IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v306y2024ics0360544224022096.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable hydrogen production from flare gas and produced water: A United States case study

Author

Listed:
  • Moosazadeh, Mohammad
  • Ajori, Shahram
  • Taghikhani, Vahid
  • Moghanloo, Rouzbeh G.
  • Yoo, ChangKyoo

Abstract

Gas flaring and produced water (PW) emissions are common environmental challenges with significant impacts on the oil production industry. This study proposes a novel approach to address these concerns by developing energy self-sufficient networks for simultaneous utilization of flare gas (FG) and PW for sustainable hydrogen production. Three distinct scenarios are analyzed: hydrogen production without CO2 capture (Hydra), fossil fuel-based (FF) hydrogen production with CO2 capture and utilization in enhanced oil recovery (HydraCap-FF), and a solar-thermal-assisted HydraCap-FF system (HydraCap-RE). Techno-economic and environmental models are constructed for each scenario's optimal configuration, enabling a comparative analysis of their economic viability and environmental impact. Additionally, the designed systems are examined through a flexibility analysis to evaluate input materials and their influence on the system's viability. Results highlight the promising potential of HydraCap-RE, achieving significant reductions in CO2 emissions and water footprint compared to traditional methods. The HydraCap-RE generates hydrogen with the cost of 2.86 $/kg H2, hydrogen yield of 31.25 kg H2/100 kg FG, specific emission of 0.86 kg CO2/kg H2 and water footprint of 0.185 kg H2O/kg H2. Moreover, the flexibility analysis indicates that an optimal FG/PW ratio of 0.53 yields the highest economic value. The results demonstrate that deploying HydraCap-FF in the Permian, Bakken, and Eagle Ford shale regions can produce 0.807, 0.454, and 0.121 million tons of hydrogen annually, respectively, and reduce CO2 emissions by 6.37, 3.58, and 0.956 million tons, respectively. Furthermore, the HydraCap-RE deployment in these shale fields outperformed, with 17 % higher hydrogen production and 28.42 % lower CO2 emissions. These findings provide valuable insights for decision-makers seeking to reduce CO2 emissions the oil and gas industries and providing clean and sustainable products for these areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Moosazadeh, Mohammad & Ajori, Shahram & Taghikhani, Vahid & Moghanloo, Rouzbeh G. & Yoo, ChangKyoo, 2024. "Sustainable hydrogen production from flare gas and produced water: A United States case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:306:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224022096
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.132435
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544224022096
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2024.132435?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mehrshad Kolahchian Tabrizi & Jacopo Famiglietti & Davide Bonalumi & Stefano Campanari, 2023. "The Carbon Footprint of Hydrogen Produced with State-of-the-Art Photovoltaic Electricity Using Life-Cycle Assessment Methodology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-25, July.
    2. Dong, Xiao & Trembly, Jason & Bayless, David, 2017. "Techno-economic analysis of hydraulic fracking flowback and produced water treatment in supercritical water reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 777-783.
    3. Jordán, Pérez Sánchez & Javier Eduardo, Aguillón Martínez & Zdzislaw, Mazur Czerwiec & Alan Martín, Zavala Guzmán & Liborio, Huante Pérez & Jesús Antonio, Flores Zamudio & Mario Román, Díaz Guillén, 2019. "Techno-economic analysis of solar-assisted post-combustion carbon capture to a pilot cogeneration system in Mexico," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 1107-1119.
    4. Tariq, Shahzeb & Safder, Usman & Yoo, ChangKyoo, 2022. "Exergy-based weighted optimization and smart decision-making for renewable energy systems considering economics, reliability, risk, and environmental assessments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    5. Lambert, Tristan & Hoadley, Andrew & Hooper, Barry, 2014. "Process integration of solar thermal energy with natural gas combined cycle carbon capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 248-253.
    6. Moosazadeh, Mohammad & Tariq, Shahzeb & Safder, Usman & Yoo, ChangKyoo, 2023. "Techno-economic feasibility and environmental impact evaluation of a hybrid solar thermal membrane-based power desalination system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    7. Ji-chao, Yang & Sobhani, Behrooz, 2021. "Integration of biomass gasification with a supercritical CO2 and Kalina cycles in a combined heating and power system: A thermodynamic and exergoeconomic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Moosazadeh, Mohammad & Tariq, Shahzeb & Safder, Usman & Yoo, ChangKyoo, 2023. "Techno-economic feasibility and environmental impact evaluation of a hybrid solar thermal membrane-based power desalination system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    2. Safder, Usman & Loy-Benitez, Jorge & Yoo, ChangKyoo, 2024. "Techno-economic assessment of a novel integrated multigeneration system to synthesize e-methanol and green hydrogen in a carbon-neutral context," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    3. Okoroigwe, Edmund & Madhlopa, Amos, 2016. "An integrated combined cycle system driven by a solar tower: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 337-350.
