IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v309y2024ics0360544224029293.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Life cycle assessment of typical tower solar thermal power station in China

Author

Listed:
  • Yang, Yuchen
  • Ma, Lin
  • Ma, Wenhui
  • Yu, Zhiqiang
  • Fu, Ling
  • Li, Ming
  • Mao, Dan

Abstract

In light of the growing environmental awareness and the sustainable development consideration in energy policies, the environmental impacts of concentrating solar power (CSP) have attracted significant attention. Considering that the site selection of CSP stations and databases used for evaluation has an important impact on the environment, the objective of this study is to assess the impact of concentrating solar power tower (CSP-T) station with thermal storage devices in the geographical context of China from environmental perspective by the life cycle assessment (LCA) method. To achieve this goal and ensure the reliability of the research results, a 2 × 50 MW capacity, double tank solar nitrate energy storage, and 12-h energy storage time CSP-T station in Dunhuang, Gansu, was selected. In addition, its model was constructed using the eFootprint online platform, assessing the environmental impacts of the CSP-T station according to the cradle-to-grave system boundary. Moreover, the impact assessment was performed in terms of key metrics, such as energy payback time (EPT), carbon cost of electricity (CCOE), carbon flow analysis, and environmental benefits of energy conservation and emission reduction. The results showed that the production stage is the most significant source of environmental impact in the life cycle of the CSP-T station, with the condensing system and heat storage system contributing 50.17 % and 47.64 % respectively. It can be found that the EPT of the CSP-T station is estimated at 4.88 years, accounting for 16.25 % of the operation cycle of the thermal power station, and varies depending on the station's location. It can be reduced to 3.19 years in places such as North Africa with abundant light intensity. Furthermore, the CCOE of the CSP-T station is 0.04 kg CO2/kWh. Overall, CSP-T station has over 95 % environmental benefits for energy conservation and emission reduction for most indices compared to thermal power station. Although the Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) index is slightly lower, it still reaches 82.67 %. To promote the ecological development of the CSP-T station in China, this study usually includes a brief comment or relevant improvement recommendations after each comparative analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang, Yuchen & Ma, Lin & Ma, Wenhui & Yu, Zhiqiang & Fu, Ling & Li, Ming & Mao, Dan, 2024. "Life cycle assessment of typical tower solar thermal power station in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:309:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224029293
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.133154
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544224029293
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2024.133154?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:309:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224029293. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.