IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v278y2023ipas0360544223011726.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Information gap decision theory with risk aversion strategy for robust planning of hybrid photovoltaic/wind/battery storage system in distribution networks considering uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Boroumandfar, Gholamreza
  • Khajehzadeh, Alimorad
  • Eslami, Mahdiyeh
  • Syah, Rahmad B.Y.

Abstract

In this paper, robust planning of hybrid photovoltaic/wind/battery storage (PV/WT/Battery) system is performed in the distribution network to minimize power losses cost, purchasing power cost from the hybrid system as well as purchasing power cost from the upstream network considering uncertainties of network demand and renewable generation using information gap decision theory (IGDT) based on risk aversion strategy (RAS). The decision variables are considered as the optimal installation location and capacity of the hybrid system components in the network as well as the uncertainty radius of the uncertain parameters, which is determined using the flow direction algorithm (FDA), which is inspired by the movement of surface water flow to the pond outlet. The planning problem is implemented with deterministic and robust-based IGDT approaches. The proposed methodology is performed on the IEEE 33- and 69-bus distribution networks. The deterministic results indicate that the optimal hybrid PV/WT/Battery system planning in the networks significantly reduces system costs by injecting the optimal renewable power into the network and the battery power reserve management. The better capability of the FDA in deterministic planning is confirmed compared to the particle swarm optimization (PSO), crow search algorithm (CSA), and moth-flame optimizer (MFO) in achieving lower system cost. Moreover, in the IGDT robust approach, the maximum uncertainty radius of the renewable generation and network load is determined for the different uncertainties budget. The IGDT effectiveness is proved compared with deterministic and Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) methods. The total cost of the 33-bus network in deterministic, IGDT, and MCS is obtained at $ 17978.18, $ 20996.19, and $ 26178.02, respectively, and for the 69-bus network are achieved at $ 16846.26, $ 20215.39, and $ 20597.84, respectively. A comparison of the results showed that the MCS strongly depends on the defined scenarios, is very time-consuming, and is also not able to provide a level of cost assurance, the deterministic method is not able to determine the effect of uncertainties on system planning, but the IGDT can easily determine the cost of the system based on changes in uncertainty parameters. Also, planning based on the IGDT has resulted in the achievement of a robust hybrid system against forecasting errors caused by uncertainties.