    4. Qian, Xiaoyan & Dai, Jie & Jiang, Weimin & Cai, Helen & Ye, Xixi & Shahab Vafadaran, Mohammad, 2024. "Economic viability and investment returns of innovative geothermal tri-generation systems: A comparative study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    5. Cai, Jianhui & Fei, Jiaming & Li, Liguang & Fei, Cheng & Maghsoudniazi, Mohammadhadi & Su, Zhanguo, 2023. "Multicriteria study of geothermal trigeneration systems with configurations of hybrid vapor compression refrigeration and Kalina cycles for sport arena application," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(P1).
    6. Jiang, Xingwen & Chen, Mian & Li, Qinghui & Liang, Lihao & Zhong, Zhen & Yu, Bo & Wen, Hang, 2022. "Study on the feasibility of the heat treatment after shale gas reservoir hydration fracturing," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PB).
    7. Fu, Yidan & Cai, Lei & Qi, Chenyu & Zhai, Jiangfeng, 2024. "Thermodynamic and economic analyses of the biomass gasification Allam cycle integrated with compressed carbon energy storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    8. Guo, Shenghui & Meng, Fanrui & Peng, Pai & Xu, Jialing & Jin, Hui & Chen, Yunan & Guo, Liejin, 2022. "Thermodynamic analysis of the superiority of the direct mass transfer design in the supercritical water gasification system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PA).
    9. Arkadiusz Małek & Agnieszka Dudziak & Jacek Caban & Monika Stoma, 2024. "Strategic Model for Yellow Hydrogen Production Using the Metalog Family of Probability Distributions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-24, May.
    10. Ponce, Carolina V. & Sáez, Doris & Bordons, Carlos & Núñez, Alfredo, 2016. "Dynamic simulator and model predictive control of an integrated solar combined cycle plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 974-986.
    11. Han, Zepeng & Han, Wei & Sui, Jun, 2024. "Exergo-environmental cost optimization and thermodynamic analysis for a solar-driven combined heating and power system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    12. Asadi, Javad & Kazempoor, Pejman, 2024. "Economic and operational assessment of solar-assisted hybrid carbon capture system for combined cycle power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    13. Nemati Mofarrah, Ali & Jalalvand, Meysam & Abdolmaleki, Abbas, 2023. "Design, multi-aspect analyses, and multi-objective optimization of a biomass/geothermal-based cogeneration of power and freshwater," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    14. Zhu, Chaoyang & Wang, Mengxia & Guo, Mengxing & Deng, Jinxin & Du, Qipei & Wei, Wei & Zhang, Yunxiang & Mohebbi, Amir, 2024. "An innovative process design and multi-criteria study/optimization of a biomass digestion-supercritical carbon dioxide scenario toward boosting a geothermal-driven cogeneration system for power and he," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    15. Ramin Ghiami Sardroud & Amirreza Javaherian & Seyed Mohammad Seyed Mahmoudi & Mehri Akbari Kordlar & Marc A. Rosen, 2023. "Proposal and Comprehensive Analysis of a Novel Combined Plant with Gas Turbine and Organic Flash Cycles: An Application of Multi-Objective Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-40, September.
    16. Li, Bo & Wang, Shun-sen, 2022. "Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of a hybrid cascade supercritical carbon dioxide cycle for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    17. Carapellucci, Roberto & Giordano, Lorena & Vaccarelli, Maura, 2015. "Studying heat integration options for steam-gas power plants retrofitted with CO2 post-combustion capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 594-608.
    18. Shokri Kalan, Ali & Heidarabadi, Shadab & Khaleghi, Mohammad & Ghiasirad, Hamed & Skorek-Osikowska, Anna, 2023. "Biomass-to-energy integrated trigeneration system using supercritical CO2 and modified Kalina cycles: Energy and exergy analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    19. Chen, X. & Sun, L.N. & Du, S., 2022. "Analysis and optimization on a modified ammonia-water power cycle for more efficient power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    20. Zheng, Cunchuan & Liu, Fuchuan & Zhang, Tailiang & Huang, Zhiyu, 2021. "Preparation of fluoropolymer nanoparticles(FPNPs) dispersion and its application as a wetting adjustment agent for sandstone rocks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:306:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224022096. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.