and oil (G & O) yields in the three catalysts. The highest total yield of GEPs from XL hydroliquefaction gets to 90.0%, while total yield of G & O is 61.1% at 420 °C for 30 min over FeS+S. The assistant catalysis of the added sulfur was discussed. The structural features of asphaltenes and preasphaltenes were examined by elemental and FTIR analyses.

Suggested Citation

  • Kang, Shi-Gang & Zong, Zhi-Min & Shui, Heng-Fu & Wang, Zhi-Cai & Wei, Xian-Yong, 2011. "Comparison of catalytic hydroliquefaction of Xiaolongtan lignite over FeS, FeS+S and SO42-/ZrO2," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 41-45.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:36:y:2011:i:1:p:41-45
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.10.025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544210005888
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2010.10.025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xie, Kechang & Li, Wenying & Zhao, Wei, 2010. "Coal chemical industry and its sustainable development in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(11), pages 4349-4355.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Quan, Hongping & Li, Pengfei & Duan, Wenmeng & Chen, Liao & Xing, Langman, 2019. "A series of methods for investigating the effect of a flow improver on the asphaltene and resin of crude oil," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang Guo & Liqun Peng & Jinping Tian & Denise L. Mauzerall, 2023. "Deploying green hydrogen to decarbonize China’s coal chemical sector," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Shao, Tianming & Pan, Xunzhang & Li, Xiang & Zhou, Sheng & Zhang, Shu & Chen, Wenying, 2022. "China's industrial decarbonization in the context of carbon neutrality: A sub-sectoral analysis based on integrated modelling," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    3. Zhao, Jun & Mangi, Hassan Nasir & Zhang, Zhenyue & Chi, Ru'an & Zhang, Haochen & Xian, Mengyu & Liu, Hong & Zuo, Haibin & Wang, Guangwei & Xu, Zhigao & Wu, Ming, 2022. "The structural characteristics and gasification performance of cokes of modified coal extracted from the mixture of low-rank coal and biomass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    4. Yi, Qun & Gong, Min-Hui & Huang, Yi & Feng, Jie & Hao, Yan-Hong & Zhang, Ji-Long & Li, Wen-Ying, 2016. "Process development of coke oven gas to methanol integrated with CO2 recycle for satisfactory techno-economic performance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 618-628.
    5. Bin Xu, 2022. "How to Efficiently Reduce the Carbon Intensity of the Heavy Industry in China? Using Quantile Regression Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-24, October.
    6. Zhou, Wenji & Zhu, Bing & Chen, Dingjiang & Zhao, Fangxian & Fei, Weiyang, 2011. "Technoeconomic assessment of China’s indirect coal liquefaction projects with different CO2 capture alternatives," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 6559-6566.
    7. Yuan, Rong & Behrens, Paul & Rodrigues, João F.D., 2018. "The evolution of inter-sectoral linkages in China's energy-related CO2 emissions from 1997 to 2012," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 404-417.
    8. Mingquan Wang & Lingyun Zhang & Xin Su & Yang Lei & Qun Shen & Wei Wei & Maohua Wang, 2019. "Assessing the technology impact for industry carbon density reduction in China based on C3IAM-Tice," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 99(3), pages 1455-1468, December.
    9. Julien Chevallier, 2013. "At the crossroads: can China grow in a low-carbon way?," Chapters, in: Roger Fouquet (ed.), Handbook on Energy and Climate Change, chapter 31, pages 666-681, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Liu, Yigang & Li, Guoxuan & Chen, Zhengrun & Shen, Yuanyuan & Zhang, Hongru & Wang, Shuai & Qi, Jianguang & Zhu, Zhaoyou & Wang, Yinglong & Gao, Jun, 2020. "Comprehensive analysis of environmental impacts and energy consumption of biomass-to-methanol and coal-to-methanol via life cycle assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    11. Man, Yi & Yang, Siyu & Zhang, Jun & Qian, Yu, 2014. "Conceptual design of coke-oven gas assisted coal to olefins process for high energy efficiency and low CO2 emission," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 197-205.
    12. Zhao, Zhenghui & Wang, Ruikun & Ge, Lichao & Wu, Junhong & Yin, Qianqian & Wang, Chunbo, 2019. "Energy utilization of coal-coking wastes via coal slurry preparation: The characteristics of slurrying, combustion, and pollutant emission," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 609-618.
    13. Li, Hong & Zhou, Hao & Liu, Kailong & Gao, Xin & Li, Xingang, 2021. "Retrofit application of traditional petroleum chemical technologies to coal chemical industry for sustainable energy-efficiency production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    14. Chunyu Wang & Ling Zhu, 2021. "Life Cycle Assessment of Coal-to-Liquid Process," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(10), pages 14453-14471, October.
    15. Chen, Liangzhou & Qi, Xuyao & Zhang, Yabo & Rao, Yuxuan & Wang, Tao, 2022. "Gasification characteristics and thermodynamic analysis of ultra-lean oxygen oxidized lignite residues," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    16. Wei, Zhongbao & Li, Xiaolu & Xu, Lijun & Cheng, Yanting, 2013. "Comparative study of computational intelligence approaches for NOx reduction of coal-fired boiler," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 683-692.
    17. Zhang, You & Yuan, Zengwei & Margni, Manuele & Bulle, Cécile & Hua, Hui & Jiang, Songyan & Liu, Xuewei, 2019. "Intensive carbon dioxide emission of coal chemical industry in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 540-550.
    18. Piotr Gibas & Agnieszka Majorek, 2020. "Analysis of Land-Use Change between 2012–2018 in Europe in Terms of Sustainable Development," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-20, February.
    19. Jie, Dingfei & Xu, Xiangyang & Guo, Fei, 2021. "The future of coal supply in China based on non-fossil energy development and carbon price strategies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    20. Yi, Qun & Feng, Jie & Wu, Yanli & Li, Wenying, 2014. "3E (energy, environmental, and economy) evaluation and assessment to an innovative dual-gas polygeneration system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 285-294.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:36:y:2011:i:1:p:41-45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.