Suggested Citation

  • Boroumandfar, Gholamreza & Khajehzadeh, Alimorad & Eslami, Mahdiyeh & Syah, Rahmad B.Y., 2023. "Information gap decision theory with risk aversion strategy for robust planning of hybrid photovoltaic/wind/battery storage system in distribution networks considering uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:278:y:2023:i:pa:s0360544223011726
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.127778
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544223011726
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2023.127778?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Yang & Feng, Bo & Li, Guoqing & Qi, Junjian & Zhao, Dongbo & Mu, Yunfei, 2018. "Optimal distributed generation planning in active distribution networks considering integration of energy storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 1073-1081.
    2. Zhang, Shenxi & Cheng, Haozhong & Li, Ke & Tai, Nengling & Wang, Dan & Li, Furong, 2018. "Multi-objective distributed generation planning in distribution network considering correlations among uncertainties," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 743-755.
    3. Jam, Alireza & Ardehali, Morteza Mohammadi & Hosseinian, Seyed Hossein, 2017. "A comprehensive approach for wind turbine generation allocation with accurate analysis of load curtailment using nested programming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 1063-1078.
    4. Sun, Qie & Fu, Yu & Lin, Haiyang & Wennersten, Ronald, 2022. "A novel integrated stochastic programming-information gap decision theory (IGDT) approach for optimization of integrated energy systems (IESs) with multiple uncertainties," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    5. Mohamad, Farihan & Teh, Jiashen & Lai, Ching-Ming, 2021. "Optimum allocation of battery energy storage systems for power grid enhanced with solar energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    6. Younesi, Abdollah & Shayeghi, Hossein & Safari, Amin & Siano, Pierluigi, 2020. "Assessing the resilience of multi microgrid based widespread power systems against natural disasters using Monte Carlo Simulation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    7. Majidi, M. & Mohammadi-Ivatloo, B. & Soroudi, A., 2019. "Application of information gap decision theory in practical energy problems: A comprehensive review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C), pages 157-165.
    8. Ali, E.S. & Abd Elazim, S.M. & Abdelaziz, A.Y., 2017. "Ant Lion Optimization Algorithm for optimal location and sizing of renewable distributed generations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 1311-1324.
    9. Esmaeili, Mobin & Sedighizadeh, Mostafa & Esmaili, Masoud, 2016. "Multi-objective optimal reconfiguration and DG (Distributed Generation) power allocation in distribution networks using Big Bang-Big Crunch algorithm considering load uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 86-99.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tan, Hong & Wang, Yuwei & Wang, Qiujie & Lin, Zhenjia & Mohamed, Mohamed A., 2024. "Day-ahead dispatch of electricity-hydrogen systems under solid-state transportation mode of hydrogen energy via FV-IGDT approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 300(C).
    2. Tostado-Véliz, Marcos & Liang, Yingqi & Hasanien, Hany M. & Turky, Rania A. & Martínez-Moreno, Juan & Jurado, Francisco, 2023. "Robust optimal coordination of active distribution networks and energy communities with high penetration of renewables," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    3. Li, Hongze & Li, Xumeng & Zhang, Yuanyuan & Zhao, Yihang & Pan, Jiaqi & Zhao, Huiru, 2024. "Declaration strategy of wind power and pumped storage participating in the power market considering multiple uncertainties," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    4. Ahmed A. Alguhi & Majed A. Alotaibi & Essam A. Al-Ammar, 2023. "Probabilistic Planning for an Energy Storage System Considering the Uncertainties in Smart Distribution Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-23, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Singh, Pushpendra & Meena, Nand K. & Yang, Jin & Vega-Fuentes, Eduardo & Bishnoi, Shree Krishna, 2020. "Multi-criteria decision making monarch butterfly optimization for optimal distributed energy resources mix in distribution networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    2. Ehsan, Ali & Yang, Qiang, 2019. "State-of-the-art techniques for modelling of uncertainties in active distribution network planning: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 1509-1523.
    3. Ehsan, Ali & Yang, Qiang, 2018. "Optimal integration and planning of renewable distributed generation in the power distribution networks: A review of analytical techniques," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 44-59.
    4. Ben Hamida, Imen & Salah, Saoussen Brini & Msahli, Faouzi & Mimouni, Mohamed Faouzi, 2018. "Optimal network reconfiguration and renewable DG integration considering time sequence variation in load and DGs," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 66-80.
    5. Al-Attar Ali Mohamed & Shimaa Ali & Salem Alkhalaf & Tomonobu Senjyu & Ashraf M. Hemeida, 2019. "Optimal Allocation of Hybrid Renewable Energy System by Multi-Objective Water Cycle Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-20, November.
    6. Sepideh Rezaeeian & Narges Bayat & Abbas Rabiee & Saman Nikkhah & Alireza Soroudi, 2022. "Optimal Scheduling of Reconfigurable Microgrids in Both Grid-Connected and Isolated Modes Considering the Uncertainty of DERs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-18, July.
    7. Li, Yang & Feng, Bo & Wang, Bin & Sun, Shuchao, 2022. "Joint planning of distributed generations and energy storage in active distribution networks: A Bi-Level programming approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    8. Mohammadhafez Bazrafshan & Likhitha Yalamanchili & Nikolaos Gatsis & Juan Gomez, 2019. "Stochastic Planning of Distributed PV Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, January.
    9. Yang, Tongxu & Zhang, Limei & Zhen, Linteng & Liu, Yongfu & Song, Qianqian & Tang, Wei, 2021. "Fast microgrids formation of distribution network with high penetration of DERs considering reliability," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    10. Li, Yinxiao & Wang, Yi & Chen, Qixin, 2020. "Study on the impacts of meteorological factors on distributed photovoltaic accommodation considering dynamic line parameters," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    11. Ying-Yi Hong & Gerard Francesco DG. Apolinario, 2021. "Uncertainty in Unit Commitment in Power Systems: A Review of Models, Methods, and Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-47, October.
    12. Mohamed A. Elseify & Salah Kamel & Hussein Abdel-Mawgoud & Ehab E. Elattar, 2022. "A Novel Approach Based on Honey Badger Algorithm for Optimal Allocation of Multiple DG and Capacitor in Radial Distribution Networks Considering Power Loss Sensitivity," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-26, June.
    13. Zhang, Shenxi & Cheng, Haozhong & Wang, Dan & Zhang, Libo & Li, Furong & Yao, Liangzhong, 2018. "Distributed generation planning in active distribution network considering demand side management and network reconfiguration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1921-1936.
    14. Guido C. Guerrero-Liquet & Santiago Oviedo-Casado & J. M. Sánchez-Lozano & M. Socorro García-Cascales & Javier Prior & Antonio Urbina, 2018. "Determination of the Optimal Size of Photovoltaic Systems by Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-18, December.
    15. Moradi-Sepahvand, Mojtaba & Amraee, Turaj, 2021. "Integrated expansion planning of electric energy generation, transmission, and storage for handling high shares of wind and solar power generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    16. Feras Alasali & Mohammad Salameh & Ali Semrin & Khaled Nusair & Naser El-Naily & William Holderbaum, 2022. "Optimal Controllers and Configurations of 100% PV and Energy Storage Systems for a Microgrid: The Case Study of a Small Town in Jordan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, July.
    17. Lu, Yu & Xiang, Yue & Huang, Yuan & Yu, Bin & Weng, Liguo & Liu, Junyong, 2023. "Deep reinforcement learning based optimal scheduling of active distribution system considering distributed generation, energy storage and flexible load," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    18. Sun, Wei & Harrison, Gareth P., 2019. "Wind-solar complementarity and effective use of distribution network capacity," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 89-101.
    19. Chandrasekaran Venkatesan & Raju Kannadasan & Mohammed H. Alsharif & Mun-Kyeom Kim & Jamel Nebhen, 2021. "A Novel Multiobjective Hybrid Technique for Siting and Sizing of Distributed Generation and Capacitor Banks in Radial Distribution Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-34, March.
    20. Li, Yang & Wang, Jinlong & Zhao, Dongbo & Li, Guoqing & Chen, Chen, 2018. "A two-stage approach for combined heat and power economic emission dispatch: Combining multi-objective optimization with integrated decision making," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 237-254.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:278:y:2023:i:pa:s0360544223011726. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.